July 2, 2020

19° C, Clear

Full Forecast


Help us deliver reliable news during this pandemic.

We are working tirelessly to bring you trusted information about COVID-19. Support our efforts by subscribing today.

No Thanks Subscribe

Already a subscriber?


Advertise With Us

Feds to review border bust that humiliated senior

Motor oil in her van didn't contain heroin after all

Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 25/7/2011 (3264 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.

Janet Goodin, of Warroad, Minn., was strip-searched and jailed on mistaken suspicion of drug offences when she crossed into Canada at Sprague.


Janet Goodin, of Warroad, Minn., was strip-searched and jailed on mistaken suspicion of drug offences when she crossed into Canada at Sprague.

Federal officials will review the arrest of a 66-year-old Minnesota woman who was held at the Remand Centre for 12 days on suspicion of smuggling heroin into Manitoba.

Minister of Public Safety Vic Toews said this afternoon that he has requested a report from the president of the Canada Border Services Agency into the arrest in April of Janet Goodin.

As first reported in today's Winnipeg Free Press, Goodin, a 66-year-old widow and grandmother, said her life was turned upside down this past April after she was arrested at the border after a jar of motor oil in her vehicle was mistaken for heroin.

She was strip-searched by border guards, then turned over to RCMP, who charged her with three trafficking-related offences.  Goodin spent 12 days in jail before a more thorough analysis by the RCMP revealed the jar did not contain heroin.  The charges were eventually dropped.

"Whether there were any errors or changes that need to be made, I'll have to wait until I receive a full report," Toews said.

Toews would not comment on whether the Canadian government would issue an apology to Goodin.

"Whatever actions are appropriate, either CSBA or the government will take," he said.

Goodin said she was heading from her home in Warroad, Minn., to Sprague, Man., to play bingo on April 20 when Canadian border guards at the Sprague port of entry started searching her van and, in a cubby, found a canning jar containing brownish liquid. Sprague is about 30 kilometres northwest of Warroad, which is about 200 kilometres southeast of Winnipeg.

Goodin, who retired after working as an administrative assistant for organizations like Girl Scouts of the U.S.A., said she was shocked after the jar of what she thought was motor oil tested positive for drugs. She said she was handcuffed, interrogated and jailed.

"It was so surreal and so out of context that I just couldn't believe what was happening," she said.

"I have never been so humiliated in my life."

Goodin was subsequently charged with possession for the purpose of trafficking, trafficking and importing a controlled substance. She said the ordeal got worse after she was denied bail and shipped from the Steinbach RCMP detachment to the Winnipeg Remand Centre, where she stayed until a test came back indicating the substance was not an illegal drug.

Her ordeal included strip searches at the border and at the remand centre.

"That means you have to take all of your clothes off one at a time, and they look through all your clothes. You have to stand up against the wall and spread your legs, naked," she said.

"I usually wear a small incontinence pad and they took that away too, to pull it apart."

The mother of six has three grown children in Canada. She said that during dozens of prior visits, she'd had no problems with the jar, which had been put in the vehicle after a tune-up by her son-in-law.

Her only prior run-ins with the law were traffic tickets and a bounced cheque she wrote while living in Florida about a decade ago. The Oldsmobile van she was driving, which is registered in Minnesota, belongs to her daughter.

"We don't have anything to do with drugs," she said.

Lisa White, a spokeswoman for the Canada Border Services Agency, said in a statement "all persons, goods and conveyances entering Canada may be subject to a more in-depth examination."

White said she could provide no specific details about the case due to privacy concerns.

"CBSA officers are trained to look for clues or multiple indicators before referring someone for secondary inspection. CBSA officers consider many factors, including previous infractions, countries visited, nervousness, etc., in assessing who or what might be a risk. When CBSA officers suspect a possible presence of narcotics, a field test will be conducted. These may include narcotic identification tests, spray tests and detector dogs.

"If field tests return a positive result, officers then have probable grounds to suspect the substance is a narcotic. The material will be seized and the person will be arrested and turned over to the RCMP," the statement said.

CBSA official Carl Jarvin, the acting manager of programs for the Prairie region, said the test conducted by the border guards has proven infallible in the past, adding he couldn't explain why there was a false positive in Goodin's case.

RCMP spokeswoman Sgt. Line Karpish said in an email the arrest on April 21 by the Sprague detachment was "based on information gathered and provided by Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA) officers."

Karpish said the exhibit was sent for testing to the Health Canada Laboratory, "with a rush on it." Once the test showed on May 3 the exhibit wasn't a controlled substance, charges were stayed and Goodin was released from custody.

Court documents indicate she was charged with trafficking, possessing and importing heroin (diacetylmorphine), though Karpish didn't say Monday what the test ultimately showed the substance to be.

"We acted in good faith," said Karpish, who said the material "wasn't a controlled substance as we were led to believe."

Scott Newman, Goodin's Winnipeg-based lawyer, said he alerted other defence lawyers to what had happened.

He's concerned about drug tests he said can show "false positives," adding that to this day, he doesn't know the cause of the error.

"All we had was the simple assertion that Canada Border Services says there was a positive test for heroin," he said.

He said he was particularly disturbed someone could be incarcerated "for a lengthy period of time based on a test of dubious reliability."



Advertise With Us


Your support has enabled us to provide free access to stories about COVID-19 because we believe everyone deserves trusted and critical information during the pandemic.

Our readership has contributed additional funding to give Free Press online subscriptions to those that can’t afford one in these extraordinary times — giving new readers the opportunity to see beyond the headlines and connect with other stories about their community.

To those who have made donations, thank you.

To those able to give and share our journalism with others, please Pay it Forward.

The Free Press has shared COVID-19 stories free of charge because we believe everyone deserves access to trusted and critical information during the pandemic.

While we stand by this decision, it has undoubtedly affected our bottom line.

After nearly 150 years of reporting on our city, we don’t want to stop any time soon. With your support, we’ll be able to forge ahead with our journalistic mission.

If you believe in an independent, transparent, and democratic press, please consider subscribing today.

We understand that some readers cannot afford a subscription during these difficult times and invite them to apply for a free digital subscription through our Pay it Forward program.


Updated on Tuesday, July 26, 2011 at 7:15 AM CDT: Corrects spelling of Winnipeg.

1:44 PM: Adds comment from Public Safety Minister Vic Toews.

2:58 PM: corrected minister's title

The Free Press would like to thank our readers for their patience while comments were not available on our site. We're continuing to work with our commenting software provider on issues with the platform. In the meantime, if you're not able to see comments after logging in to our site, please try refreshing the page.

You can comment on most stories on The Winnipeg Free Press website. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or digital subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

Have Your Say

Have Your Say

Comments are open to The Winnipeg Free Press print or digital subscribers only. why?

Have Your Say

Comments are open to The Winnipeg Free Press Subscribers only. why?

By submitting your comment, you agree to abide by our Community Standards and Moderation Policy. These guidelines were revised effective February 27, 2019. Have a question about our comment forum? Check our frequently asked questions.


Advertise With Us