August 20, 2017


25° C, A few clouds

Full Forecast


Advertise With Us

Melnick's deceit

Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 13/12/2013 (1345 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.

Opposition leader Brian Pallister is correct in saying an investigation is needed into the conduct of NDP MLA Christine Melnick, who misled and lied to the House in response to questions about whether a senior civil servant had acted in a politically partisan manner.

On May 30, 2012, Ms. Melnick, then the minister of immigration, was grilled repeatedly by Tory Mavis Taillieu as to whether her assistant deputy minister, Ben Rempel, acted alone or under someone else's direction when he sent an email inviting 500 immigration workers to the legislature to hear debate on an NDP resolution.

"We don't know -- there was no direction to send this email," Melnick responded, according to Hansard.

Taillieu responded: "So, by admitting that, then, the minister is saying that the ADM (Rempel) actually did this on his own initiative.

"And the reasons I'm asking these questions is, I'm looking at the organizational chart... and I'm quite curious to know if staff are being asked to do the political work of the minister, for her own political party, rather than being independent civil servants?"

The minister dodged the question, as she did repeatedly that day and on at least two other days when the issue was raised in the legislature, unconcerned about the perception that either Mr. Rempel was a partisan civil servant, or that the NDP had politicized the civil service.

The minister had already told the media she did not direct Mr. Rempel to send the email, which the Ombudsman's office has now determined was a falsehood. Giving false evidence to the house is a violation of the Legislative Assembly Act.

The legislation empowers the assembly to punish offences "as breaches of privilege or as contempt of court."

Finally, Ms. Melnick apologized late Friday. It was the right thing to do, but she waited far too long.


Advertise With Us

Editorials are the consensus view of the Winnipeg Free Press' editorial board.

Editorials are the consensus view of the Winnipeg Free Press' editorial board.

You can comment on most stories on You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

Have Your Say

New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscribers only. why?

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press Subscribers only. why?

The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective January 2015.

Photo Store

Scroll down to load more