August 19, 2017


31° C, A few clouds

Full Forecast

Severe thunderstorm watch in effect


Advertise With Us

Groups differ on dams, U.S. line

PUB hearing probes Hydro megaprojects

Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 20/5/2014 (1186 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.

It is either too much, too soon, or it is the best way to meet Manitoba's electricity needs and make a buck.

Those opposing opinions were made Tuesday to the Public Utilities Board as it nears the end of its three-month hearing into Manitoba Hydro's plan to build two new dams and a transmission line into the U.S.

Keeyask Dam Hydro-Electric Generating station

Keeyask Dam Hydro-Electric Generating station

They came from the Green Action Centre and the Manitoba branch of the Consumers Association of Canada in closing arguments to the five-member panel, who wrap up their hearing May 26. The PUB report is due June 20.

Peter Miller of the Green Action Centre says the environmental group supports the development of the Keeyask mega-generating station as soon as possible and the construction of the transmission line to Minnesota, a critical link to the American Midwest not only to export power, but import it when needed.

"The transmission is the key," Miller said. "That is what provides the benefits. We do not necessarily support Keeyask just as a stand-alone project, but this is all system opportunities and it greatly improves the hydro system in terms of the markets that it connects us (to) in terms of the reliability.

"If the northern transmission goes down, now twice as much can be imported to keep the lights on."

However, Miller said Hydro has not made the case why it needs the proposed Conawapa dam, especially with a more aggressive plan by Hydro to increase energy efficiency to make more power available for export. If domestic power demand increases after Keeyask is in service, Hydro should first look at more wind farms to meet demand before starting Conawapa, he said.

Gloria Desorcy of the consumers association said her organization is more critical of Hydro, saying it hasn't justified the need to build Keeyask and the transmission line to the U.S., never mind Conawapa.

Desorcy said rate pressures on Manitobans are too great for the PUB to recommend Hydro go ahead with its development plan.

Hydro has said it wants rate increases of 3.95 per cent annually until 2021 to carry out its building plan, which includes the new Bipole III transmission line to run from northern Manitoba to Winnipeg. However, the PUB held this year's rate increase to 2.75 per cent.

Desorcy said Hydro has failed to fully examine alternatives such as wind and solar power to building the two dams. It's also not proven the export markets in the U.S. will be profitable.

"Let's take the two years that we have before we really need to make a decision to get some of that information that we're missing," she said. "If it turns out that building Keeyask is still the best plan for Manitobans, let's do it with our eyes open and with the proper information."


Advertise With Us

You can comment on most stories on You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

Have Your Say

New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscribers only. why?

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press Subscribers only. why?

The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective January 2015.

Photo Store

Scroll down to load more