August 21, 2017


15° C, Overcast

Full Forecast


Advertise With Us

Developer dinged for $170,000

Marquess erected buildings on part of project's park site

Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 11/3/2014 (1258 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.

Developer Andrew Marquess was slapped with a $70,000 penalty and forfeited a $100,000 deposit after altering a park design inside a new condominium project west of McPhillips Street.

City council's property and development committee was told Marquess erected two buildings without permits on a part of his site he had agreed to set aside for a community park.

These multi-family residential buildings encroach on part of the promised park site.


These multi-family residential buildings encroach on part of the promised park site.

Andrew Marquess


Andrew Marquess

"Without coming for a rezoning, (Marquess) built residential units on space that was not zoned appropriately and without permits," committee chairman Coun. Jeff Browaty said.

In addition to losing the $100,000 deposit, the penalty for the loss of parkland was originally set at $250,000 by councillors on the local community committee.

The penalty was lowered to $70,000 on the recommendation of ward councillor Mike Pagtakhan, without objection from the city administration.

The $170,000 will be directed to the Point Douglas ward land-dedication reserve fund, which finances recreational facilities and new park sites.

Marquess said he's being improperly cast as the bad guy in this scenario.

He said he still plans to build a park the same size as the original, only its shape has changed because of the building locations.

Marquess said the park remains 20,400 square feet but will now be T-shaped instead of a rectangle.

He said two buildings encroached on the opposite ends of the original park site, but he provided additional parkland to compensate for land lost to the buildings and all the original park amenities and equipment.

"The administration didn't feel the new design was as usable as it once was," Marquess said, adding he did not dispute losing the $100,000 deposit or the additional $70,000 penalty.

"Whether it's a rectangle or a T-shape, it's still the same size and we're still putting all the playground equipment as before," Marquess said. "I'm moving forward with the park for the community's benefit."

He had bought the townhouse project, known as McPhillips Commons, in 2007. There were already 12 townhouse buildings on the site and Marquess planned to renovate them and construct seven additional buildings for a total of 340 units.

The project, near Mountain Avenue and McPhillips Street west of the Lincoln Hotel, is now known as Terra Commons.

Marquess also bought a city park adjacent to the townhouse project and committed to setting aside the same amount of land as park space in the middle of the development.

The city issued a stop-work order in late May 2013 when staff became aware part of the two buildings had been constructed on portions of the park site.

Browaty said the city can't be faulted for the actions of a developer.

"We don't have an inspector on every corner," Browaty said. "We're doing the best we can to rectify the situation."

As part of the settlement with the city, Marquess will be allowed to finish work on those two buildings.

Browaty said city staff will be closely monitoring how he builds the altered park site, adding the designs must be approved by city staff.

In addition to the Terra Commons project, Marquess is behind the residential redevelopment of the Fort Rouge rail yards and converted the former downtown Sheraton Hotel on Smith Street into apartment units.

Read more by Aldo Santin.


Advertise With Us

You can comment on most stories on You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

Have Your Say

New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscribers only. why?

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press Subscribers only. why?

The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective January 2015.

Photo Store

Scroll down to load more