July 11, 2020

Winnipeg
21° C, Partly cloudy

Full Forecast

Close this
Winnipeg Free Press

ABOVE THE FOLD

Subscribe

Hospital restructuring on life-support

Opinion

Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 8/1/2020 (184 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.

Seven months after the release of a scathing "quality assurance" report by Nova Scotia consultant Dr. David Peachey on the state of the Pallister government’s hospital consolidation plan, it appears little has changed.

Peachey was called in last year to provide a progress report on the implementation of a bold plan, which he had recommended in February 2017, on how to improve Manitoba’s health care system.

Among the recommendations was to consolidate Winnipeg’s six acute care hospitals down to three, while converting three emergency rooms to urgent care centres.

In order to make it work, and to avoid compromising patient care, the plan would require effective strategic planning prior to implementation, Peachey recommended. Hundreds of staff would need to be relocated between hospitals; many would require retraining to take on new roles. Increased resources would be needed, both human and capital, at the three remaining acute care centres to absorb the expected influx of patients. The planning was as important as the changes themselves, Peachey said.

When the Pallister government announced the hospital reform plan in April 2017, then-health minister Kelvin Goertzen and senior officials from the Winnipeg Regional Health Authority assured the public that planning had been completed.

The changes would be carried out in two phases; the first of which occurred that year. The second was scheduled for 2018.

Problems surfaced almost immediately. It became apparent within the first year of implementation that the required planning had not been done (if it was, it was done extremely poorly).

The second phase of the plan — the closure of ERs at Seven Oaks and Concordia hospitals — had to be delayed by more than year because the required staffing and resources at the three remaining acute care hospitals were not in place. Even prior to the implementation of Phase 2, things began to fall apart. After some early success in reducing ER wait times and improving patient flow in hospitals, wait times began to rise again at all hospitals.

Staffing shortages, particularly at St. Boniface Hospital and Health Sciences Centre, got worse. Patient volumes grew at those facilities without adequate increases in staffing and resources to handle the influx. Nurses and other hospital staff began complaining that the system was buckling under. Meanwhile, delays in closing ERs and intensive care units at Seven Oaks and Concordia left those facilities severely short staffed, as doctors and nurses resigned to take positions elsewhere.

It was a mess.

"Nurses have been inadvertently trapped by previously unknown levels of stress, exacerbated by a mixture of unpredictability and under-resourcing that have been fallouts from consolidation," David Peachey wrote in his report. (Mikaela MacKenzie / Free Press files)

"Nurses have been inadvertently trapped by previously unknown levels of stress, exacerbated by a mixture of unpredictability and under-resourcing that have been fallouts from consolidation," David Peachey wrote in his report. (Mikaela MacKenzie / Free Press files)

By May 2019, Peachey was brought back to assess the situation. He confirmed the rollout of the plan was so poorly executed, it was causing severe distress among hospital staff. Some nurses were afraid to go to work for fear they would be forced into overtime shifts they could no longer handle, Peachey found.

"Nurses have been inadvertently trapped by previously unknown levels of stress, exacerbated by a mixture of unpredictability and under-resourcing that have been fallouts from consolidation," Peachey wrote in his report. "It is entirely predictable that the quality of nursing care to patients is and will be compromised."

Seven months later, it appears little has changed. In fact, it seems to be getting worse. The Free Press spoke with nurses from HSC recently who say severe staff shortages and a lack of resources are harming patient care. The Manitoba Nurses Union said last week it may have to urge nurses not to apply for jobs at HSC until the situation improves.

Seven months later, it appears little has changed. In fact, it seems to be getting worse.

The WRHA’s own ER wait time numbers show the situation continues to deteriorate. In June, when Peachey released his quality assurance report, the longest ER wait time at HSC for 90 per cent of patients was 4.97 hours. By November, it grew to 5.5 hours, according to the most recent data. That’s up from 3.38 hours for the same month in 2018.

It’s even worse at St. Boniface Hospital, where wait times grew to 5.92 hours in November, from 4.83 hours in June. In November 2018, it was 4.17 hours.

Regardless of the merits of the consolidation plan, the execution of it has been abysmal. Wait times have been on the rise for at least the past year and staff shortages are compromising patient care.

The government and the WRHA may eventually work out the logistics on this, but they’re running out of time.

tom.brodbeck@freepress.mb.ca

Tom Brodbeck

Tom Brodbeck
Columnist

Tom has been covering Manitoba politics since the early 1990s and joined the Winnipeg Free Press news team in 2019.

Read full biography

Your support has enabled us to provide free access to stories about COVID-19 because we believe everyone deserves trusted and critical information during the pandemic.

Our readership has contributed additional funding to give Free Press online subscriptions to those that can’t afford one in these extraordinary times — giving new readers the opportunity to see beyond the headlines and connect with other stories about their community.

To those who have made donations, thank you.

To those able to give and share our journalism with others, please Pay it Forward.

The Free Press has shared COVID-19 stories free of charge because we believe everyone deserves access to trusted and critical information during the pandemic.

While we stand by this decision, it has undoubtedly affected our bottom line.

After nearly 150 years of reporting on our city, we don’t want to stop any time soon. With your support, we’ll be able to forge ahead with our journalistic mission.

If you believe in an independent, transparent, and democratic press, please consider subscribing today.

We understand that some readers cannot afford a subscription during these difficult times and invite them to apply for a free digital subscription through our Pay it Forward program.

History

Updated on Wednesday, January 8, 2020 at 8:51 PM CST: Fixes typo

The Free Press will close this commenting platform at noon on July 14.

We want to thank those who have shared their views over the years as part of this reader engagement initiative.

In the coming weeks, the Free Press will announce new opportunities for readers to share their thoughts and to engage with our staff and each other.

You can comment on most stories on The Winnipeg Free Press website. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or digital subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

Have Your Say

Have Your Say

Comments are open to The Winnipeg Free Press print or digital subscribers only. why?

Have Your Say

Comments are open to The Winnipeg Free Press Subscribers only. why?

By submitting your comment, you agree to abide by our Community Standards and Moderation Policy. These guidelines were revised effective February 27, 2019. Have a question about our comment forum? Check our frequently asked questions.