July 9, 2020

Winnipeg
19° C, Overcast

Full Forecast

Close this

Advertisement

Advertise With Us

Opinion

It's time to give Mincome another look

Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 19/8/2012 (2880 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.

Big Bill was a longtime client and volunteer at Winnipeg Harvest.

He lived in a downtown hotel. He couldn't always use the shower down the hall because it didn't always work. He wore all his clothes all the time, because he knew somebody would steal any he left in his room.

As a result, Big Bill struggled with hygiene and other issues. But he still came to help others at Winnipeg Harvest who were even less fortunate than he was.

Then he changed! His appearance greatly improved. He was clean. He wore a new set of clothes and a new sense of self-esteem. But what had changed?

Bill turned 65. Suddenly, the system that had treated him so badly began to respect him and his income needs as a citizen.

He got access to decent housing and he could afford to buy groceries to cook in his own kitchen.

This proves that when we want, we have the capacity to design and deliver a system that works and values the citizen.

Why can't we do the same every day, for every Canadian?

In the mid-1970s, the people of Dauphin didn't have to go to work. But they did anyway.

That's one of the remarkable findings of a study into the 1974 to 1978 social experiment that provided a guaranteed annual income to every individual and family in the Manitoba town.

The program, known as Mincome, "ensured there would be no poverty in Dauphin. Wages were topped up and the working poor given a boost," Lindor Reynolds wrote in the Winnipeg Free Press three years ago.

Prof. Evelyn Forget of the University of Manitoba has studied Mincome. Her research confirms that the primary wage earners in Dauphin didn't quit their jobs. People who benefited from the program continued working as school janitors, hair stylists and housekeepers.

But now they had a little extra money to help raise their kids, they told Reynolds.

Forget plotted the hospitalization rate for accidental injuries and mental illness in Dauphin against the average for rural Manitoba hospitals.

Before Mincome, Dauphin was significantly above average in hospital admissions for both accidents and mental illness.

As soon as the experiment began, both rates fell sharply and soon were significantly below average. When Mincome ended, both rates gradually increased, but did not surpass the average.

Forget once told a group of doctors, including the chief public health officer, implementing a guaranteed annual income would save taxpayers' money in the long run, based on reduced hospital admissions alone.

Every day at Winnipeg Harvest, we see the results of people not having enough money to buy the food they and their children need.

When Winnipeg Harvest was invited to speak before a Senate committee in 2008, we proposed a guaranteed annual income as a way to ensure all Canadians have enough to eat.

To promote a greater understanding of the Dauphin experiment, Winnipeg Harvest and Food Matters Manitoba are co-sponsoring a workshop with Forget on Aug. 21. It's time to give guaranteed income another look.

 

David Northcott is the executive director of Winnipeg Harvest.

Advertisement

Advertise With Us

Your support has enabled us to provide free access to stories about COVID-19 because we believe everyone deserves trusted and critical information during the pandemic.

Our readership has contributed additional funding to give Free Press online subscriptions to those that can’t afford one in these extraordinary times — giving new readers the opportunity to see beyond the headlines and connect with other stories about their community.

To those who have made donations, thank you.

To those able to give and share our journalism with others, please Pay it Forward.

The Free Press has shared COVID-19 stories free of charge because we believe everyone deserves access to trusted and critical information during the pandemic.

While we stand by this decision, it has undoubtedly affected our bottom line.

After nearly 150 years of reporting on our city, we don’t want to stop any time soon. With your support, we’ll be able to forge ahead with our journalistic mission.

If you believe in an independent, transparent, and democratic press, please consider subscribing today.

We understand that some readers cannot afford a subscription during these difficult times and invite them to apply for a free digital subscription through our Pay it Forward program.

The Free Press will close this commenting platform at noon on July 14.

We want to thank those who have shared their views over the years as part of this reader engagement initiative.

In the coming weeks, the Free Press will announce new opportunities for readers to share their thoughts and to engage with our staff and each other.

You can comment on most stories on The Winnipeg Free Press website. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or digital subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

Have Your Say

Have Your Say

Comments are open to The Winnipeg Free Press print or digital subscribers only. why?

Have Your Say

Comments are open to The Winnipeg Free Press Subscribers only. why?

By submitting your comment, you agree to abide by our Community Standards and Moderation Policy. These guidelines were revised effective February 27, 2019. Have a question about our comment forum? Check our frequently asked questions.

Advertisement

Advertise With Us