August 17, 2017


14° C, A few clouds

Full Forecast


Advertise With Us

Doctors recommend more freedom for man who beheaded Greyhound passenger

Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 24/2/2014 (1269 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.

Doctors are recommending increased freedom for Vince Li, the mentally ill man found not criminally responsible for a random killing on board a Greyhound bus.

Li appeared in a Winnipeg courtroom this afternoon for his annual Review Board hearing. He was described by his treatment team as a "model patient" who no longer suffers from the type of hallucinations which triggered the 2008 attack near Portage la Prairie.

Vince Li is seen in a file photo.


Vince Li is seen in a file photo.

Tim McLean was killed by Vince Li in July 2008 on a Greyhound Bus near Portage.


Tim McLean was killed by Vince Li in July 2008 on a Greyhound Bus near Portage.

Dr. Steven Kremer, who has worked closely with Li at Selkirk Mental Health Centre, said it’s time to loosen the reins. He proposed three suggestions:

  • Li be allowed unescorted passes into the city of Selkirk, on an incremental basis. Currently, Li is only allowed off-site while escorted. He has taken more than 100 such leaves into Selkirk without incident.
  • Li be allowed more relaxed escorted passes into Winnipeg. Currently, Li must be given one-to-one supervision. Kremer is recommending Li be placed under "general supervision" which will be one worker for every three patients.
  • Li be moved from a locked facility at Selkirk into a more relaxed, unlocked facility.

The Review Board expects to make their decision within a week. But the writing appears to be on the wall, given that the Crown isn’t objecting to the recommendations.

"Mr. Li has done everything that’s been asked of him," prosecutor Susan Helenchilde told court today. She conceded her department is in a difficult position given that they represent the general public and that Li’s actions were so brutal.

"This is one of the most ghoulish tragedies in Canadian history," she said. However, Helenchilde conceded Li’s best interests must be considered following his NCR finding in court.

Li was found not criminally responsible for the beheading of Tim McLean on a Greyhound bus in July 2008 near Portage la Prairie. A judge found Li suffered hallucinations from untreated schizophrenia at the time of the unprovoked attack and ordered him held at the Selkirk centre.

To that extent, Kremer said today that Li knows the importance of staying on his medications for schizophrenia and has shown great insight into what triggered the attack. Li has been deemed a low-risk to re-offend, and Kremer said the only real security concern as Li ventures out into the community is that some member of the public might attack him.

The family of Li’s victim, Tim McLean, were in court today but not allowed to make a presentation to the board. They have been vocal critics of Li’s relaxed freedoms and have pushed for tougher federal legislation.

McLean’s mother, Carol de Delley, believes mentally ill killers such as Li must be held indefinitely in a hospital.

The federal government introduced Bill C-54, the Not Criminally Responsible Reform Act, last year in response to Li’s case. The bill would create a new category of high-risk offenders who can’t be considered for release until a court agrees to revoke the designation. They would not have a review of their status for three years, would not be given unescorted passes and would only get escorted passes under narrow circumstances.

The law would make public safety the main consideration in such cases and ensure victims would be notified when the offender is released. The law could also be applied retroactively.

Advocates said the bill further stigmatizes the mentally ill, incorrectly suggests the likelihood of reoffending is connected to the brutality of the crime, and makes people unnecessarily afraid of those with mental illness.


Advertise With Us


Updated on Monday, February 24, 2014 at 4:54 PM CST: Writethru.

You can comment on most stories on You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

Have Your Say

New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscribers only. why?

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press Subscribers only. why?

The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective January 2015.

Photo Store

Scroll down to load more