Arts & Life
Canstar Community News
Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 7/6/2012 (2954 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.
OTTAWA - The federal government used an Ottawa courtroom Thursday to fire back at United Nations criticism that Canada was "complicit" in a human rights violation against three Arab-Canadian men.
The Justice Department dismissed the criticism of the UN Committee Against Torture, which last week called for Canada to apologize to Abdullah Almalki, Ahmad El Maati and Muayyed Nureddin, who were held in Syria after the 9-11 attacks.
The UN panel also called on Canada to compensate the men, who are suing the federal government for its role in their detention abroad. The UN gave the government until next year to issue a formal response.
But the government essentially shot back Thursday at the UN panel during a court hearing in Ottawa for Almalki's lawsuit.
Justice Department lawyer Barney Brucker rhetorically asked Ontario Superior Court Justice Charles Hackland why his court was hearing the case "if the UN really has the last word."
Lawyers for Almalki and the government were arguing a key procedural matter over the disclosure of evidence in the long-running case.
Almalki's lawyers want Hackland to order Ottawa to disclose thousands of pages of documents on their client by the end of September or face the strict sanction of having to argue that their defence should be struck down.
Almalki's lawyers had filed a copy of the UN's recent decision to support their latest motion.
But the government contends the UN finding is irrelevant to the case.
Brucker argued that provisions in Canadian civil law offer the necessary legal protections in the case.
"We don't find them in the Convention Against Torture," he told the judge.
Almalki's lawyer Andrea Gonsalves argued that the federal government is also bound by its international legal commitments.
"The eyes of the world are watching these cases," she said, referring the lawsuits brought by Almalki and the two others.
Almalki, a Canadian citizen, was the subject of an RCMP investigation that sought to prove he was linked to al-Qaida. He was arrested in Syria while visiting family in 2002 and spent two years behind bars, where he was subjected to torture.
The government held a commission of inquiry, headed by former Supreme Court justice Frank Iacobucci, that concluded in 2008 that Canadian officials passed on information about Almalki that was "inflammatory, inaccurate, and lacking investigative foundation."
Iacobucci's report concluded Canadian officials shared unfounded information with foreign governments that the three men were extremists, which was likely partly to blame for their torture.
The men accuse the government of hiding behind Section 38 of the Canada Evidence Act, which allows the government to withhold sensitive information to protect national security.
Almalki sat silently in court during Thursday's 75-minute hearing as the two sides argued the merits of the government disclosing further documentation about him.
Prior to the hearing, Almalki said he wished, in light of last week's UN finding, that the government would admit its complicity in his torture and issue and apology.
"I hope the government would rethink its position of wasting so much money and time," he said.
"All that we see is the government trying to delay the case as much as they could."
Hackland reserved judgment on the motion brought before him Thursday. No date was given for the ruling.
Your support has enabled us to provide free access to stories about COVID-19 because we believe everyone deserves trusted and critical information during the pandemic.
Our readership has contributed additional funding to give Free Press online subscriptions to those that can’t afford one in these extraordinary times — giving new readers the opportunity to see beyond the headlines and connect with other stories about their community.
To those who have made donations, thank you.
To those able to give and share our journalism with others, please Pay it Forward.
The Free Press has shared COVID-19 stories free of charge because we believe everyone deserves access to trusted and critical information during the pandemic.
While we stand by this decision, it has undoubtedly affected our bottom line.
After nearly 150 years of reporting on our city, we don’t want to stop any time soon. With your support, we’ll be able to forge ahead with our journalistic mission.
If you believe in an independent, transparent, and democratic press, please consider subscribing today.
We understand that some readers cannot afford a subscription during these difficult times and invite them to apply for a free digital subscription through our Pay it Forward program.