September 25, 2017

Winnipeg
12° C, Overcast

Full Forecast

Advertisement

Advertise With Us

The ABCs of rape: What consent is and isn't

Lately, there has been some confusion about when you need consent. In too many discussions of rape cases, people are blaming everyone but the person responsible -- Miley Cyrus, say, or the "culture," or the victim.

Montana District Judge G. Todd Baugh recently let off with a 30-day sentence a teacher, Stacey Dean Rambold, who raped a 14-year-old. And in the course of doing so, Baugh pointed out the victim was "older than her chronological age" and that "it wasn't this forcible, beat-up rape."

In apologizing for one of his lousy sentences, the judge later said he was "not sure just what I was attempting to say, but it did not come out correct."

Which is pretty terrible as apologies go.

Subscribers Log in below to continue reading,
not a subscriber? Create an account to start a 30 day free trial.

Log in Create your account

Add a payment method

To read the remaining 343 words of this article.

Pay only 27¢ for articles you wish to read.

Hope you enjoyed your trial.

Add a payment method

To read the remaining 343 words of this article.

Pay only 27¢ for articles you wish to read.

Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 5/9/2013 (1480 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.

Lately, there has been some confusion about when you need consent. In too many discussions of rape cases, people are blaming everyone but the person responsible — Miley Cyrus, say, or the "culture," or the victim.

Montana District Judge G. Todd Baugh recently let off with a 30-day sentence a teacher, Stacey Dean Rambold, who raped a 14-year-old. And in the course of doing so, Baugh pointed out the victim was "older than her chronological age" and that "it wasn't this forcible, beat-up rape."

Miley Cyrus and Robin Thicke

Miley Cyrus and Robin Thicke

In apologizing for one of his lousy sentences, the judge later said he was "not sure just what I was attempting to say, but it did not come out correct."

Which is pretty terrible as apologies go.

I'm sure what he meant to say was, "Women are people, rape is rape, I'm going to go rethink my life and, gee, these sentencing guidelines are kind of screwy."

Not "forcible"? That doesn't mean there was consent.

And consent is not optional.

People need to stop treating consent as if it's nice but not required, like holding doors open for people or carrying mints. They also need to stop treating consent as if it's implied if you are female and ever pick up a drink.

Consent is not... you are a woman who left the house wearing (item of clothing my grandmother does not own).

Consent is not... you seem pretty mature.

Consent is not... you climbed out of the bowels of a teddy bear and gyrated.

Consent is not... you sang along with Blurred Lines and giggled.

Consent is not... well, I didn't have to club you and drag you back to my cave.

Consent is not... you are my student.

Consent is making certain that the other adult you are about to have sex with wants to have sex with you. Notice: adult. Children and most teenagers cannot consent, and they especially cannot consent if you are their teacher, an adult in a position of power over them. At that age, brains are not fully developed even if bodies are.

There are many decisions we as a society have decided teenagers are not capable of making, even if we allow them to dictate all movies that come to theatres. The fact a teenager feels capable of making a decision does not mean the teenager is actually capable, as anyone who has been a teenager or wrestled car keys away from a teenager will tell you.

And if you fail to get permission, because your partner is too young to consent, or too drunk, or any other reason — this is on you.

This should go without saying. But somehow, it doesn't.

 

This was excerpted from Alexandra Petri's blog at washingtonpost.com/blogs/compost


— The Washington Post

Advertisement

Advertise With Us

You can comment on most stories on The Winnipeg Free Press website. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

Have Your Say

New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.

Have Your Say

Comments are open to The Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscribers only. why?

Have Your Say

Comments are open to The Winnipeg Free Press Subscribers only. why?

The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective January 2015.