August 21, 2017


16° C, Overcast

Full Forecast


Advertise With Us

Hydro hikes cost of northern dams

Needs generating stations to sell power to U.S. customers

Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 10/3/2014 (1259 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.

Manitoba Hydro has upgraded the cost of the proposed Keeyask generating station to $6.5 billion and added $500 million to the estimated $10.2-billion cost of the Conawapa generating station.

The new costs for the two dams were released Monday at a special hearing of the Public Utilities Board that's examining whether there are alternatives to building the dams.

The proposed Keeyask project.

The proposed Keeyask project.

The $300-million increase to Keeyask's capital costs -- the old estimate was $6.2 billion -- came on the same day Hydro announced a $1.4-billion general civil contract for the dam on the lower Nelson River. It's been awarded to a limited partnership between Bechtel Canada Co., Barnard Construction of Canada Ltd. and EllisDon Civil Ltd. for a proposed in-service date in 2019. Hydro has said it wants to begin construction of the 695-megawatt Keeyask dam this July subject to regulatory approval.

With the increased estimated costs of the two dams, Hydro has reduced its net present value, including benefits to Hydro and taxes and fees to the province, by $800 million.

Despite the higher costs, Hydro told the five-member PUB panel it wants to proceed with both dams as quickly as possible, and on a new transmission line from Winnipeg to Duluth, Minn., to take advantage of a window to sell power to Minnesota and Wisconsin. That window is open for a relatively short period as U.S. utilities close old coal plants to look to add hydro power as part of state-mandated plans to use more renewable energy.

"It's a limited opportunity," Hydro's division manager of power sales, David Cormie, told the PUB on Monday. "They are also making long-term decisions."

Cormie said lobbying by Hydro has convinced its U.S. customers to buy its hydro power rather than them building new plants to produce electricity, such as natural gas-fired combined-cycle combustion turbines.

It's that desire, Hydro says, that drives the need for Keeyask and Conawapa to be built sooner than they are needed to meet domestic demand, as export sales will offset the construction costs of the dams.

Thrown into the mix is Hydro's revised three-year plan to get more Manitobans to conserve electricity. Hydro has been criticized in the past for being too conservative in its Power Smart incentive programs -- also known as demand-side management (DSM) -- and has recently rejigged its conservation targets.

The full details of the revised three-year plan will be publicly released in late April, but has already been discussed at the PUB hearing.

Hydro says the goal of the revised Power Smart incentive program is not only to reduce energy consumption, freeing up more electricity to export to the U.S. and Saskatchewan, but to lower customer bills. Under existing PowerSmart programs,Hydro says participatingcustomerssave anadditional$45millioninelectricityandnaturalgasbillsduring2015-16.

However, questions raised at the PUB's Needs For and Alternatives To hearing is whether increased conservation could see the Keeyask's proposed in-service date pushed back by several years.

During last week's session of the hearing, Hydro's vice-president of portfolio projects, Ed Wojczynski, said under the new DSM targets, the in-service date for Keeyask would be pushed back to 2028. The dam wouldn't be needed for domestic consumption until then.

But Wojczynski cautioned the PUB Hydro does not know how much of the new DSM is going to be adopted by Manitobans, and any delay in Keeyask would further increase its cost.

"With the higher levels of the DSM, a one-year delay in Keeyask would cause at least a $250-million capital-cost increase above and beyond anything else," he said. "And the amount of DSM doesn't change that."


Advertise With Us

You can comment on most stories on You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

Have Your Say

New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscribers only. why?

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press Subscribers only. why?

The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective January 2015.

Photo Store

Scroll down to load more