August 22, 2017


9° C, A few clouds

Full Forecast


Advertise With Us

Social worker should have asked about Kematch's boyfriend, Sinclair inquiry hears

Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 18/12/2012 (1707 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.

The social worker who paid a house call to Samantha Kematch in 2004 should have asked more questions about her boyfriend, Karl "Wes" McKay, her supervisor told the inquiry into the death of Phoenix Sinclair this morning.

Carolyn Parsons said that intake unit worker Tracy Forbes could have asked Kematch, Phoenix's mother, more about her boyfriend who she learned was staying in the home, including his last name. The following year, Kematch and McKay killed Phoenix, but the five-year-old's death wasn't discovered until 2006. The province called an inquiry into Phoenix's death in 2011. The public hearing, now in its seventh week, began in September.

Phoenix Sinclair, who was in CFS care, was slain by her mother and mother's boyfriend in 2005.


Phoenix Sinclair, who was in CFS care, was slain by her mother and mother's boyfriend in 2005.

On Monday, the inquiry heard from Forbes who testified that she didn't ask for McKay's name or check to see if he had any prior involvement with Child and Family Services. Forbes said that even if she had known about his past criminal record of severe domestic abuse against a partner, she may have still closed the file on the family because there was no proof he ever abused a child.

Forbes was the intake worker assigned to the file in May 2004 when a welfare worker contacted Child and Family Services to report that Phoenix's mother claimed to be caring for her and wanted the four-year-old added to her budget. The welfare worker reported that she was aware of concerns about Phoenix's safety if she was ever returned to either parent.

Forbes said there was no immediate risk to Phoenix that she could see when she met with Phoenix and her mother that summer and their file was closed.

Her supervisor this morning said that if McKay's past was known, she wouldn't have approved of the file being closed at the intake unit.

"We would have had grounds to have him removed from the home if we had some confidence Ms. Kematch would've respected that," said Parsons. They would not have closed the file if they had known his track record of physical abuse, she said.

"The file would be transferred for ongoing services."

Read more by Carol Sanders.


Advertise With Us

You can comment on most stories on You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

Have Your Say

New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscribers only. why?

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press Subscribers only. why?

The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective January 2015.

Photo Store

Scroll down to load more