Arts & Life
Canstar Community News
Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 18/5/2012 (3010 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.
QUEBEC -- The Quebec government brought down the legislative hammer Friday on troublesome protest, introducing a historic-but-controversial emergency law aimed at restoring order in the province.
Following months of social tension and student protests that made international news, and after a legislative debate that spanned a full night, morning and afternoon, the national assembly voted 68-48 in favour of legislation to set temporary limits on protest.
It was among several developments Friday as Montreal also adopted a new anti-mask bylaw, while three of the four people accused of smokebombing the city's subway system were released on bail.
A shared theme in each of those events was the common approach to quelling potential troublemakers: fiscal strangulation.
There are new fines of up to $3,000 for wearing a mask at a Montreal protest, and pricey bail conditions for the accused metro attackers, and they pale in comparison to some of the wallet-crushing penalties laid out in the emergency legislation adopted in Quebec City.
Critics lined up to assail the law as an affront to civil rights, an overreaction, or ill-considered improvisation. They called it a dark day in the province's history, with one law professor even comparing the law to the now-defunct War Measures Act.
The moves provoked a swift, violent reaction from protesters. Molotov cocktails were tossed during a large protest designed as an act of defiance Friday against the legal crackdown.
Police reported an explosive device being launched. A Canadian Press photographer reported seeing at least two and there were other reports of multiple devices being tossed. Projectiles were also tossed at police -- who responded with tear gas and noise bombs.
"Criminal acts were committed," the police said in their Twitter feed.
"(The protest) has been declared illegal. We asked people to disperse immediately."
The protest had been peaceful over its first hour.
Student groups have also promised to launch a court challenge next week. And the subversive international group Anonymous, describing the law as draconian, offered a cryptic warning to the Quebec government: "Expect us."
Still, the Charest government stuck to its defence of Bill 78. It said it would protect the right to peaceful protest, while introducing dozens of measures aimed at ensuring streets and schools return to normal.
The new law is based on three main pillars: It pauses the current school year at institutions affected by strikes, imposes steep fines for anyone who tries blocking access to a school and limits where, how, and for how long people can protest in Quebec.
The law is designed to apply for only a year, and then expire. But that hasn't assuaged the chorus of criticism since it was tabled Thursday night.
Parti Québécois Leader Pauline Marois promised to scrap the legislation as her very first gesture as premier, if she wins an expection expected within a year.
She also promised to limit tuition hikes to the rate of inflation for as long as Quebec has lower university enrolment than the national average.
One thing she did not do is encourage more rowdy protest. Marois urged students to avoid trouble -- and to channel their energy toward the ballot box, not the street.
"The darkest moment always comes before the light," Marois said in the moments before the vote. "It will be time to change the government soon."
In the debate before the vote, the government replied that the PQ had already demonstrated in recent months it would be swayed by mob rule, not by sound policy, if it won power.
"The street would govern the government," said Public Safety Minister Robert Dutil.
He then accused Marois of fomenting student anger in recent months: "You can't complain about the heat of the fire when you've been the one stoking it."
The legislation provides for fines of between $1,000 and $5,000 for any individual who prevents someone from entering an educational institution. Penalties climb to between $7,000 and $35,000 for a student leader and to between $25,000 and $125,000 for unions or student federations.
Bill 78 also lays out strict regulations governing demonstrations, including having to give eight hours' notice for details such as the itinerary, the duration and the time at which they are being held.
Under the legislation, police can order the protest moved to a different spot.
Even offering encouragement for someone to protest at a school -- either tacitly or otherwise -- is subject to punishment.
Amid the torrent of criticism, a portion of the bill was amended to increase the number of people allowed to participate in an organized gathering, from 10 to 50.
Education Minister Michelle Courchesne, less than a week into her new position, raised more than a few eyebrows by mentioning that tweets from the social network website Twitter could also be considered as encouragement to protest.
When asked to clarify, she said she would leave it up the police's discretion to deem what was within the limits of the law. It remains unknown whether "re-tweeting" a potentially illegal message could also land others in hot water.
In a statement made Friday morning, the Quebec Bar Association expressed serious concerns about the bill, calling it excessive. While there were other complaints from within the legal community, the sentiment was not unanimous and some reacted more favourably to the bill.
But the most audible reaction was negative -- ranging from ridicule to downright fury.
Predictably, a coalition of unions and student associations vented their anger Friday, describing Quebec as a "totalitarian state."
"This law is guided by the aggressiveness, anger and revenge of the Liberal party," said the president of the FTQ, Michel Arsenault.
Less predictably, the legislation was also being mocked and attacked by those not at all associated with the cause of striking students.
The chamber of commerce in Gatineau, Que., released a tongue-in-cheek description of its logistical plans for an upcoming event that featured an "assembly of more than 10 people." It concluded the letter with a joke, asking police to inform them how many officers would be present so that they could prepare the appropriate number of hors d'oeuvres.
-- The Canadian Press
The Winnipeg Free Press invites you to share your opinion on this story in a letter to the editor. A selection of letters to the editor are published daily.
Letters must include the writer’s full name, address, and a daytime phone number. Letters are edited for length and clarity.