NEW Delhi is India’s capital city. It is also an Indian state with its own government. On Feb. 8, the State of Delhi held elections. The main contestants were the Aam Admi (Common Man) Party (AAP), the state wing of Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Bhartiya Janata (Indian People’s) Party (BJP) and the iconic Congress Party of India.
As millions of Delhiites went out to cast ballots, the election became a referendum on Modi’s polarizing policies at the national level. Modi’s BJP is backed by and heavily influenced by India’s leading Hindu nationalist organizations; Shiv Sena (SS) and the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS).
Some even argue the BJP is simply the political wing of these nationalist entities that are promoting and agitating for "Hindutva," whose proponents present it as a return to India’s natural state, featuring Hinduism at its core, while critics call it a hegemonic imposition of "Hindu-ness" on India’s cultural, social, religious and political systems.
Delhi became a battleground and a test of the BJP’s legislative initiatives, such as the Citizenship Amendment Act (CCA) and the National Citizen’s Register (NCR), which have been heavily criticized for being thinly veiled attempts to target Muslims as part of the BJP’s Hindu-nationalist agenda.
During the campaign, the incumbent AAP presented a platform for social development and unity, while the BJP and its allies tried to nationalize the campaign by invoking rival Pakistan and the "Muslim threat" faced by India’s Hindu population. At public rallies, the BJP’s Kapil Mishra called AAP leader Arvind Kejriwal a traitor, and added that traitors deserved a bullet.
The BJP made a grand wager by turning Delhi’s election into a debate on nationalism and betting that Indians would ignore bread-and-butter economic issues in favour of an emotional pull toward their religious core. The strategy seemed to have worked in the 2019 national election, which returned a massive BJP majority to office.
But in Delhi, the BJP’s big wager returned a resounding defeat, as Kejriwal’s AAP picked up 72 of 80 seats compared to the BJP’s eight. While Delhiites soundly rejected the BJP’s call to nationalist arms, the campaign exposed a perilously polarized and divided India.
The BJP and its allies unleashed a divisive campaign that offered a Hindu India in which minorities, including Christians and Muslims, were presented as threats to India’s greater aspirations. Its campaign rhetoric became so vitriolic that even senior BJP leaders such as Manoj Tiwari later conceded that its defeat in Delhi could be attributed to divisive and communally charged speeches by some BJP leaders.
As the plebiscite on Modi’s nationalist agenda played out in Delhi, secularist Indians came out to protest while incendiary comments by BJP leaders and surrogates appeared to bring violent BJP supporters into the mix.
Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU) student protesters became victims of an attack by masked men, while
Jamia Millia Islamia (JMI) students were shot at least twice by young men apparently responding to the call to shoot traitors. During a Jan. 5 mob attack at the JNU campus, three students — Khushbu Sharma, Akshay Shete and Kaifi Ansari — survived while masked men injured 39 of their fellow protestors, some seriously. They also watched campus police stand by and allow the attacks to occur.
Sharma and Shete are high-caste Hindus and the latter is well familiar with the indoctrinating tactics of the RSS, once having been a youth field worker for the cause. Ansari is Muslim. All three consider the CAA and the NCR to be inherently anti-Muslim.
For Ansari, the CAA, the NCR and the Delhi campaign are isolating and alienating; as an Indian who happens to practise Islam, being told to "Go back to Pakistan" is humiliating and deeply hurtful. In this environment, she admits to being made to feel "less Indian."
Sharma and Shete see the CAA and the NCR as only the beginning. Their protest is not only for fellow Indians like Ansari, but also for India’s secular soul. They believe if Hindutva prevails, religious minorities won’t be the only lesser Indians; given the country’s multi-layered social structure, they fear it won’t be long before Hindutva will demand stratified rights based on caste differences, even amongst Hindus.
As students like Ansari, Shete and Sharma protest to defend their rights, many of those whose rights are at risk support the BJP’s vision of a Hindu India. Amongst the working class of Delhi, many from lower-caste Hindu families, there is a strong belief that the BJP is working on their behalf.
When asked about the pending Delhi election, the driver from one of Delhi’s posh hotels frequented by foreigners responds, "The BJP should win." Asked if the AAP had done anything to help his family, he mentions the introduction of free education and health care for Delhiites. And then asked why he supported the BJP, he replies, "Someone has to deal with the desh drohis (enemies of the nation)."
And that is the great Indian divide. While Ansari, Shete and Sharma fight for the driver’s place in a future India, the driver sees them as enemies of the nation. Which view prevails will dictate India’s future. And there are countless battles yet to come before that future reveals itself.
Sudhir Sandhu is chief executive officer of Manitoba Building Trades. He recently traveled to India, where he was born and resided until his mid-teens.
Your support has enabled us to provide free access to stories about COVID-19 because we believe everyone deserves trusted and critical information during the pandemic.
Our readership has contributed additional funding to give Free Press online subscriptions to those that can’t afford one in these extraordinary times — giving new readers the opportunity to see beyond the headlines and connect with other stories about their community.
To those who have made donations, thank you.
To those able to give and share our journalism with others, please Pay it Forward.
The Free Press has shared COVID-19 stories free of charge because we believe everyone deserves access to trusted and critical information during the pandemic.
While we stand by this decision, it has undoubtedly affected our bottom line.
After nearly 150 years of reporting on our city, we don’t want to stop any time soon. With your support, we’ll be able to forge ahead with our journalistic mission.
If you believe in an independent, transparent, and democratic press, please consider subscribing today.
We understand that some readers cannot afford a subscription during these difficult times and invite them to apply for a free digital subscription through our Pay it Forward program.