August 23, 2017


14° C, Sunny

Full Forecast


Advertise With Us

Full-court press

Michael Jordan may not be likable, but he's still the greatest to have played the game

Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 9/5/2014 (1201 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.

Eleven years after Michael Jordan played his last game in the National Basketball Association, he remains one of the best known names in basketball -- or in any sport. Jordan's name is also one that continues to carry plenty of controversy.

And while his profile is somewhat reduced these days, Jordan was among the many who weighed in on disgraced L.A. Clippers owner Donald Sterling, the man at the centre of the NBA's current racially motivated controversy.

While Jordan was a dominant force on the hardwood, he was often criticized for not playing a 'team' game.


While Jordan was a dominant force on the hardwood, he was often criticized for not playing a 'team' game.

In many respects, Roland Lazenby's career as a sportswriter has paralleled Jordan's as an athlete. Both have strong connections to North Carolina, and Lazenby already covered much ground on Jordan in his 1998 book Blood on the Horns: the Long Strange Ride of Michael Jordan's Chicago Bulls.

While this latest book is by no means a hatchet job, it's in no way an authorized biography of the 51-year-old Jordan. The author had only brief access to him to clarify some information about Jordan's great-grandfather. Further access was denied by the star athlete because Lazenby wouldn't accept Jordan's demand for editorial control.

The author did have access to many of the key figures in Jordan's life and career, including his coaches and teammates at the University of North Carolina, as well as his many connections in the Chicago Bulls organization, including teammates such as Scottie Pippen.

At 691 pages, the book is a bit of an intimidating doorstopper. It goes into great detail about his 1984 arrival in the NBA, including the landmark deal with Nike that guaranteed him riches far beyond what the Bulls were able to pay him as a rookie. From the get-go, as Air Jordan, Michael was both a star athlete and a businessman, more than any other African-American in sports during those years. He no doubt broke ground for others.

Lazenby also tells of Michael Jordan's darker sides, including his love of gambling, which should more properly be described as a serious addiction; Jordan may have lost as much as $5 million shooting craps during the NBA All Star weekend in 2007. Among others betting on those particular dice was Adam (Pacman) Jones of the NFL's Cincinnati Bengals. Gambling was definitely a factor in Jordan's departure from the Bulls, as well as the unhappy end of his first marriage.

Jordan's paternal great-grandfather, Dawson Jordan, was a sharecropper and moonshiner who died when Michael was 14. Another strong influence was his maternal grandfather, Edward Peoples, who also made moonshine. These older men assumed a larger role in Michael's early life because his father, James Jordan, showed him relatively little affection as a boy, preferring to lavish more attention on Michael's older brother Larry.

On the basketball court, Michael Jordan was ferociously competitive, although Lazenby points out that many opponents were openly critical of his dominant style, which reflected something less than a "team" approach to the game.

He also suggests that Jordan took no special national pride in leading the first NBA Dream Team to Olympic gold in Barcelona in 1992. No other country came close to challenging the Americans in that tournament, and Jordan seemed more than a little bored by it all.

After leaving the Bulls, he dallied briefly with the Washington Wizards, and also tried his hand at baseball, perhaps trying to make up for his partial childhood failure as a Little League player. These days, Jordan maintains a high profile in basketball as owner of the NBA's Charlotte Hornets.

The moment that showed the complexity and contradictions that make up Michael Jordan were abundantly clear in September 2009, when he was inducted into the Basketball Hall of Fame.

Sports Illustrated described his performance as the "Exxon Valdez of acceptance speeches," a reference to the 1989 tanker disaster in Alaska. Instead of extending olive branches to anyone, Jordan dumped on many a rival, and singled out a number of people he felt had hurt him along the way. Many were aghast by his remarks, but many others were not overly surprised.

At a number of points in Michael Jordan: The Life, the reader almost gets the feeling that Roland Lazenby might have preferred trashing Jordan, but he couldn't -- when all is said and done, Jordan remains the greatest player the game has known.


Roger Currie is a Winnipeg writer and broadcaster.


Advertise With Us


Updated on Saturday, May 10, 2014 at 8:29 AM CDT: Tweaks formatting.

You can comment on most stories on You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

Have Your Say

New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscribers only. why?

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press Subscribers only. why?

The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective January 2015.

Photo Store

Scroll down to load more