July 6, 2020

Winnipeg
25° C, A few clouds

Full Forecast

Advertisement

Advertise With Us

Opinion

New dollars, sure, but same political game

THE CANADIAN PRESS/Sean Kilpatrick</p><p>Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and Finance Minister Bill Morneau speak as they walk to the House of Commons to present the new budget in Ottawa, Tuesday.</p>

THE CANADIAN PRESS/Sean Kilpatrick

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and Finance Minister Bill Morneau speak as they walk to the House of Commons to present the new budget in Ottawa, Tuesday.

Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 19/3/2019 (474 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.

In November 2005, in the waning days of a Paul Martin-led Liberal federal government, the Kelowna Accord was forged.

It was the result of an unprecedented 18-month consultative process between the federal government, provincial and territorial governments and all five major national Indigenous organizations.

The result was a $5-billion commitment over five years, aimed at addressing massive inequities in Indigenous health, education, housing and infrastructure, economic opportunities, governance and the relationship between the federal government and Indigenous nations. Just to close the gap between Indigenous Peoples and Canadians.

Four days after forging this landmark agreement, Parliament was dissolved, with Martin eventually losing the next election to Stephen Harper and the Conservatives.

Harper’s first order of business: scrap the Kelowna Accord.

Critics have pointed out faults in the accord — no provisions to address child welfare, for example — but it was an egregious answer to the egregious situation of overwhelming poverty, unsafe living conditions and porous infrastructure in Indigenous communities.

Zoom ahead to the federal budget of 2019, which offers $4.5 billion in "new" money for Indigenous health, education and dealing with emergency situations such as tainted water.

Again, this is just to bring Indigenous Peoples to the same standard of living all Canadians enjoy.

Not beyond, just the same. It’s 2005 all over again.

Imagine for a moment how much cheaper it would be if Indigenous Peoples weren’t a passing political whim for whichever government is in office.

This year’s budgetary commitments, according to the Liberals, will bring federal government spending on "Indigenous affairs" to $17 billion by 2021-22.

Of that, around half goes to administer Indigenous Peoples via two departments (Crown-Indigenous Relations and Indigenous Services) and pay the salaries of nearly 5,000 employees. Again, 50 cents of every dollar for Indigenous affairs goes to bureaucrats, consultants and contractors — not Indigenous Peoples themselves.

So, what we’re really talking about is close to the budget for New Brunswick ($9 billion-plus). There are five times more Indigenous Peoples in Canada than the population of New Brunswick, but I digress.

There are several crucial elements in this year’s budget that will make real-life differences.

The biggest swath of funding ($1.3 billion over three years) is allocated to serve Jordan’s Principle, a program that ensures First Nations children receive services such as speech therapy, medical supports and equipment and mental-health services.

There are other important investments, such as more than $800 million to First Nations, Métis and Inuit education, and $700 million to support education initiatives in northern communities.

There is also $333.7 million over five years to support the proposed Indigenous Languages Act. (However, this must fund a new commissioner and office, so much of this money may go to bureaucracy.)

There are smaller, important commitments worth mentioning, such as $30 million to recognize the contribution of Métis veterans of the Second World War; $33.8 million to develop an online registry of residential school cemeteries so gravesites are respected; and $60 million over five years for urban Aboriginal programs, including money for Friendship Centres and community programs.

All of these will have an effect in Manitoba — and virtually all would cost much less if Canada had previously committed to its responsibilities to Indigenous Peoples.

The word reconciliation appears an unprecedented 85 times in the 2019 budget.

Also unprecedented: Tory Leader Andrew Scheer and his party members decried the Liberals for not allowing MP Jody Wilson-Raybould further testimony on the SNC-Lavalin affair.

The Conservatives demanded Wilson-Raybould, the former justice minister, be allowed to speak publicly — even drowning out Finance Minister Bill Morneau while he was trying to announce the budget.

Conservative MPs screamed out "Let her speak her truth!" and "We want to hear Jody!" as they slammed their desks.

Let me say that again: the Conservative Party of Canada — the same one that cancelled the Kelowna Accord on a whim — tried to stop the proceedings of Canadian government to hear from an Indigenous person.

That’s totally unprecedented.

Unfortunately, what’s the same is how Indigenous Peoples get used as pawns by political parties.

That much hasn’t changed.

niigaan.sinclair@freepress.mb.ca

Niigaan Sinclair

Niigaan Sinclair
Columnist

Niigaan Sinclair is Anishinaabe and is a columnist at the Winnipeg Free Press.

Read full biography

Advertisement

Advertise With Us

Your support has enabled us to provide free access to stories about COVID-19 because we believe everyone deserves trusted and critical information during the pandemic.

Our readership has contributed additional funding to give Free Press online subscriptions to those that can’t afford one in these extraordinary times — giving new readers the opportunity to see beyond the headlines and connect with other stories about their community.

To those who have made donations, thank you.

To those able to give and share our journalism with others, please Pay it Forward.

The Free Press has shared COVID-19 stories free of charge because we believe everyone deserves access to trusted and critical information during the pandemic.

While we stand by this decision, it has undoubtedly affected our bottom line.

After nearly 150 years of reporting on our city, we don’t want to stop any time soon. With your support, we’ll be able to forge ahead with our journalistic mission.

If you believe in an independent, transparent, and democratic press, please consider subscribing today.

We understand that some readers cannot afford a subscription during these difficult times and invite them to apply for a free digital subscription through our Pay it Forward program.

The Free Press will close this commenting platform at noon on July 14.

We want to thank those who have shared their views over the years as part of this reader engagement initiative.

In the coming weeks, the Free Press will announce new opportunities for readers to share their thoughts and to engage with our staff and each other.

You can comment on most stories on The Winnipeg Free Press website. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or digital subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

Have Your Say

Have Your Say

Comments are open to The Winnipeg Free Press print or digital subscribers only. why?

Have Your Say

Comments are open to The Winnipeg Free Press Subscribers only. why?

By submitting your comment, you agree to abide by our Community Standards and Moderation Policy. These guidelines were revised effective February 27, 2019. Have a question about our comment forum? Check our frequently asked questions.

Advertisement

Advertise With Us