July 9, 2020

20° C, Partly cloudy

Full Forecast

Close this


Advertise With Us


Ripped from the headlines

Dutch photographer's politically charged images take uncomfortable position between art, journalism

SUPPLIED PHOTO</p><p>Dutch artist Lidwien van de Ven documented scenes in Europe and the Middle East, including this Palestinin boy in Ramallah.</p>


Dutch artist Lidwien van de Ven documented scenes in Europe and the Middle East, including this Palestinin boy in Ramallah.

Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 30/3/2017 (1197 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.

When art makes the headlines, it’s often bad news. Antiquities looted and destroyed in distant war zones; closer to home, vulnerable, personal works vandalized and stolen from a recent Craft Council show at HSC.

In the United States right now, in 2017, the art world is tearing itself apart over a painting. I’d take it as a sign of art’s enduring relevance if the particulars weren’t so fraught.

Included in this year’s Whitney Biennial, Open Casket by painter Dana Schutz, who is white, reinterprets horrific and widely circulated photographs of Emmett Till at his funeral. The fourteen-year-old black boy lynched by grown white men in 1955. Emmett’s mother, Mamie Till, insisted on a public viewing: the world would see her son’s face, or what was left where his face had been.

Moved by the image, Schutz painted it in her muscular, semi-abstract style, transmuting mangled flesh into violent smears. Since its debut, black artists, critics and their allies have lined up to thoughtfully, forcefully and persuasively explain why she really shouldn’t have.

The question is less about Schutz’s "right" to use the image than her responsibility to use it conscientiously, not beautify or "estheticize" it and, most importantly, not profit from an image of pain that critics argue she can never understand. Schutz’s paintings routinely achieve six figures at auction: she’s promised not to sell Open Casket, but the attention will bolster her brand, regardless. Calls for the work to be withdrawn and destroyed have inspired predictable waves of counter-protest.

Schutz and Till — faceless images, rights and responsibilities — are on my mind at Living On, the exhibition of large-scale documentary photographs by Dutch artist Lidwien van de Ven at the University of Manitoba’s School of Art Gallery, though on the surface its particulars are different.

Van de Ven is an artist, but she’s adopted the esthetics and working habits of a photojournalist. She travels Europe and the Middle East documenting scenes of street-level protest that capture shifting power dynamics and clashing waves of uprising, repression, migration and reactionary nativism.

In Living On, we get an uncomfortably close bird’s-eye view of protesters in Cairo’s Tahrir Square. In Beirut, a woman who reads as a South Asian domestic worker walks someone’s dog in front of a bombed-out car. A Palestinian boy hides his face behind a doorway in Ramallah — playfully or in fear, we can’t know.

Layered graffiti, protest signs and rotting posters are recurring motifs, the last of which finding echoes in the installation itself. Van de Ven’s prints are monumental, pasted directly to grey-toned gallery walls. They appear almost as projections, apparitions or JPEGs on a screen, even as they’re emphatically, physically fixed in place. They’ll have to be scraped off when the show comes down.

A straight-ahead shot of a faded, water-damaged flyer memorializing a now-faceless suicide bomber exemplifies the subtlety of van de Ven’s treatment of image and text — and the profound ambivalence of her approach.

Photojournalists are held to exacting ethical standards, artists less so. For better or worse, that tension is central to what van de Ven is doing here. She’s cannier than Schutz (the ephemeral prints at least sidestep the secondary market), but similar questions persist. Her photo of survivors huddled in the shelter of a blasted apartment tower has the grace and presence of a Baroque history painting or Romantic landscape, but to see it this way seems monstrous.

As an insulated North American, I can find value in my discomfort, but I worry that’s not important. Better to ask the boy in the doorway or the woman with the dog, the families left behind by the suicide bombing, whoever they are.

One image tears loose from the hushed gallery, migrating out to the lobby. Shot in Berlin, a row of German police stand between van de Ven with her camera and activists protesting PEGIDA, an anti-immigrant, anti-Muslim hate group. We don’t see anyone’s face. "Which side are you on?" it seems to demand, and from van de Ven’s perspective (and ours) it’s hard to tell. That ambiguity, for me at least, strikes much closer to home.

Steven Leyden Cochrane is a Winnipeg-based artist, writer and educator.


Advertise With Us

Your support has enabled us to provide free access to stories about COVID-19 because we believe everyone deserves trusted and critical information during the pandemic.

Our readership has contributed additional funding to give Free Press online subscriptions to those that can’t afford one in these extraordinary times — giving new readers the opportunity to see beyond the headlines and connect with other stories about their community.

To those who have made donations, thank you.

To those able to give and share our journalism with others, please Pay it Forward.

The Free Press has shared COVID-19 stories free of charge because we believe everyone deserves access to trusted and critical information during the pandemic.

While we stand by this decision, it has undoubtedly affected our bottom line.

After nearly 150 years of reporting on our city, we don’t want to stop any time soon. With your support, we’ll be able to forge ahead with our journalistic mission.

If you believe in an independent, transparent, and democratic press, please consider subscribing today.

We understand that some readers cannot afford a subscription during these difficult times and invite them to apply for a free digital subscription through our Pay it Forward program.

The Free Press will close this commenting platform at noon on July 14.

We want to thank those who have shared their views over the years as part of this reader engagement initiative.

In the coming weeks, the Free Press will announce new opportunities for readers to share their thoughts and to engage with our staff and each other.

You can comment on most stories on The Winnipeg Free Press website. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or digital subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

Have Your Say

Have Your Say

Comments are open to The Winnipeg Free Press print or digital subscribers only. why?

Have Your Say

Comments are open to The Winnipeg Free Press Subscribers only. why?

By submitting your comment, you agree to abide by our Community Standards and Moderation Policy. These guidelines were revised effective February 27, 2019. Have a question about our comment forum? Check our frequently asked questions.


Advertise With Us