June 7, 2020

Winnipeg
13° C, Light rain showers

Full Forecast

Help us deliver reliable news during this pandemic.

We are working tirelessly to bring you trusted information about COVID-19. Support our efforts by subscribing today.

No Thanks Subscribe

Already a subscriber?

Advertisement

Advertise With Us

Opinion

Hockey Winnipeg's strong message

3-year ban for unruly parents puts everyone on notice

Hockey Winnipeg's decision to impose a three-year ban on unruly parents is a history-making decision.

RUTH BONNEVILLE / WINNIPEG FREE PRESS FILES

Hockey Winnipeg's decision to impose a three-year ban on unruly parents is a history-making decision.

Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 2/4/2014 (2257 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.

It would be hard to overstate the significance of Hockey Winnipeg's decision to ban a Winnipeg couple from attending any game, practice, tournament or other official hockey activity for the next three years.

In two important ways, it is a history-making decision.

First, it is the longest ban ever issued to a non-player/non-team official in the history of Hockey Winnipeg. Players and coaches have been suspended for longer, but this is the stiffest penalty ever handed out to someone who didn't have their name on a game sheet.

Second, it was actually publicized.

Most incidents of off-ice misconduct are handled without much publicity. Most are kept within area associations and never make it beyond local gossip.

The more serious incidents that percolate up to Hockey Winnipeg are also, in most instances, kept under wraps.

In this instance, the couple in question -- accused of entering an opposing team's dressing room at a Fargo tournament and starting a physical confrontation with a coach -- wanted to leave open the possibility of appealing their suspension to Hockey Manitoba. As such, there was no longer any prospect of confidentiality.

Don McIntosh, president of Hockey Winnipeg, confirmed his organization has suspended parents or spectators in a few prior situations, but none involving a penalty this severe.

McIntosh agreed most hockey organizations believe their jurisdiction only extends to players and team officials; parents and spectators, while an important element of the game, were considered beyond the disciplinary reach of organized hockey.

Even in instances where a parent or spectator is ejected from an arena by an on-ice official, there were no official reports and often no formal follow up or discipline, he said.

The modern reality, McIntosh said, is hockey governing bodies have accepted they have a role to play in disciplining bad behaviour, both on and off the ice.

That does not mean everyone accepts this as part of the job of overseeing hockey. "There is still a lot of push and pull on this issue," he said.

Why the reluctance? Investigating incidents like the one in Fargo is a lot like trying to figure out right and wrong in a divorce. It is a classic "he said, she said" scenario in which independent evidence is rarely, if ever, available. People will lie, exaggerate and defame without hesitation.

(It deserves to be noted one of the reasons Hockey Winnipeg could make a finding in the case of the Fargo dust-up was evidence from coaches of a third team who witnessed the incident, but were not directly involved in it. Getting genuinely independent witnesses to an off-ice incident is very rare.)

Even if area associations accepted the job of disciplining parents and spectators, few have the capacity to conduct proper investigations or perform adjudications. Most do not pay a retainer for legal counsel (choosing instead to rely on free legal advice from volunteers) and very few understand due process for investigations.

It's well known aggrieved hockey parents can be quick to hire lawyers to overturn suspensions or save reputations. That usually means hockey organizations have to take money set aside for game-related expenses and spend it on legal fees. (It should be noted Hockey Winnipeg budgets $25,000 every year for legal fees.)

In the end, it's not hard to see why hockey volunteers see these incidents as risky. They are administratively onerous and legally perilous. In other words, not worth the trouble.

That is why Hockey Winnipeg and Hockey Manitoba are going to have to spend more time, money and effort investigating and adjudicating incidents involving spectators and parents.

As with any on-ice problems, clear reporting procedures need to be established so every time something off the ice happens, area associations are instructed to get the details into the hands of the senior governing bodies as quickly as possible. Right now, it requires a complaint by an individual or team to trigger involvement from the governing bodies. Or these incidents are handled internally, usually with unsatisfying results.

Area associations do not have the experience, the policy foundation or -- quite frankly -- the financial resources to fairly and efficiently investigate incidents of this kind. That can result in a disservice to both complainant and respondent in any conflict.

Hockey Winnipeg is showing remarkable leadership and sending a strong message to anyone who walks into a hockey arena to mind their behaviour.

The hockey community should follow up and create a process that ensures the guilty are punished, the innocent are supported and the game itself can, once again, become our primary focus.

dan.lett@freepress.mb.ca

Dan Lett

Dan Lett
Columnist

Born and raised in and around Toronto, Dan Lett came to Winnipeg in 1986, less than a year out of journalism school with a lifelong dream to be a newspaper reporter.

Read full biography

Advertisement

Advertise With Us

Your support has enabled us to provide free access to stories about COVID-19 because we believe everyone deserves trusted and critical information during the pandemic.

Our readership has contributed additional funding to give Free Press online subscriptions to those that can’t afford one in these extraordinary times — giving new readers the opportunity to see beyond the headlines and connect with other stories about their community.

To those who have made donations, thank you.

To those able to give and share our journalism with others, please Pay it Forward.

The Free Press has shared COVID-19 stories free of charge because we believe everyone deserves access to trusted and critical information during the pandemic.

While we stand by this decision, it has undoubtedly affected our bottom line.

After nearly 150 years of reporting on our city, we don’t want to stop any time soon. With your support, we’ll be able to forge ahead with our journalistic mission.

If you believe in an independent, transparent, and democratic press, please consider subscribing today.

We understand that some readers cannot afford a subscription during these difficult times and invite them to apply for a free digital subscription through our Pay it Forward program.

The Free Press would like to thank our readers for their patience while comments were not available on our site. We're continuing to work with our commenting software provider on issues with the platform. In the meantime, if you're not able to see comments after logging in to our site, please try refreshing the page.

You can comment on most stories on The Winnipeg Free Press website. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or digital subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

Have Your Say

Have Your Say

Comments are open to The Winnipeg Free Press print or digital subscribers only. why?

Have Your Say

Comments are open to The Winnipeg Free Press Subscribers only. why?

By submitting your comment, you agree to abide by our Community Standards and Moderation Policy. These guidelines were revised effective February 27, 2019. Have a question about our comment forum? Check our frequently asked questions.

Advertisement

Advertise With Us