August 22, 2017


11° C, A few clouds

Full Forecast


Advertise With Us

Judge forced to toss rape case

Blames officer's conduct as key evidence tainted

Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 25/2/2014 (1273 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.

A Manitoba judge is blaming police misconduct for sinking what prosecutors believed was a strong case against an alleged high-risk Winnipeg rapist who is now back on the streets.

All of the key evidence against the accused, Marcus Baird, was tossed out of court recently after the lead officer involved in the case was found to have deliberately committed numerous charter breaches.

Provincial court Judge Robert Heinrichs slammed the conduct of Det. Richard Arndt while ruling on a pre-trial motion last month, of which the Free Press has now obtained a transcript.

"This court has found that there was reckless disregard for the truth in Detective Arndt's sworn application. The inaccuracies, misstatements, embellishments and exaggerations are such that they permeate the entirety of the document," Heinrichs wrote in his decision.

The Crown conceded Arndt made numerous factual errors in his information to obtain a search warrant but claimed they were all "honest mistakes" that should be overlooked.

Heinrichs disagreed, saying this was done maliciously by the officer.

"It can be fairly characterized as an attempt to trick the reader into drawing a conclusion that simply would not have been there if there had been full, fair and frank disclosure," Heinrichs said.

Specifically, the judge ruled Arndt deliberately withheld certain information, while exaggerating other details, in order to convince a magistrate to issue the all-important search warrant in the Baird investigation. The end result was making the police case look much stronger than it really was, he said.

"All uncertainties or contradictions had been removed from the picture Detective Arndt created," Heinrichs wrote.

As a result of the deception, Heinrichs deemed this "an unreasonable search and seizure" that left the Crown with no evidence left to proceed. A stay of proceedings was formally entered earlier this month. Baird, 28, was accused of breaking into two residences and sexually assaulting two women, both strangers, on April 4 and 5, 2011. Police and the Crown also suspected him of voyeurism for recording the incidents on camera.

Sources told the Free Press justice officials were considering a dangerous-offender application for Baird if convicted on the grounds he poses an extreme risk to public safety. That would have allowed him to be jailed indefinitely with no guarantee of ever being released.

Now he is a free man following the judicial ruling.

Baird has a lengthy history with police and was the subject of regular surveillance at the time of the attacks, court was told. He was identified as a suspect but not arrested for these incidents until July 2011.

However, Baird was picked up in mid-April 2011 for two other alleged sex assaults of young sex-trade workers. His car was impounded and held at the Public Safety Building while he was held in custody without bail.

After identifying him as a suspect in the two earlier home invasion rapes, police applied for the warrant to search Baird's seized vehicle and obtained several pieces of evidence that were key to their prosecution, including clothing and video equipment, according to testimony at the voir dire.

A Winnipeg police spokesman told the Free Press Tuesday they are aware of the judicial decision and are reviewing it with their "justice partners." The Crown has 30 days to decide whether it wishes to file an appeal. "This was a complicated investigation that involved multiple incidents and we are confident that this review will provide valuable insights for the future," Const. Jason Michalyshen said in a statement.

Read more by Mike McIntyre.


Advertise With Us

You can comment on most stories on You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

Have Your Say

New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscribers only. why?

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press Subscribers only. why?

The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective January 2015.

Photo Store

Scroll down to load more