Hey there, time traveller! This article was published 15/6/2012 (2903 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.
A woman in a poor neighbourhood such as Point Douglas will die, on average, 16 years earlier than a woman in a middle-class neighbourhood like Richmond West.
Things are a little better for poor men. Their lives are only 13 years shorter than wealthier men.
That's one of hundreds of grim statistics assembled in recent years by the Manitoba Centre for Health Policy, which, taken together, paint a bleak picture of the huge health gap between rich and poor in Manitoba.
Life expectancy is a bellwether, one of the best and bluntest measures of overall health. MCHP director Patricia Martens frequently uses the figures to illustrate just how stark Winnipeg's health gap is.
She likens it to a bus ride up Pembina Highway. For every couple of stops closer to Winnipeg's downtown, a rider loses a year of life. If the rider continues north up Main Street, he gains those years back.
To put the figures in perspective, Martens says curing cancer would only add three years to the average life expectancy in North America. So, a 13- to 16-year difference between Winnipeggers in rich and poor neighbourhoods points to an extreme health disparity.
What makes Winnipeggers in neighbourhoods such as William Whyte, Point Douglas and Burrows die so young?
"It's not very satisfying, but the answer is everything," said MCHP researcher Randy Fransoo. "Whatever is going around that's bad, the poor are going to have more of it."
That means higher rates of chronic diseases, more trips to the hospital and even lower screening for breast cancer.
The latest updates on the novel coronavirus and COVID-19.
In core neighbourhoods such as William Whyte and Lord Selkirk Park, more than a third of people have a mental illness. In Fort Garry, the number doesn't crack 20 per cent.
Diabetes, among Manitoba's most serious health threats, is nearly twice as common in poor urban neighbourhoods than in the wealthiest ones.
The rate of teen pregnancies in the inner city is seven times higher than in the southern suburbs.
Nearly half of all children who have cavities so severe they need surgery come from the poorest 20 per cent of children. Fransoo says that stat makes the hairs on the back of his neck stand up.
But the news isn't all bad. In some areas, such as breastfeeding, the gap is closing, and the health of inner-city neighbourhoods has improved in recent years, just not as fast as in richer neighbourhoods.
And, researchers have found creative programs, such as the province's Healthy Baby program, can nudge health outcomes in the right direction.
The Healthy Baby program, which gives poor, pregnant women an extra $80 a month and some targeted support before and after their baby is born, can dramatically shrink premature births and low birth weights and boost breastfeeding.
It was the extra cash, less than $3 a day, that sparked the biggest improvement.
"We thought, 'It's a great idea, hopefully it will help, but it's probably not gonna change the world,' " said Fransoo. "But, it did. It was just astounding."
What might make poor kids healthier?
THAT'S the next big question the Manitoba Centre for Health Policy will try to answer.
The centre is one year into a massive, five-year project that will evaluate more than a dozen child-health programs scattered all over the province. Researchers will study everything from anti-bullying programs and suicide-prevention projects to prenatal and newborn-baby outreach and many others.
The centre for health policy has access to a data gold mine -- actual health files of thousands of real patients, minus any names and identifying information. They can use that data to see, for example, how a baby who was part of a specific prenatal program in a rural health authority fared later in life.
That's what researchers will do for the dozen-plus programs, allowing them to tell which ones improved a child's health over the long haul and which ones government ought to invest in or expand.
The idea is to close the huge health gap between middle-class kids and poor ones, to "raise and level the bar," according to the current catchphrase.
Your support has enabled us to provide free access to stories about COVID-19 because we believe everyone deserves trusted and critical information during the pandemic.
Our readership has contributed additional funding to give Free Press online subscriptions to those that can’t afford one in these extraordinary times — giving new readers the opportunity to see beyond the headlines and connect with other stories about their community.
To those who have made donations, thank you.
To those able to give and share our journalism with others, please Pay it Forward.
The Free Press has shared COVID-19 stories free of charge because we believe everyone deserves access to trusted and critical information during the pandemic.
While we stand by this decision, it has undoubtedly affected our bottom line.
After nearly 150 years of reporting on our city, we don’t want to stop any time soon. With your support, we’ll be able to forge ahead with our journalistic mission.
If you believe in an independent, transparent, and democratic press, please consider subscribing today.
We understand that some readers cannot afford a subscription during these difficult times and invite them to apply for a free digital subscription through our Pay it Forward program.