August 20, 2017


25° C, A few clouds

Full Forecast


Advertise With Us

Katz sold firm back to Sheegl for "closure"

Deal happened days after mayor scorned for purchase

Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 17/10/2012 (1767 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.

Mayor Sam Katz says he sold an Arizona shell company back to Phil Sheegl for $1 for "closure."

This morning, Katz said he decided to give the company, Duddy Enterprises LLC, back to Sheegl following media criticism over the transaction. He said if he kept the company the media would've continued to report about it, and he didn't want that grief and aggravation.

Mayor Sam Katz


Mayor Sam Katz

"There wasn't any conflict of interest. There never was. I still believe the easiest thing to do is bring closure to this," Katz said.

In March, Katz purchased Duddy Enterprises LLC from Sheegl, the city's chief administrative officer and the mayor's close friend. In September, the sale sparked questions about Katz and Sheegl's personal relationship and their business dealings in Arizona.

Katz initially said he was a victim of a "witch hunt" and insisted the transaction wasn't untoward. He said he bought the dormant shell company for $1.

Both Katz and Sheegl later conceded the sale was not a good idea due to the optics of the exchange between senior city officials. At the time, Katz said he would have paid money to hire a lawyer and set up his own company if he had to do it again, calling the experience a "valuable lesson learned."

One week later, Arizona Corporation Commission documents show Katz sold the shell company back to Sheegl. Sheegl signed an agreement on Sept. 22, and online corporation commission records reveal Sheegl officially took over as company manager on Oct. 9.

'Not a business relationship': mayor

Katz had declined to speak to the Free Press on Wednesday about the sale.

But today Katz answered questions on the subject while at a flag-raising ceremony marking the 75th anniversary of credit unions in Manitoba. He said he is not in a business relationship with Sheegl.

"That's not a business relationship. We don't have any business together," he said. "I don't have any businesses other than the ones you and everyone else knows about."

Sheegl declined to comment Wednesday.

The resale of Duddy Enterprises comes one month after Katz was forced to answer questions about his activities in Arizona, when it was revealed he acquired a home in Scottsdale's upscale Windgate Ranch development from the sister-in-law of Sandy Shindleman, the head of Shindico Realty.

Katz defended the property's purchase, but declined to answer questions about how long he's lived there or why the tax bill was sent to his Winnipeg home the year before he took possession of the property.

The mayor has bought and sold several Scottsdale properties during the last decade, but has refused to disclose how often he travels there, insisting it's a personal matter.

'Disappointing and inappropriate': councillor

Coun. Jenny Gerbasi (Fort Rouge) called the Duddy Enterprises transaction "disappointing and inappropriate" and said this kind of continued behaviour should stop. She said it creates the perception two people in positions of power are mixing business and personal relationships, jeopardizing the public's trust.

"They're in the highest position of powers politically and administratively and they're doing business transactions with each other," Gerbasi said. "That is going to stir up public mistrust and concern."

The shell company was first incorporated in Arizona in late 2002, and there is no information available to the public on the type of business for which Duddy Enterprises was incorporated. Sheegl was the company's manager until he sold it to Katz earlier this year.

The Arizona Corporation Commission requires businesses to report when there is a change in the company's directors or shareholders in person, by mail or by fax. However, it does not require companies to report any financial transactions or the purchase price of a company.

There are no rules compelling members of city council to disclose properties and businesses they own outside Winnipeg.

In early 2009, city council voted to call on the province to beef up Winnipeg's conflict-of-interest rules and create an ethics watchdog or a new position to govern Manitoba municipalities.

Little has happened since then, and Gerbasi said the city still needs better legislation to ensure there are consequences to breaching the code of conduct.

-- with files from Bartley Kives


Advertise With Us


Updated on Thursday, October 18, 2012 at 10:15 AM CDT: Updates with comments from Mayor Sam Katz.

1:50 PM: Reformats story.

You can comment on most stories on You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

Have Your Say

New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscribers only. why?

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press Subscribers only. why?

The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective January 2015.

Photo Store

Scroll down to load more