June 6, 2020

Winnipeg
8° C, Clear

Full Forecast

Winnipeg Free Press

ABOVE THE FOLD

Help us deliver reliable news during this pandemic.

We are working tirelessly to bring you trusted information about COVID-19. Support our efforts by subscribing today.

No Thanks Subscribe

Already a subscriber?

Protecting Quebec votes is business as usual

Editorial

Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 13/5/2019 (389 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.

In Ottawa this week, the opposition parties are eager to establish that the messy unravelling of the breach-of-trust case involving Vice-Admiral Mark Norman is just another example of business as usual for the Trudeau government.

Conservatives and New Democrats will argue that, just as was the case with the SNC-Lavalin affair, the sudden decision to stay the charges against Mr. Norman is a result of misconduct by Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and other senior government officials.

Ultimately, they might have a point. But in pursuing this opportunity to condemn the current federal government for its overreach into judicial matters that are supposed to be free from political interference, the opposition parties might also end up reminding Canadians that business as usual in Ottawa is business as usual regardless of which party is in power.

Four Conservative MPs and one NDP member last week signed a letter to the clerk of the House of Commons national defence committee, requesting an emergency meeting of the committee and a formal review of the investigation and prosecution of Mr. Norman, a highly respected naval officer whose reputation was tarnished by the case that was abruptly abandoned last week.

Vice Admiral Mark Norman was accused of leaking classified government information regarding a contract with Quebec-based Davie Shipbuilding.

SEAN KILPATRICK / THE CANADIAN PRESS FILES

Vice Admiral Mark Norman was accused of leaking classified government information regarding a contract with Quebec-based Davie Shipbuilding.

At issue in the case was an allegation that Mr. Norman, then second in command in Canada’s military, had unlawfully leaked classified government information in the hope of influencing a cabinet decision regarding a $668-million contract with Quebec-based Davie Shipbuilding for converting a civilian container ship into a navy supply vessel.

The letter to the defence committee states that Mr. Trudeau influenced the case in 2018 by indicating he thought the RCMP’s investigation would lead to a conviction, which suggests he had access to inside information. The MPs’ complaint also refers to the federal government’s efforts to stymie Mr. Norman’s lawyers by blocking access to documents necessary for his defence.

The request for a review of the case includes a list of individuals who should be called to testify, including Mr. Norman, Mr. Trudeau, several cabinet ministers, the PM’s chief of staff, former Privy Council clerk Michael Wernick and the PM’s former chief secretary, Gerald Butts.

Conservative Leader Andrew Scheer said it’s necessary to have those associated with the Norman case answer questions in order to ascertain "what went so wrong here."

Mr. Scheer’s interest in getting to the bottom of things presumably extends only as far as the Trudeau government’s involvement, but the shipbuilding contract at the centre of the case dates back to the former Conservative government of Stephen Harper, which in 2015 changed rules of procurement to allow Davie to secure the contract without a formal bid process.

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and Leader of the Opposition Andrew Scheer know winning in Quebec is one of the keys to winning a federal election.

ADRIAN WYLD / THE CANADIAN PRESS FILES

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and Leader of the Opposition Andrew Scheer know winning in Quebec is one of the keys to winning a federal election.

And the reason for the change was to protect a Quebec business at a time when crucial Quebec votes were going to largely determine the outcome of a federal election. Mr. Harper’s government was defeated anyway, before the Davie deal was completed, and Mr. Trudeau’s Liberals quickly signed the contract after taking office.

In the Norman case and the SNC-Lavalin affair alike, government meddling sought to deliver a desired result to a Quebec enterprise out of fear that failing to do so would bring a stern rebuke from voters in that province. Opposition MPs will point to this as a failing of the Liberal government, but history suggests the Conservatives would likely have done exactly the same things if faced with the same challenges.

The NDP’s higher-ground claim is based on never having formed government and therefore never having faced the prospect of losing Quebec.

Business as usual, indeed.

Editorials are the consensus view of the Winnipeg Free Press’ editorial board.

Your support has enabled us to provide free access to stories about COVID-19 because we believe everyone deserves trusted and critical information during the pandemic.

Our readership has contributed additional funding to give Free Press online subscriptions to those that can’t afford one in these extraordinary times — giving new readers the opportunity to see beyond the headlines and connect with other stories about their community.

To those who have made donations, thank you.

To those able to give and share our journalism with others, please Pay it Forward.

The Free Press has shared COVID-19 stories free of charge because we believe everyone deserves access to trusted and critical information during the pandemic.

While we stand by this decision, it has undoubtedly affected our bottom line.

After nearly 150 years of reporting on our city, we don’t want to stop any time soon. With your support, we’ll be able to forge ahead with our journalistic mission.

If you believe in an independent, transparent, and democratic press, please consider subscribing today.

We understand that some readers cannot afford a subscription during these difficult times and invite them to apply for a free digital subscription through our Pay it Forward program.

The Free Press would like to thank our readers for their patience while comments were not available on our site. We're continuing to work with our commenting software provider on issues with the platform. In the meantime, if you're not able to see comments after logging in to our site, please try refreshing the page.

You can comment on most stories on The Winnipeg Free Press website. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or digital subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

Have Your Say

Have Your Say

Comments are open to The Winnipeg Free Press print or digital subscribers only. why?

Have Your Say

Comments are open to The Winnipeg Free Press Subscribers only. why?

By submitting your comment, you agree to abide by our Community Standards and Moderation Policy. These guidelines were revised effective February 27, 2019. Have a question about our comment forum? Check our frequently asked questions.