August 21, 2017


15° C, Overcast

Full Forecast


Advertise With Us

Judge's words trigger complaint

Province, protesters decry comments in rape case

Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 25/2/2011 (2368 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.

The province will file a complaint with the Canadian Judicial Council over remarks made by a federally appointed judge at a sexual assault sentencing in Thompson last week.

Jennifer Howard, minister responsible for the status of women, said Friday she is concerned the judge's comments will cause future victims to fear they will be blamed for attacks against them.

Noisy protesters gather outside the Law Courts building over the lunch hour Friday to voice disapproval of comments by Justice Robert Dewar.


Noisy protesters gather outside the Law Courts building over the lunch hour Friday to voice disapproval of comments by Justice Robert Dewar.

At a sentencing hearing Feb. 18, Court of Queen's Bench Justice Robert Dewar suggested a victim's attire and flirtatious behaviour were partly to blame for the attack, which involved forced intercourse.

The judge called the attacker, Kenneth Rhodes, a "clumsy Don Juan" and noted the victim wore a tube top, high heels and plenty of makeup. He gave Rhodes a conditional sentence -- no jail time -- of two years, rejecting a Crown suggestion of at least three years behind bars.

The judge's remarks unleashed a firestorm of protest on Thursday when they came to light in a Free Press story. Politicians of all stripes joined student and feminist groups and those who work with sexual assault victims in decrying the comments. Many said they feared Dewar's remarks -- which included "sex was in the air" the night the woman was raped -- would deter other victims from coming forward in the future.

"I feel it's important, and we as a government feel it's important, to send a message to women... that they should feel protected by the law..." Howard said in explaining the government's decision to launch the complaint.

By Friday afternoon, the judicial council, which has authority over more than 1,100 federally appointed judges, had already received "several" complaints about Dewar's handling of the case, according to a spokeswoman. She said it is the council's policy not to disclose the names of complainants.

Earlier in the day, more than 100 women and men held a noisy protest outside the downtown Law Courts building. They chanted "yes means yes and no means no," and waved signs sporting an array of messages including, 'Clumsy, ignorant judge,' and 'FYI, Dewar, this is the 21st century.'

Many who attended the demonstration called on the judge to apologize for his remarks and to resign.

Alanna Makinson, head of the Manitoba branch of the Canadian Federation of Students, said Dewar's comments reinforce "repressive and illogical ideas" about women and their sexuality.

"The reality is that violence is committed against women because the perpetrator chooses to commit that violence -- end of story," she said.

Erin Vosters, with the feminist collective FemRev, said she was appalled by the judge's reasoning in giving Rhodes a lenient sentence.

"It makes me feel sick to think that this kind of misogyny is so acceptable that it can be used in, and legitimized by, the courts," she told the crowd.

Vosters said it's absurd to think any person invites a violent attack by dressing in a certain way.

While most of the demonstrators Friday were women, about 20 men also showed up.

One of the speakers at the protest said the judge's comments were equally offensive to men.

"I think you should be as outraged, if not more so, by the portrayal of your sexuality," University of Winnipeg politics professor Shannon Sampert told the men in the crowd. "You know when a woman says 'no' it's not a mixed message. Don't let Dewar say that you have no control over your sexuality. You do."

A spokeswoman for the Manitoba Justice Department said Friday the Crown has ordered a transcript of the Rhodes sentencing and will review whether there are grounds for appeal. It has 30 days to do that.

Anyone can file a complaint against a judge with the Canadian Judicial Council. After investigating a complaint, the council can make recommendations that include removing a judge from office. The council says on its website it handles most complaints within three months.

The council is investigating the conduct of another Manitoba judge, Lori Douglas, who is embroiled in sex-scandal allegations.

Read more by Larry Kusch.


Advertise With Us


You can comment on most stories on You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

Have Your Say

New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscribers only. why?

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press Subscribers only. why?

The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective January 2015.

Photo Store

Scroll down to load more