Aaron, you have some ‘splainin’ to do!

Sorkin’s take on I Love Lucy clever, attractive but somewhat airless


Advertise with us

In this behind-the-scenes biopic, writer-director Aaron Sorkin follows a fraught week on the set of the iconic 1950s TV show I Love Lucy.

Read this article for free:


Already have an account? Log in here »

To continue reading, please subscribe:

Monthly Digital Subscription

$4.75 per week*

  • Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
  • Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
  • Access News Break, our award-winning app
  • Play interactive puzzles

*Billed as $19.00 plus GST every four weeks. Cancel anytime.

Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 23/12/2021 (453 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.

In this behind-the-scenes biopic, writer-director Aaron Sorkin follows a fraught week on the set of the iconic 1950s TV show I Love Lucy.

Like many of Sorkin’s projects, Being the Ricardos is a clever — and frequently interesting — exercise. Ultimately, though, it feels airless, mostly because of Sorkin’s habit of viewing his characters — even two as outsized as Lucille Ball and Desi Arnaz (Nicole Kidman and Javier Bardem) — not as distinct human beings but as delivery systems for his stylized dialogue.

As Lucy and Desi work through an exhausting 36-episode television season, they are hit by accusations that Lucy is a communist, with influential columnist Walter Winchell insinuating that more than Lucy’s hair is red. In the stridently anti-communist era of the House Un-American Activities Committee, this political smear jeopardizes both their careers. Meanwhile, tabloid rumours that Desi is cheating threaten their marriage.

To top it off, Lucy is expecting a baby, which scandalizes all the suits from CBS and the show’s sponsor, the Philip Morris tobacco company, because while motherhood is all-American, somehow being visibly pregnant on television is not.

Sorkin is known for his disdain for our new-media universe and its divided, distracted audiences, so it’s not surprising that he’d get nostalgic for a time when 60 million Americans would all tune in to I Love Lucy at the same time.

While being a number one TV hit gives Lucy and Desi tremendous power, Sorkin suggests they are trapped by their success and, as a woman and a Cuban-American, tragically typecast.

This is a serious film about a comedy — which is probably just as well given how badly Sorkin handled the laughs in his short-lived TV series about a live comedy show, Studio 60 on the Sunset Strip. There is quick banter — “I’ll be funny by Friday,” Lucy snaps at one difficult point in the rehearsal process — but the overall tone of Being the Ricardos is surprisingly sombre, even in a black-and-white recreation of the famous scene in which Lucy is stomping grapes.

Being the Ricardos is good-looking, with lots of swell period detail, but it has the slightly claustrophobic feel of an early television set-up.

The cast, which includes Alia Shawkat, Tony Hale and Jake Lacy in the writers’ room, and J.K. Simmons and Nina Ariande as William Frawley and Vivian Vance, who played Fred and Ethel on the show, is uniformly good.

Bardem and Kidman don’t really resemble their real-life counterparts, but they aren’t going for impersonations. Bardem catches Arnaz’s charisma, while Kidman is competent, as always, but somewhat miscast. She’s very good at suggesting Ball’s role as a hard-headed businesswoman and perfectionist performer who will run a scene again and again to get it right, but it’s hard to see her as a madcap, rubber-faced funnywoman.

The drama is marked by the show’s production days — the table read, the camera blocking — all leading up to filming before a live audience. At the same time, we get flashbacks that tell us more about Lucy and Desi’s careers and their passionate, volatile, mutually supportive relationship. (“They’re either tearing each other’s heads off, or tearing each other’s clothes off,” remarks one of their colleagues.) There are also documentary-style interviews, set decades later, with older versions of some of Lucy and Desi’s colleagues.

Sorkin mostly avoids his trademark speechifying, but he does get out a message about the complexity of the creative process and the forces — economic, political and personal — that affect it. Sorkin also seems to be addressing the charge that he can’t write women, and he catches Lucy’s ambition, her intensity, her obsession with the smallest details of her craft — qualities that in 1950s America would seem admirable in a man but are viewed as unbecoming in a woman. “I deal with male egos for a living,” Lucy says at one point.

And while Sorkin is panstakingly recreating a past period, he’s also dealing with the very contemporary notion of “work-life balance.” As Lucy’s career is at its peak, her marriage seems to be falling apart, with Desi’s signature phrase, “Lucy, I’m home!” taking on poignant weight.


If you value coverage of Manitoba’s arts scene, help us do more.
Your contribution of $10, $25 or more will allow the Free Press to deepen our reporting on theatre, dance, music and galleries while also ensuring the broadest possible audience can access our arts journalism.
BECOME AN ARTS JOURNALISM SUPPORTER Click here to learn more about the project.

Alison Gillmor

Alison Gillmor

Studying at the University of Winnipeg and later Toronto’s York University, Alison Gillmor planned to become an art historian. She ended up catching the journalism bug when she started as visual arts reviewer at the Winnipeg Free Press in 1992.

Report Error Submit a Tip


Advertise With Us