August 24, 2019

Winnipeg
29° C, Overcast

Full Forecast

Advertisement

Advertise With Us

Opinion

Avoiding great expectations proving a good strategy so far

Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 18/4/2012 (2683 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.

Every government that has ever tabled a budget prefers to under-promise and over-deliver. Governments like to create modest expectations in budgets for how well they can do in areas like spending restraint and revenue growth. And if they spend less, or generate more revenue, they tend to look good. Or lucky. Or both.

Jean Chrétien's federal Liberal government was a master of this strategy. Starting shortly after coming to power in 1993, Chrétien and his finance minister, Paul Martin, brought in budgets that always seemed to have underestimated revenues. That meant they also annually underestimated the budget surplus.

Billions and billions of dollars in unexpected surpluses rolled into the federal treasury. That made Chrétien and Martin seem like fiscal magicians, and it helped build support for a succession of majority Liberal governments.

But were the Liberals deliberately underestimating so they could over-deliver? Or was this a more cynical political strategy, where a government deliberately lowballed its forecasts so it seemed to be perpetually doing better than even its best guesses?

Keep reading free:

Already have an account? Log in here »

Keep reading free:

Already have an account? Log in here »

Subscribers Log in below to continue reading,
not a subscriber? Create an account to start a 30 day free trial.

Log in Create your account

Your free trial has come to an end.

We hope you have enjoyed your trial! To continue reading, we recommend our Read Now Pay Later membership. Simply add a form of payment and pay only 27¢ per article.

For unlimited access to the best local, national, and international news and much more, try an All Access Digital subscription:

Thank you for supporting the journalism that our community needs!

Your free trial has come to an end.

We hope you have enjoyed your trial! To continue reading, we recommend our Read Now Pay Later membership. Simply add a form of payment and pay only 27¢ per article.

For unlimited access to the best local, national, and international news and much more, try an All Access Digital subscription:

Thank you for supporting the journalism that our community needs!

We hope you have enjoyed your free trial!

To continue reading, select a plan below:

All Access Digital

Introductory pricing*

99¢

per month

  • Unlimited online reading and commenting
  • Daily newspaper replica e-Edition
  • News Break - our award-winning iOS app
  • Exclusive perks & discounts
Continue

Read Now Pay Later

Pay

27¢

per article

  • Commitment-free
  • Cancel anytime
  • Only pay for what you read
  • Refunds available
Continue

*Introductory pricing schedule for 12 month: $0.99/month plus tax for first 3 months, $5.99/month for months 4 - 6, $10.99/month for months 7 - 9, $13.99/month for months 10 - 12. Standard All Access Digital rate of $16.99/month begins after first year.

We hope you have enjoyed your free trial!

To continue reading, select a plan below:

Read Now Pay Later

Pay

27¢

per article

  • Commitment-free
  • Cancel anytime
  • Only pay for what you read
  • Refunds available
Continue

All Access Digital

Introductory pricing*

99¢

per month

  • Unlimited online reading and commenting
  • Daily newspaper replica e-Edition
  • News Break - our award-winning iOS app
  • Exclusive perks & discounts
Continue

Mon to Sat Delivery

Pay

$34.36

per month

  • Includes all benefits of All Access Digital
  • 6-day delivery of our award-winning newspaper
Continue

*Introductory pricing schedule for 12 month: $0.99/month plus tax for first 3 months, $5.99/month for months 4 - 6, $10.99/month for months 7 - 9, $13.99/month for months 10 - 12. Standard All Access Digital rate of $16.99/month begins after first year.

We hope you have enjoyed your free trial!

To continue reading, select a plan below:

All Access Digital

Introductory pricing*

99¢

per month

  • Unlimited online reading and commenting
  • Daily newspaper replica e-Edition
  • News Break - our award-winning iOS app
  • Exclusive perks & discounts
Continue

Read Now Pay Later

Pay

27¢

per article

  • Commitment-free
  • Cancel anytime
  • Only pay for what you read
  • Refunds available
Continue

*Introductory pricing schedule for 12 month: $0.99/month plus tax for first 3 months, $5.99/month for months 4 - 6, $10.99/month for months 7 - 9, $13.99/month for months 10 - 12. Standard All Access Digital rate of $16.99/month begins after first year.

We hope you have enjoyed your free trial!

To continue reading, select a plan below:

Read Now Pay Later

Pay

27¢

per article

  • Commitment-free
  • Cancel anytime
  • Only pay for what you read
  • Refunds available
Continue

All Access Digital

Introductory pricing*

99¢

per month

  • Unlimited online reading and commenting
  • Daily newspaper replica e-Edition
  • News Break - our award-winning iOS app
  • Exclusive perks & discounts
Continue

*Introductory pricing schedule for 12 month: $0.99/month plus tax for first 3 months, $5.99/month for months 4 - 6, $10.99/month for months 7 - 9, $13.99/month for months 10 - 12. Standard All Access Digital rate of $16.99/month begins after first year.

Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 18/4/2012 (2683 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.

Every government that has ever tabled a budget prefers to under-promise and over-deliver. Governments like to create modest expectations in budgets for how well they can do in areas like spending restraint and revenue growth. And if they spend less, or generate more revenue, they tend to look good. Or lucky. Or both.

Jean Chrétien's federal Liberal government was a master of this strategy. Starting shortly after coming to power in 1993, Chrétien and his finance minister, Paul Martin, brought in budgets that always seemed to have underestimated revenues. That meant they also annually underestimated the budget surplus.

Billions and billions of dollars in unexpected surpluses rolled into the federal treasury. That made Chrétien and Martin seem like fiscal magicians, and it helped build support for a succession of majority Liberal governments.

But were the Liberals deliberately underestimating so they could over-deliver? Or was this a more cynical political strategy, where a government deliberately lowballed its forecasts so it seemed to be perpetually doing better than even its best guesses?

It was never proven one way or the other that Chrétien and Martin deliberately lowballed their forecasts. Martin claimed, with some plausibility, he would take a range of forecasts and then come down on numbers that were somewhere between the most optimistic and the most cautious. And the simple fact was Canada's economy, from the mid-1990s until the mid-2000s when the Liberals ruled this country, ran hotter for longer than it ever had before. So hot, it would have been difficult to overestimate revenues.

Did Manitoba do the same? For the most part, this province did do better than it projected on revenues. At the same time, it also managed to spend close to what it budgeted. A C.D. Howe Institute report last year found Manitoba had one of the best records of spending to budget. From 2000 to 2011, Manitoba overspent its budget by 2.4 per cent. Only Quebec and New Brunswick had better records.

Some may argue that accomplishment is like being the tallest midget at the circus, but it still acknowledges Manitoba spends close to what it budgets.

There have been exceptions, of course. Last year, Manitoba's forecasts were upended by record floods, which cost Manitoba nearly $900 million. Adding nearly $200 million in other, unanticipated expenditures, Manitoba racked up a $1.1-billion deficit. Talk about underperforming.

Fast-forward to fiscal year 2012-13, which began this week with the tabling of the provincial budget. With no immediate threat from Mother Nature, the province once again forecasts modest increases in economic growth and revenues. These forecasts are based on models developed by the province, with data from third parties, including the Conference Board of Canada and most of the large and medium-sized chartered banks.

Is this going to be a return to the "under-promise and over-deliver" years? With no threat of another catastrophic weather event, the province might find savings in excess of its $128-million target, and a lower deficit than the $460 million it has forecast. Neither of those numbers is particularly daunting. But there are threats to that scenario.

In Manitoba, when it's not too wet, it's too dry. This summer, drought conditions have been forecast to prevail in some parts of the province. That usually means increased costs to government, whether to support farmers or combat drought's best friend — the forest fire.

But there are additional threats beyond weather events. Continuing uncertainty about the strength of the global economy will be an issue.

And this week, Bank of Canada governor Mark Carney once again warned Canadians about the prospect of higher interest rates.

Although Carney was talking directly to consumers, government is also vulnerable to rate hikes. Manitoba is already paying more than $800 million in debt-servicing costs annually. Even a small boost in interest rates would drive that number up and put deficit projections in doubt.

Manitoba's debt is not wildly out of control; the debt-to-GDP ratio is still among the best in the country. However, every million dollars in increased debt-servicing is another million dollars that must be trimmed from program costs or added to the deficit.

This year, the province has a fighting chance to improve on its budget targets. However, it must have near-perfect conditions for that to happen. With a bit of luck, this government will find nirvana: a world of lower expectations and higher results.

dan.lett@freepress.mb.ca

Dan Lett

Dan Lett
Columnist

Born and raised in and around Toronto, Dan Lett came to Winnipeg in 1986, less than a year out of journalism school with a lifelong dream to be a newspaper reporter.

Read full biography

Advertisement

Advertise With Us

You can comment on most stories on The Winnipeg Free Press website. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or digital subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

Have Your Say

Have Your Say

Comments are open to The Winnipeg Free Press print or digital subscribers only. why?

Have Your Say

Comments are open to The Winnipeg Free Press Subscribers only. why?

By submitting your comment, you agree to abide by our Community Standards and Moderation Policy. These guidelines were revised effective February 27, 2019. Have a question about our comment forum? Check our frequently asked questions.

Advertisement

Advertise With Us