July 12, 2020

24° C, Partly cloudy

Full Forecast

Close this
Winnipeg Free Press



Canadians have reason to spurn Trudeau Liberals


Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 26/7/2019 (352 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.

Canadians are in a foul mood these days when it comes to how they view the federal government, a new Nanos Research poll shows.

Who could blame them?

The deceit, irresponsible spending, vote-buying schemes and attacks on the integrity of Canada’s justice system over the past two years couldn’t possibly make most people feel warm and fuzzy about their government in Ottawa.

When asked in the Nanos survey what feeling best describes their view of the federal government, 53 per cent said either "pessimism" or "anger." Only 30 per cent said "satisfaction" or "optimism."

The gloomy outlook was strongest in the West, not surprisingly. Western alienation, the feeling that Ottawa is out of touch with the needs of western provinces – particularly Alberta – hasn’t been this bad in decades.

The level of optimism and satisfaction towards Ottawa was highest in Ontario, but still only at 38 per cent.

There is no single issue driving this animosity. Governments tend to suffer the death of a thousand cuts over time. However, it is unusual to see a majority government struggling this badly in its first term. The federal Liberals must be doing a lot of things wrong in the minds of the public to be in this much trouble so early in their mandate.

At the top of the list has to be the SNC-Lavalin scandal. Senior federal officials, including Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, attempted repeatedly to politically interfere in the criminal prosecution of SNC-Lavalin, the Montreal-based firm facing fraud and corruption charges. Trudeau admitted as much publicly in a March 7 press conference. The prime minister confirmed he asked then-attorney general Jody Wilson-Raybould to change her mind on the SNC-Lavalin file and spare the company a prosecution.

Minister of Environment and Climate Change Catherine McKenna


Minister of Environment and Climate Change Catherine McKenna

Other senior officials, including Trudeau’s former principal secretary Gerald Butts, also confirmed – during testimony at a Commons justice committee – the many attempts to influence Wilson-Raybould’s decision.

It obviously had a profound effect on how Canadians see their national government.

Not far behind is the federal government’s bungled carbon tax scheme. Ottawa has demanded all provinces charge the tax on various fuels or face a federal one, which Ottawa began implementing this year in four provinces, including Manitoba. They’ve done so without any evidence the tax, which will reach $50 per tonne by 2022, will have any material impact on greenhouse gas emissions. Most of the revenue from the tax will be returned to taxpayers in the form of a rebate. However, small businesses are taking the biggest hit since they will see very little of the tax returned to them.

Meanwhile, federal Environment Minister Catherine McKenna continues to trot around the country arrogantly lecturing Canadians that if they oppose the tax, they don’t care about the environment. That alone has put a sour taste in the mouths of many Canadians.

Then there’s the federal deficit. The Liberals inherited a balanced set of books from the former Harper government in 2015. (There was a surplus in 2014-15 and a small deficit in 2015-16 after the Liberals took over).

Independent Members of Parliament Jane Philpott and Jody Wilson-Raybould


Independent Members of Parliament Jane Philpott and Jody Wilson-Raybould

Trudeau pledged during the 2015 federal election the shortfall would not exceed $10 billion a year. He insisted a Liberal government would balance the books by 2019.

But within their first full year in office, the Liberals posted an $18-billion deficit and spent well beyond their means every year since. Worse, they’re projecting even larger deficits in future years and have no timeline on when they might balance the books. In the meantime, the federal debt has ballooned from $612 billion to $683 billion. It’s expected to eclipse $700 billion by next year.

The federal government is borrowing money to pay for operating expenses in relatively good economic times. And it’s forcing future generations to pay for it.

No wonder most Canadians are angry or pessimistic about their government in Ottawa.

They should be. The Trudeau government’s lackluster response to the social and economic conditions of First Nations alone are worthy of disdain. Despite platitudes about reconciliation and doing right by Canada’s Indigenous people, we still see communities without basic services that non-Indigenous communities take for granted. Attawapiskat in Northern Ontario, which has declared a state of emergency due to contaminated water, is a case in point.

Now, on the eve of an election, the Liberals are trying their level best to buy the support of Canadians (with borrowed money), including propaganda-style ads about beefed-up child benefit cheques and new goodies for first-time homebuyers.

They see the gloom. They’re now pulling out all the stops to avoid the doom.


Tom Brodbeck

Tom Brodbeck

Tom has been covering Manitoba politics since the early 1990s and joined the Winnipeg Free Press news team in 2019.

Read full biography

Your support has enabled us to provide free access to stories about COVID-19 because we believe everyone deserves trusted and critical information during the pandemic.

Our readership has contributed additional funding to give Free Press online subscriptions to those that can’t afford one in these extraordinary times — giving new readers the opportunity to see beyond the headlines and connect with other stories about their community.

To those who have made donations, thank you.

To those able to give and share our journalism with others, please Pay it Forward.

The Free Press has shared COVID-19 stories free of charge because we believe everyone deserves access to trusted and critical information during the pandemic.

While we stand by this decision, it has undoubtedly affected our bottom line.

After nearly 150 years of reporting on our city, we don’t want to stop any time soon. With your support, we’ll be able to forge ahead with our journalistic mission.

If you believe in an independent, transparent, and democratic press, please consider subscribing today.

We understand that some readers cannot afford a subscription during these difficult times and invite them to apply for a free digital subscription through our Pay it Forward program.


Updated on Saturday, July 27, 2019 at 11:08 AM CDT: Corrects to $10 billion.

The Free Press will close this commenting platform at noon on July 14.

We want to thank those who have shared their views over the years as part of this reader engagement initiative.

In the coming weeks, the Free Press will announce new opportunities for readers to share their thoughts and to engage with our staff and each other.

You can comment on most stories on The Winnipeg Free Press website. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or digital subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

Have Your Say

Have Your Say

Comments are open to The Winnipeg Free Press print or digital subscribers only. why?

Have Your Say

Comments are open to The Winnipeg Free Press Subscribers only. why?

By submitting your comment, you agree to abide by our Community Standards and Moderation Policy. These guidelines were revised effective February 27, 2019. Have a question about our comment forum? Check our frequently asked questions.