Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 23/2/2015 (1957 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.
Every time I check out at the drugstore, I have the same thought: It sure costs a lot of money to host Aunt Flo. I've had my period 18 years and will likely have it for two more decades. Over my lifetime, I will spend a good chunk of change on the red dot.
For me, though, "that time of the month" is a minor inconvenience. For those who are living in poverty or are experiencing homelessness, it can be incredibly challenging. Many are forced to stretch their stocks of menstrual product, get creative or go without. And as anyone who has ever had to fashion an 'artisanal' maxi pad out of toilet paper because they had the misfortune of being marooned by the crimson tide without a pad or a quarter will tell you, this is neither an effective or comfortable alternative.
'It's one of the most–requested, least–received items'
During cold snaps such as the one we're currently experiencing, our charitable focus turns to warm clothing and food, but we shouldn't forget about pads and tampons when we're making donations to food banks or shelters. The demand for them is always high -- they are an essential need, after all -- but they are often forgotten about.
In January, Winnipeg Harvest had 6,909 requests for menstrual products. Just 125 of those requests were able to be filled. The organization breaks up boxes and bags in an effort to make supplies go around. That means each of those 125 people received about six to eight pads or tampons.
"It's one of the most-requested, least-received items," says Deb Swereda, an agency assistant at Winnipeg Harvest. She notes because menstrual products have long shelf lives, the major retailers from which Harvest reclaims goods can always sell them -- unlike, say, a dented can. And when it comes to personal donations, people tend to think food when they think Winnipeg Harvest, not menstrual -- or even general -- hygiene products.
Still, it's as Swereda says, if someone can help someone out with hygiene products, it can take the pressure off the household budget.
Osborne House, which provides a safe space for women experiencing, domestic abuse, and Resource Assistance for Youth (RaY), which works with street-entrenched youth up to the age of 29, also accept menstrual-product donations. Encouragingly, Alex White, director of communications and development at RaY, tells me the organization has never had trouble getting menstrual-product donations. RaY gives them out daily.
We know menstrual products are already expensive depending on income and method, sometimes prohibitively so. And if you are a Canadian who menstruates, you are also taxed on the products that allow you to function in regular society during Shark Week. In Manitoba, menstrual products are exempt from PST, but all Canadians who get periods pay five per cent GST on tampons, pads, panty liners and menstrual cups.
Menstrual products are not "luxuries." They are essential items that should not be subject to GST. Like groceries. Or, according to our government, wedding cakes. Most medical products, including incontinence products, are exempt. Menstrual products, strangely enough, don't count as medical products.
A Toronto group called No Tax on Tampons has taken up the cause of getting the GST removed from all menstrual products. It is gathering signatures via an online petition in support of Bill C-282, a private member's bill that, if passed, would see menstrual products be recognized as essential items and therefore exempt from the GST. The petition has almost 50,000 signatures. Bill C-282 was introduced by MP Irene Mathyssen in 2011 and again in 2013; before that, former MP Judy Wasylycia-Leis introduced a similar bill in 2004, calling the GST "gender-based taxation." That was more than 10 years ago and we're still having this conversation.
Data compiled by No Tax on Tampons found the Canadian government has made a lot of money off our uteri, collecting approximately $36,398,387 in government sales taxes from menstruating Canadians in 2014.
Of course, every time the idea of tax-free -- or, heaven forbid, completely subsidized -- menstrual products is brought up in the media, it's always greeted by a relatively small but vocal group of whiners whose cries of "it's not fair!" echo through comment sections. I'm reminded of that scene in Pretty in Pink in which Duckie exclaims: "What's this? We don't have a candy machine in the boy's room!" One commenter wrote the government shouldn't pander to this particular "special-interest group." While the Cherry Slush Club does sound very exclusive, half the population is a member.
You know what's really unfair? Being taxed because of one's biology. Not having access to basic necessities. That's unfair. It's insulting our government views tampons and pads as "non-essential" or "luxuries." No. A massage at a spa is a luxury. There's nothing particularly luxurious about a pad or a tampon, even the ones that are supposedly made from pearls and unicorn eyelashes. If they can't be free, they should at least be free of the GST.
And if you can afford to, buy an extra box next time you're out to help out a fellow red riding hood.
Jen Zoratti is a Winnipeg Free Press columnist and co-host of the paper's local culture podcast, Bury the Lede.
Your support has enabled us to provide free access to stories about COVID-19 because we believe everyone deserves trusted and critical information during the pandemic.
Our readership has contributed additional funding to give Free Press online subscriptions to those that can’t afford one in these extraordinary times — giving new readers the opportunity to see beyond the headlines and connect with other stories about their community.
To those who have made donations, thank you.
To those able to give and share our journalism with others, please Pay it Forward.
The Free Press has shared COVID-19 stories free of charge because we believe everyone deserves access to trusted and critical information during the pandemic.
While we stand by this decision, it has undoubtedly affected our bottom line.
After nearly 150 years of reporting on our city, we don’t want to stop any time soon. With your support, we’ll be able to forge ahead with our journalistic mission.
If you believe in an independent, transparent, and democratic press, please consider subscribing today.
We understand that some readers cannot afford a subscription during these difficult times and invite them to apply for a free digital subscription through our Pay it Forward program.
Updated on Monday, February 23, 2015 at 6:44 AM CST: Replaces photo, fixes pull quote