August 18, 2017


24° C, A few clouds

Full Forecast


Advertise With Us

Adventure on the high seas a nod to old-fashioned epics

Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 13/6/2013 (1526 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.

Kon-Tiki needed to be made for the simple reason that the world needs to remember that real scientific adventure existed before Indiana Jones.

The 60-some years that have passed since Thor Heyerdahl & Co. set out to prove a far-out theory of human migration by floating across the Pacific Ocean on a balsa wood raft, risking life, limb and reputation on that theory, have let us forget there were once men bold enough to gamble with their lives to prove a scientific point.

Looks like they're going to need a  bigger raft: the Kon-Tiki is menaced by sharks while adrift in the Pacific.


Looks like they're going to need a bigger raft: the Kon-Tiki is menaced by sharks while adrift in the Pacific.

And the fact that DNA testing has almost entirely deflated Heyerdahl's big idea -- that the stone idols of South America look a lot like ones in the South Pacific, and that ancient Peruvians must have migrated west and settled Polynesia -- does nothing to diminish what he and five others proved could be done.

Kon-Tiki is an old-fashioned intimate epic that follows Heyerdahl from childhood -- he never learned to swim, even after falling through the ice on a frozen lake -- into science and the South Pacific, where years of study convinced him that religion, fruits and stone carvings he saw there could only have migrated from the Andes.

We follow him as he pursues backing for his expedition, which much have seemed like the height of folly in the year just after the calamity of the Second World War. Thor (Pal Sverre Hagen) may have the looks of a Nordic god and the hair of a Nordic supermodel -- but America wasn't buying.

National Geographic turns him down. Sailors with real-life raft experience chew him out for his naivet©.

But he assembles a crew, starting with the doughy engineer turned refrigerator salesman Herman (Anders Baasmo Christiansen). He gets together a little money, and others follow -- six men, in all. Leaving his wife behind in Lillehammer, Heyerdahl and his team build a raft probably unlike anything the ancient Peruvians would have known. With a little nudge from the flattered Peruvian government and surplus supplies from the U.S. navy, they were off on their planned 100-day sail-and-drift to Tahiti. Or Fiji.

Tensions rise as they drift, for weeks, in the wrong direction. The foreshadowing is obvious -- a warning that "You fall overboard, you STAY overboard," leads to that first tumble into the sea.

Sharks circle them, and they face the terrors of a storm at sea on a vessel they cannot steer.

"We'll be fine. Have faith," is all Heyerdahl can offer with each new crisis -- balsa wood absorbs water, rope-rigged rafts work themselves apart over time.

"Oh, I have faith," the navigator gripes. "Problem is, I also have a sextant."

They shot a documentary about the voyage that won an Oscar back in 1950, and scenes here recreate that. But the filmmakers use wonderful helicopter shots that emphasize the loneliness of their quest. Even if the balky radio works, who could come to their rescue in 8,000 kilometres of empty ocean?

The film's Heyerdahl comes off as almost fanatically committed to his theory, but doesn't capture the self-promoter he became during this odyssey. More Quixotic charisma was needed, and a better sense of how the world caught Kon-Tiki fever during and after the voyage.

But Kon-Tiki is a grand old-school yarn with enough drama and dramatic incidents to make even Indiana Jones envious at the adventure of it all.

--McClatchy-Tribune News Service

Other voices

Kon-Tiki has a grand, old-fashioned feel -- a man-against-nature adventure that feels like it was made in -- not just set in -- the optimistic post-Second World War era.

-- Cathy Jakcic, Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel


Kon-Tiki is a widescreen man-against-nature epic, beautifully shot (with) seamless, stunning visual effects.

-- Steven Rea, Philadelphia Inquirer


It all combines to create a great true-life adventure of a type no longer seen in the world.

-- Chris Knight, National Post


Upbeat and less exciting than you might wish, though it could be a good adventure film for older kids.

-- Rafer Guzman, Newsday


The characters don't register as much more than genre archetypes, but that doesn't spoil the fun.

-- Ben Sachs, Chicago Reader


Advertise With Us

You can comment on most stories on You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

Have Your Say

New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscribers only. why?

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press Subscribers only. why?

The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective January 2015.

Photo Store

Scroll down to load more