Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 4/3/2019 (486 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.
UNDER orders from the Pallister government, Manitoba Hydro has cancelled a program that would have paid $4.2 million to six rural municipalities inconvenienced by a new transmission line cutting across their boundaries.
The southeast Manitoba municipalities learned the program would be cancelled earlier this year. No formal agreements had been signed.
Hydro spokesman Scott Powell said the program was developed for municipalities impacted by the proposed Manitoba-Minnesota Transmission Project. The $453-million project, now in the final licensing phase, would expand Hydro’s capacity to sell power to the United States.
Powell said he wanted to make clear the program was not designed to buy municipalities’ silence. "They were free to oppose. This had nothing to do with their support for the line," he said.
The money would have been doled out based on the population of each municipality and the number of kilometres of transmission line passing through them. It was similar to a program offered to municipalities affected by the Bipole III transmission line. Hydro started talking to municipalities about the initiative in March 2017, he said.
However, in late November, Hydro was instructed by the Progressive Conservative government to cancel the program.
"We have to be in line with provincial government policy, and we’ve brought our policy regarding these agreements in line with the province’s," Powell said Monday.
He said the program’s cancellation does not affect payments to landowners who will be directly affected by the transmission towers and lines.
The Free Press asked to speak with Crown Services Minister Colleen Mayer about the move, but received an emailed statement from her instead.
Mayer said no formal agreements were in place with the municipalities, so no deals were broken.
"Our government has a mandate to spend taxpayers’ dollars wisely. Under the previous NDP government such benefit agreements were handed out without any verification of real impacts, and that’s no longer acceptable," Mayer said.
"Benefits will still be available to communities and landowners, but from now on Manitoba Hydro will need to verify and document real impacts."
The rural municipalities that would have received the cash were: Stuartburn, Piney, Springfield, Tache, La Broquerie and Ste. Anne.
The municipalities the Free Press contacted Monday were not surprised by the province’s policy directive — given the government’s well-known desire to reduce costs — and had not been counting on the cash, although they said it would have been put to good use.
Anne Burns, chief administrative officer with La Broquerie, said her municipality was told the money would be available for "a community project."
She said it was told it was eligible for $900,000. Hydro informed the RM by letter Feb. 4 no money would be coming, she said.
Christine Hutlet, CAO of the RM of Tache, said the money was never guaranteed. She said Hydro never told the municipality how much it would receive.
She said, unlike individual landowners, the municipality would not be adversely affected by the transmission line, other than suffering a possible decrease in property assessment.
"I wasn’t shocked (by the government’s decision). And I don’t believe council was shocked either," Hutlet said. "It’s a little disappointing, but with all of the cutbacks that we’re seeing, provincial and otherwise, it wasn’t a surprise."
A year ago, the Pallister government ordered Hydro not to proceed with a $67.5-million agreement with the Manitoba Metis Federation. Part of that deal called for the MMF not to oppose the Manitoba-Minnesota Transmission Project.
Meanwhile, Powell said Manitoba Hydro still plans to have the transmission line in service by June 2020.
He said the project will boost Hydro’s export capacity to 3,185 megawatts from about 2,300 megawatts. The new line will also double the amount of power it can import from the United States — to 1,400 megawatts — in an emergency.
Larry Kusch didn’t know what he wanted to do with his life until he attended a high school newspaper editor’s workshop in Regina in the summer of 1969 and listened to a university student speak glowingly about the journalism program at Carleton University in Ottawa.
Your support has enabled us to provide free access to stories about COVID-19 because we believe everyone deserves trusted and critical information during the pandemic.
Our readership has contributed additional funding to give Free Press online subscriptions to those that can’t afford one in these extraordinary times — giving new readers the opportunity to see beyond the headlines and connect with other stories about their community.
To those who have made donations, thank you.
To those able to give and share our journalism with others, please Pay it Forward.
The Free Press has shared COVID-19 stories free of charge because we believe everyone deserves access to trusted and critical information during the pandemic.
While we stand by this decision, it has undoubtedly affected our bottom line.
After nearly 150 years of reporting on our city, we don’t want to stop any time soon. With your support, we’ll be able to forge ahead with our journalistic mission.
If you believe in an independent, transparent, and democratic press, please consider subscribing today.
We understand that some readers cannot afford a subscription during these difficult times and invite them to apply for a free digital subscription through our Pay it Forward program.