July 14, 2020

13° C, Partly cloudy

Full Forecast

Close this
Winnipeg Free Press



Official position on masks takes turn


If there’s a single topic that best encapsulates the confusion, anxiety and shifting streams of "reliable" information associated with the COVID-19 pandemic, it would be the issue of protective face masks.

Wear them? Don’t wear them? No help? Some help? Such a big help they should be considered essential?

The answers depend on who provides the information and on which day they offer it.

Since the outset of the COVID-19 crisis, the perspective of Manitoba’s health-care leaders has been that there is little benefit to be gained by individual citizens wearing face coverings — surgical respirators, painter’s masks or even just scarfs or handkerchiefs — while out in public. As recently as Wednesday, chief public health officer Dr. Brent Roussin said face masks aren’t advised for the public because the virus is spread by direct, prolonged face-to-face exposure.

(If that’s the case, one can’t help wondering why so much emphasis has been placed on frequently washing our hands and constantly disinfecting such surfaces as countertops, doorknobs and shopping cart handles.)

Ronald Zak / The Associated Press files</p><p>Shoppers wear protective masks in Vienna.</p>

Ronald Zak / The Associated Press files

Shoppers wear protective masks in Vienna.

The message has been consistent, in Manitoba and in the majority of jurisdictions beyond our borders. In recent days, however, what amounts to "best practice" for people going out in public has undergone a shift. On Friday, U.S. President Donald Trump urged Americans to follow new advice from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention by wearing scarves or masks whenever they go out in public.

The rationale for the CDC abandoning its directive that "You do not need to wear a face mask unless you are caring for someone who is sick (and they are not able to wear a face mask)" seems to be new data indicating high rates of transmission involving people who are asymptomatic (not showing any signs of illness) but test positive for COVID-19.

The message has been consistent, in Manitoba and in the majority of jurisdictions beyond our borders. In recent days, however, what amounts to “best practice” for people going out in public has undergone a shift.

The mayors of New York and Los Angeles did not wait for a new CDC directive before advising their citizens to wear face coverings — preferably homemade, so as not to deny a much-needed mask to a health-care worker — whenever they leave home. One can’t help wondering how quickly Canada’s coronavirus response — and, inevitably, Manitoba’s — will be amended to follow the CDC’s lead.

On the surface, the idea of medical professionals advising the public not to wear face protection in public seems counterintuitive — even if such a measure provided only a small measure of protection, it would fall into the same folk-wisdom category that touts chicken soup as a relief from the common cold: there’s no evidence that it helps, but it couldn’t hurt.

There’s a school of thought that suggests officials’ discouraging public use of face masks was an early attempt to minimize panic-buying that would keep viral barriers out of the hands of health workers and front-line workers, and that it’s only now that community transmission of COVID-19 is accelerating that officials feel compelled to sound the alarm.

Whether that argument is based on sound reasoning or just another pandemic-panic conspiracy theory, the fact is that the official position on public use of face masks is changing. It’s yet another unsettling development in a crisis whose definitions, limits and cautions seem to change with every new confirmed case.

Editorials are the consensus view of the Winnipeg Free Press’ editorial board.

Your support has enabled us to provide free access to stories about COVID-19 because we believe everyone deserves trusted and critical information during the pandemic.

Our readership has contributed additional funding to give Free Press online subscriptions to those that can’t afford one in these extraordinary times — giving new readers the opportunity to see beyond the headlines and connect with other stories about their community.

To those who have made donations, thank you.

To those able to give and share our journalism with others, please Pay it Forward.

The Free Press has shared COVID-19 stories free of charge because we believe everyone deserves access to trusted and critical information during the pandemic.

While we stand by this decision, it has undoubtedly affected our bottom line.

After nearly 150 years of reporting on our city, we don’t want to stop any time soon. With your support, we’ll be able to forge ahead with our journalistic mission.

If you believe in an independent, transparent, and democratic press, please consider subscribing today.

We understand that some readers cannot afford a subscription during these difficult times and invite them to apply for a free digital subscription through our Pay it Forward program.

The Free Press will close this commenting platform at noon on July 14.

We want to thank those who have shared their views over the years as part of this reader engagement initiative.

In the coming weeks, the Free Press will announce new opportunities for readers to share their thoughts and to engage with our staff and each other.

You can comment on most stories on The Winnipeg Free Press website. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or digital subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

Have Your Say

Have Your Say

Comments are open to The Winnipeg Free Press print or digital subscribers only. why?

Have Your Say

Comments are open to The Winnipeg Free Press Subscribers only. why?

By submitting your comment, you agree to abide by our Community Standards and Moderation Policy. These guidelines were revised effective February 27, 2019. Have a question about our comment forum? Check our frequently asked questions.