August 23, 2017


14° C, Light rain showers

Full Forecast


Advertise With Us

Afghanistan -- the bitter end

Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 6/2/2014 (1293 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.

Politically, we may have a vague idea of what exactly will happen in Afghanistan after 2014. Economically, however, we can quite accurately predict Afghanistan will return to its former life of poverty.

Even the riches that supposedly rained on Afghanistan between 2002 and 2013 didn't ease its agony. Most of the money never reached it. According to estimates, out of each dollar earmarked for that country, only 14 cents reached it. Yet, it was still a lot of money for a country with a yearly per capita income of less than $300.


The money that actually made its way to Afghanistan was either stolen outright or spent on projects that were badly conceived, shoddily constructed or never got off the ground. And only relatives of the political elite or people otherwise close to it got most of the contracts.

That wouldn't be the worst of all scenarios if the newly rich had invested their money in their country. But they didn't. They preferred to park their money in foreign banks or buy real estate in foreign countries.

In short, after a massive inflow of funds, the Afghan government, backed by the international community, has neither built a functioning economy nor created a self-sufficient financial foundation to pay the country's bills.

Whatever might happen to Afghanistan's economy after 2014, it will be inconsequential to 95 per cent of Afghanistan's population. Nothing will change in their lives. They were either low-paid salaried employees of the government or eked out a subsistence living by farming their tiny plots of land before the United States invaded their country. They will continue to be inefficient and low-paid government employees or go on working their land after the U.S.-led international community leaves Afghanistan.

This vast majority of Afghans was utterly neglected by both the Afghan authorities and the donor community. It was as if these mainly illiterate and poverty-stricken people didn't exist. They were considered, it seems, to be a faceless mass with no needs, no wants and no hopes. Nobody seriously bothered to devise a sensible and practicable plan to help them better their lives.

Here are a few examples of Afghanistan's economic strength and where help should have been concentrated: The country's cotton yield, once a valuable commodity for foreign and internal markets, has declined to a mere 15 per cent of its former harvest. Fruits have always been a mainstay of Afghanistan's agricultural production. Planeloads of fresh fruits were flown abroad. The production and exportation of dried fruits was another profitable item and provided reliable jobs for large numbers of people.

To revive these sectors, the growers and producers needed help with accessing improved seeds and saplings to upgrade their products and rebuild their decimated tree stocks. They needed refrigerated storage centres to prolong the shelf life of their merchandise so they could sell it gradually at stable prices, avoiding having to rush to the market and dumping their wares at any price to prevent it from rotting before their eyes.

Another way to help the peasants would have been to teach them how to clean, sort and pack their products professionally, enabling them to sell their goods in richer markets in order to secure higher profits. Instead, Afghan authorities and foreign experts installed generators in some villages.

Most of the affected villagers did not know how to operate and service the machines. Moreover, they lacked the money to buy the diesel to run them.

Helping this large segment of Afghan society would have not been expensive. In the virtually cashless and unimaginably impoverished Afghan countryside, the dollar goes far and much could have been done with less if people with some imagination and goodwill had gone about the task.

Neither has much progress taken place in other sectors of the economy. For example, Afghanistan once had a vibrant textile industry, employing thousands of workers. Today, there is no textile manufacturing to speak of. While billions of tons of limestone await processing, cement factories remain closed or operate marginally, and 95 per cent of the country's cement is imported.

Most of the country has no electricity. The large power plant USAID built outside Kabul at a cost of more than $200 million is shut down. Its diesel-operated generators are extremely expensive to run and the Afghan government can't pay for it.

At the moment, the city of Kabul purchases most of its electricity from Tajikistan and the international community pays for it. Who will cover the cost post-2014 is not clear. What is clear is the Afghan administration lacks the fund to pay the bill.

In describing this utterly negative situation, I am not trying to imply nothing positive has been achieved in Afghanistan. Many schools have been opened. Girls are free to go to school and more than a million do. Kabul University has been partially rebuilt and is back in business. Some roads and bridges have been built and others repaired. Some of what has been done will continue and some may not be sustainable. What I believe must be said, however, is both the international community and the Afghan government have failed to lift Afghanistan out of its pre-2001 broken condition. When the rich flow of money becomes a trickle or stops altogether, the warlords will resume their previous fight for resources and the protection of their fiefdoms.

Afghanistan is today and will remain after 2014 a failed state with all the perils that entails both for the U.S. and the international community.


Nasir Shansab is a former leading Afghan industrialist and is the son of Afghanistan's once minister of agriculture. Forced to leave his country in 1975, Shansab now lives in Washington D.C. and holds dual U.S. and Afghan citizenship. He is the author of Silent Trees: A Novel of Afghanistan, set in Afghanistan prior to the Soviet invasion.


--Allen Media Strategies LLC


Advertise With Us

You can comment on most stories on You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

Have Your Say

New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscribers only. why?

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press Subscribers only. why?

The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective January 2015.

Photo Store

Scroll down to load more