May 28, 2020

11° C, Light rain showers

Full Forecast

Help us deliver reliable news during this pandemic.

We are working tirelessly to bring you trusted information about COVID-19. Support our efforts by subscribing today.

No Thanks Subscribe

Already a subscriber?


Advertise With Us


Contradictory values fuel assisted-dying debate

JOHN WOODS / WINNIPEG FREE PRESS</p><p>A religious statue at St Boniface Hospital in Winnipeg.</p>


A religious statue at St Boniface Hospital in Winnipeg.

Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 28/6/2017 (1065 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.

The Free Press published Dan Lett’s strongly felt and very personal challenge to St. Boniface Hospital’s refusal to allow deliberate ending of life ("The torturous ethics of assisted dying," June 24).

In response, let me express my personal views. I was the medical director of palliative care at St. Boniface during the service’s first 15 years. I am not a Roman Catholic. I have publicly supported medical assistance in dying (MAID). Here are some considerations to counter Lett’s views:

First, a perspective on the historic position of St. Boniface. Second, a reality check on Lett’s presentation. Finally, a suggestion for resolution, specifically for the Winnipeg Regional Health Authority in relation to the hospital.

St. Boniface still embodies the Grey Nuns’ mission. They brought hospital service to Manitoba. The quality of caring has made it a place where Dr. Marcus Blouw likes to work, even though he disagrees with the hospital’s position on MAID.

If St. Boniface were forced to allow MAID, the Catholic Health Corporation of Manitoba would have to abandon the hospital. I fear that their historic commitment to compassionate care would be reduced.

"Times change," but trends come and go rapidly while old values persist.

What was recently the dominant value can become that of a minority.

The new law has defined an exception to the prohibition of taking a person’s life — that is, to murder. It allows MAID; it does not force MAID on anyone.

If St. Boniface holds its position on MAID, as it has held its position on abortion, the consequence for health service in Winnipeg will be equally small. How much gain and how much loss if the hospital holds firm?

Lett has displayed some unrealistic thinking. In his distress over his mother’s decline and suffering, he wonders "what my family would have elected to do (etc.)."

By law, MAID can only be provided in response to a request by a competent person and not by proxy; family may support or reject the person’s request but family has no authority.

And, Lett concludes with the impossible "hope that secularists and people of faith can agree on (how people can) prove themselves to God." For the faithful, God is the basis of understanding life and of living morally, while for secularists there is no place in discussion for a non-existent "God."

Finally, can we live in a society with contradictory values?

I suggest that facilities which provide MAID could establish a procedure to receive transferred patients. A doctor in St. Boniface can discharge a patient. There is time to transfer; time for assessment of a request is required by law. A transfer can be made comfortably.

Does anyone think St. Boniface would block the transfer of a competent patient by countering a doctor’s discharge order?

Dr. Paul D. Henteleff is founding president of the Canadian Palliative Care Association.


Advertise With Us

Your support has enabled us to provide free access to stories about COVID-19 because we believe everyone deserves trusted and critical information during the pandemic.

Our readership has contributed additional funding to give Free Press online subscriptions to those that can’t afford one in these extraordinary times — giving new readers the opportunity to see beyond the headlines and connect with other stories about their community.

To those who have made donations, thank you.

To those able to give and share our journalism with others, please Pay it Forward.

The Free Press has shared COVID-19 stories free of charge because we believe everyone deserves access to trusted and critical information during the pandemic.

While we stand by this decision, it has undoubtedly affected our bottom line.

After nearly 150 years of reporting on our city, we don’t want to stop any time soon. With your support, we’ll be able to forge ahead with our journalistic mission.

If you believe in an independent, transparent, and democratic press, please consider subscribing today.

We understand that some readers cannot afford a subscription during these difficult times and invite them to apply for a free digital subscription through our Pay it Forward program.

The Free Press would like to thank our readers for their patience while comments were not available on our site. We're continuing to work with our commenting software provider on issues with the platform. In the meantime, if you're not able to see comments after logging in to our site, please try refreshing the page.

You can comment on most stories on The Winnipeg Free Press website. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or digital subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

Have Your Say

Have Your Say

Comments are open to The Winnipeg Free Press print or digital subscribers only. why?

Have Your Say

Comments are open to The Winnipeg Free Press Subscribers only. why?

By submitting your comment, you agree to abide by our Community Standards and Moderation Policy. These guidelines were revised effective February 27, 2019. Have a question about our comment forum? Check our frequently asked questions.


Advertise With Us