August 23, 2017


14° C, Overcast

Full Forecast


Advertise With Us

Douglas disciplinary hearing not biased: federal court

Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 28/3/2014 (1244 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.

A federal court has ruled that a disciplinary hearing into the conduct of Court of Queen’s Bench Justice Lori Douglas was not biased and ought not to be suspended.

The ruling, which came out Friday, is the latest twist in the procedurally confusing and drawn out case of the judge accused of sexual harassment after her husband, lawyer Jack King, took and distributed nude photos of Douglas and tried to arrange a sexual tryst with his client.

The federal court’s ruling is, to some degree, moot, because the Canadian Judicial Council panel resigned shortly before the hearings were to begin in federal court. That neutered Douglas’ claim the panel was biased against her.

A new panel was recently created, but it’s not yet clear whether it will now begin hearing the Douglas case anew or whether anyone will appeal the federal court’s ruling.



Advertise With Us

You can comment on most stories on You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

Have Your Say

New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscribers only. why?

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press Subscribers only. why?

The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective January 2015.

Photo Store

Scroll down to load more