Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 12/4/2019 (446 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.
WINNIPEG - Manitoba Premier Brian Pallister has produced evidence that he has, after a year of controversy on the subject, paid a luxury tax he owed on his vacation home in Costa Rica.
Pallister showed The Canadian Press this week a document from a treasury department worker in the Costa Rica province of Guanacaste, where his vacation home is located and owned under a corporation called Finca Deneter Doce Sociedad Anonima.
"Guanacaste’s tax administration states that the company Finca Deneter Doce Sociedad Anonima is up to date in the payment of the solidarity tax 2019," reads the one-page document, signed by a revenue technician and stamped with a seal of the treasury department. The document, dated Jan. 30, is in Spanish and was translated by The Canadian Press.
"However, the foregoing does not imply waiver of the collection of tax obligations whose existence is later detected."
Pallister said last August he paid roughly $8,000 in back taxes and penalties. The document he revealed this week does not contain any dollar figures.
The document may put an end to one chapter in the controversy that has dogged the premier about his vacation property and how much time he spends there.
Pallister and his wife purchased the hillside property in 2008. The main bungalow measures 3,400 square feet, according to design plans, and has what Pallister calls a "small finished area" in the basement with a piano and TV room.
There is also a pool, a groundskeeper's quarters and a gym.
A year after Pallister purchased the property, Costa Rica brought in a national tax on homes with a construction value of 100 million colones — about $230,000. The tax is in addition to local taxes, which Pallister says he has always paid, and its threshold rises each year roughly in line with inflation.
The luxury tax is complex. It is not based on market value or estimates filed for construction permits, but instead on the type of building material used in each room, the area covered by each material and other factors.
The tax also relies somewhat on the honour system. Residents are, for the most part, left to file their own property assessments.
Last year, Pallister said he had never been billed for the luxury tax and had been advised that his home did not meet the threshold to pay it. The Costa Rica government maintains an online list of luxury tax debtors, but has not listed Pallister or his holding company.
Pallister promised to look into whether he owed the tax after questions in the legislature and from the media. In August, he admitted he had failed to have his property reassessed every three years as required by Costa Rica law and was being penalized for back taxes.
Since then, Pallister said, his lawyer in Costa Rica has been working on filing an updated assessment and paperwork to pay the luxury tax. A strike by Costa Rica government workers in the fall slowed things down.
"The lawyer began the process and then they went into a public-service general strike, so there's the reason for the delay," Pallister said this week.
Pallister has also faced criticism over the amount of time spent at his vacation property and for saying, on at least one occasion, that he was not there when he was.
In 2016, months after taking office, Pallister said he planned to spend six to eight weeks a year in Costa Rica. He later revised that to five weeks. He has gone twice since mid-December.
Your support has enabled us to provide free access to stories about COVID-19 because we believe everyone deserves trusted and critical information during the pandemic.
Our readership has contributed additional funding to give Free Press online subscriptions to those that can’t afford one in these extraordinary times — giving new readers the opportunity to see beyond the headlines and connect with other stories about their community.
To those who have made donations, thank you.
To those able to give and share our journalism with others, please Pay it Forward.
The Free Press has shared COVID-19 stories free of charge because we believe everyone deserves access to trusted and critical information during the pandemic.
While we stand by this decision, it has undoubtedly affected our bottom line.
After nearly 150 years of reporting on our city, we don’t want to stop any time soon. With your support, we’ll be able to forge ahead with our journalistic mission.
If you believe in an independent, transparent, and democratic press, please consider subscribing today.
We understand that some readers cannot afford a subscription during these difficult times and invite them to apply for a free digital subscription through our Pay it Forward program.