Duffy reimburses taxpayers $90K

'I am a man of my word': senator


Advertise with us

OTTAWA -- Describing himself as a man of his word, embattled Conservative Sen. Mike Duffy says he has repaid more than $90,000 in Senate housing expenses.

Read this article for free:


Already have an account? Log in here »

To continue reading, please subscribe with this special offer:

All-Access Digital Subscription

$1.50 for 150 days*

  • Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
  • Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
  • Access News Break, our award-winning app
  • Play interactive puzzles

*Pay $1.50 for the first 22 weeks of your subscription. After 22 weeks, price increases to the regular rate of $19.00 per month. GST will be added to each payment. Subscription can be cancelled after the first 22 weeks.

Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 20/04/2013 (3508 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.

OTTAWA — Describing himself as a man of his word, embattled Conservative Sen. Mike Duffy says he has repaid more than $90,000 in Senate housing expenses.

Duffy issued a statement late Friday saying the expenses were repaid in March.

Shortly afterward, a terse statement from the Senate committee on internal economy confirmed Duffy had reimbursed some $90,172.24 in living-allowance expenses, although it didn’t make clear when the payment was made.

CP Sen. Mike Duffy repaid Canadian taxpayers more than $90,000 for a housing allowance to which he was not entitled. The longtime Ottawa resident put in claims for a housing allowance for his P.E.I. cottage (below).

There was confusion much of the day after Duffy — who vowed in February to repay the funds — hinted in a TV report he would only do so if a Senate audit committee required it.

Duffy is a longtime Ottawa resident with a full-time home in the capital, making him ineligible for a subsidy paid to senators whose jobs require them to maintain a secondary residence.

Under the Constitution, senators must reside in the province they are appointed to represent. Duffy represents P.E.I., where he claims a cottage as his primary residence, although neighbours and provincial records suggest he spends little time there.

“I have always said that I am a man of my word,” Duffy, a former broadcaster, said in Friday’s statement. “In keeping with the commitment I made to Canadians, I can confirm that I repaid these expenses in March 2013.”

The statement from the Senate was even more economical. “Sen. Duffy has reimbursed the receiver general $90,172.24 for living-allowance expenses,” it said. “There will be no further comment.”

Duffy issued a statement in February, in the midst of a Senate expense scandal, that said he would repay the funds. “Rather than let this issue drag on, my wife and I have decided the allowance associated with my house in Ottawa will be repaid,” Duffy rewrote.

In a Global TV interview, Duffy said he’d not yet repaid the money and was waiting for the results of the Senate’s own expenses audit before doing so.

“If I was wrong and made a mistake, I’ll repay it,” he said. “And if I wasn’t wrong, I assume that will be reported as well.”

In January, the Senate’s internal economy committee asked senators who were claiming the secondary-residence allowance to prove their primary home was not within 100 kilometres of the capital, as the rules require.


Duffy requested an expedited P.E.I. health card, but the provincial government turned him down. Provincial tax records show Duffy and his wife are identified as non-resident owners of their island cottage.

Even Peter Van Loan, Prime Minister Stephen Harper’s parliamentary House leader, seemed to have trouble keeping the facts straight Friday.

Under questioning from NDP MP Charlie Angus, Van Loan seemed to deny Duffy had ever undertaken to repay the money. “I do not believe he made those comments,” Van Loan said.

A spokesman in Van Loan’s office later said the minister was not disputing Duffy’s promise to repay the money, but rather the comments to Global that he had not yet done so.

— The Canadian Press

Report Error Submit a Tip


Advertise With Us