In doing so, he also indicated that he had been noticing a very clear pattern of WFP "news reports" omitting any quotes from, or indeed often omitting to mention the presence of, a federal Conservative MP at announcements involving joint federal/provincial funding. He wondered whether in fact a federal MP had been involved in the announcement referred to in the article and why the WFP would characterize this particular initiative as solely "the new way in how the Selinger government will fund addictions treatment".
A good question especially since a federal MP - Joy Smith I am advised - was present and this type of initiative is certainly an approach that our government supports.
The fact that the WFP continues to minimize the Conservative government's involvement in these types of initiatives is not startling. As a general rule the input of a federal Conservative MP is sought only when there is an attempt by the WFP to cast the Conservative government in a bad light.
At the same time no comment from or a minimal reference to any participation by our federal government is the general rule when the story is generally positive.
As I told my constituent, I don't expect a political opponent to tell the full story when it comes to talking about our government's initiatives. And in Manitoba, the partisan political efforts of the WFP are no exception to that expectation.
Vic, so you know it was me and me alone who chose to ignore Joy Smith. I also ignored Manitoba’s Housing and Community Development Minister Kerri-Irvin Ross and Point Douglas city councillor Mike Pagtakhan, who both also spoke at the announcement. (If you’re curious about what they had to say, the official news release is posted here).
It’s not because I have any real political bias – I can be anyone’s patsy. That’s how I flow.
I just thought none of them had anything interesting to say. I guess in a way you could say not only did I ignore a federal Tory, but I also ignored an NDP cabinet minister and a Liberal city councillor. My bias that day was spread equally among each party.
I was content that day to only quote Heather Leeman, executive director of the North End Women’s Centre, and a client of the centre’s services, Rosalee Genaille. In my estimation what they said mattered more than three politicians slapping themselves on the back.
In walking back to my car I had a quick chat with Jim Rondeau, the province’s Healthy Living minister and one of the provincial government’s main people responsible for addiction services. He didn’t speak at the announcement, but was there as a guest.
We stood in the shade at the corner of Selkirk Avenue and Aikins Street and talked about our summer holidays and the pros and cons of owning a cottage.
That’s when he volunteered his comments about the new transitional housing centre just announced.
Rondeau’s recently been under fire for ignoring addiction services, so I thought what he had to say had a bit of news value. So I quoted him.
Was it the right call? Who knows? These days it seems the only time I make the right decision is when I agree with my wife and kids.
Anyway Vic, that’s my story and I’m sticking to it.
And Vic, next time we bump into one another, let’s chat. We’ve known each other a long time from our court days. I can be your patsy, too, OK?