August 20, 2017


22° C, A few clouds

Full Forecast


Advertise With Us

A strictly by-the-book investigation

Ethics watchdog discusses her limits in the Duffy case

Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 24/5/2013 (1548 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.

OTTAWA -- As the federal ethics commissioner readies for a third look at Stephen Harper's former right-hand man, Mary Dawson is reminding Canadians her office can look only so far.

The commissioner is examining whether Harper's chief of staff, Nigel Wright, violated the Conflict of Interest Act when he gave Tory Sen. Mike Duffy more than $90,000 to repay his housing expenses.

Ethics commissioner Mary Dawson (below) will examine whether Sen. Mike Duffy (above) violated the Conflict of Interest Act or conflict of interest code.


Ethics commissioner Mary Dawson (below) will examine whether Sen. Mike Duffy (above) violated the Conflict of Interest Act or conflict of interest code.


Wright has since quit his job and Duffy has left the Conservative caucus over the issue.

Their dual resignations and Dawson's investigation have been repeatedly cited as steps the government has taken to deal with an issue presenting the Tories their most serious challenge since winning a majority in 2011.

In an interview with The Canadian Press on Friday, Dawson couldn't talk specifically about her probe into the matter, as investigations are confidential.

But she stressed that in all cases, her office must examine whether someone broke specific conflict-of-interest rules, not just that their behaviour or judgment was questionable.

"We do have to find ourselves within the four corners of the act and the code, because it's not fair to the person being complained against just to not be aware what they were accused of," Dawson said Friday.

"Reputations are important, so we take a fair bit of care to make sure we are not falsely concluding anything."

Her office is charged with upholding the Conflict of Interest Act, which governs the actions of some 3,000 public office holders, and the conflict of interest code, which specifically relates to MPs.

Ethics issues involving the Senate are left to the ethics officer there, so whether Duffy himself violated any rules will be decided by that body.

Her office also can't police the entire sphere of ethical behaviour, Dawson said.

An example is the 2009 investigation of the large novelty cheques the federal government was using to hand out grant money.

They were branded with the Conservative party logo -- an activity many felt was a clear breach of ethics.

Except there's nothing in either the Conflict of Interest Act or code that made those cheques a problem, and Dawson concluded as much in her final report.

"Political activities are not particularly covered by either the act or the code," she said in the interview.

"It's important that people realize that maybe there is a lack there. Maybe it's not necessarily for this office to be looking after, but there should be some rules governing political behaviour."

Wright is no stranger to Dawson. Her office was involved in setting guidelines for his work as chief of staff to the prime minister after he left the private equity firm Onex Corp. to work for Stephen Harper.

She also later investigated but cleared him of allegations he'd used his influential position to further private interests of friends at Barrick Gold Corp.

The current investigation into his relationship with Duffy has no apparent connection to Wright's corporate life.

The $90,000 payment has been characterized by the Prime Minister's Office as a gift to Duffy with zero expectation of repayment.

The PMO has also insisted there's no documentation suggesting otherwise.

The Opposition has suggested there is and has demanded the government turn it over.

If there is a paper trail, Dawson's office will turn it up -- eventually.

Getting documents out of the House of Commons or cabinet in a timely fashion has proven a challenge for her in the past, though she said she's never seen a request for documentation completely denied.

"I can only do what I can find, but I have certainly got the power to compel, if necessary, documents, production of documents and witnesses and the person that's alleged to have contravened the act," she said.

"Generally, in fact almost every time, we have no resistance at all."

Dawson said her office moves as fast as it can to investigate, but they are at the mercy of those involved.

Lawyers, resource constraints, even people going away on summer vacation can slow down the process, she said.

RCMP involvement can further complicate things, as the act allows criminal investigations to take precedence. The RCMP is examining the issue of Senate expenses.

-- The Canadian Press


Advertise With Us

You can comment on most stories on You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

Have Your Say

New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscribers only. why?

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press Subscribers only. why?

The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective January 2015.

Photo Store

Scroll down to load more