Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 22/3/2019 (472 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.
Google "should Canadian universities ban student-professor relationships?" and you’ll get over 17 million results, most of them headlines. It’s a question that gets asked — and considered, pondered, mulled and debated — every time a professor is accused of sexual misconduct.
Overwhelmingly, however, Canadian universities have decided that the answer to that question is no. And the University of Manitoba is one of them.
The U of M introduced last week a pair of policies about how employees should disclose intimate relationships between themselves and students. The three-page "Relationships Between University Employees and Students" document states intimate relationships must be disclosed, and romantic or sexual relationships where there is a power differential — i.e. staff and student — are "strongly discouraged and should be avoided." But it stops short of banning student-employee relationships all together.
The U of M also launched an online course this week about sexual-violence awareness. The course is not mandatory.
The policies come in the wake of multiple investigations into inappropriate faculty behaviour, conducted both internally and by police, that have rocked the post-secondary institution. In December 2018, the University of Manitoba Students Union called for restrictions on student-prof relationships after former U of M music professor Steve Kirby was charged with sexual assault.
Harvard, Stanford and Yale all prohibit relationships between faculty and undergraduate students.
"Strongly discouraged and should be avoided" isn’t really a restriction, especially when the policies do not say what the repercussions would be for anyone found breaching them. So, who do these policies really protect? It doesn’t seem like it’s the students.
There is precedent for a university-wide ban: Harvard, Stanford and Yale all prohibit relationships between faculty and undergraduate students.
U of M is far from the only university wary about an outright ban. Some argue a ban would impinge on the rights and privacy of university employees. Others argue that a ban infantilizes consenting adult students. There’s almost always talk of legal and ethical "grey areas," and concern that a ban steps over the line.
But grey areas can lead to loopholes, especially where predation and coercion are concerned. It’s worth remembering that students, especially at the undergrad level, are young and impressionable; in fact, they are paying good money to be impressed upon. Schools that allow professors to pursue relationships with students — or, at least, look the other way when they do — make students vulnerable to professors who abuse and exploit those power imbalances. Mandatory disclosures can help institutions manage ostensibly consensual relationships and conflicts of interest, but what happens if those relationships change or are not, in fact, all that consensual in the first place?
The power a professor has isn’t limited to the lecture hall. Professors also write recommendations and sit on boards and committees that let them exert influence in and outside of academia. An environment where students believe they need to sleep with a prof to be successful is not a safe one.
But perhaps we’re asking the wrong question when it comes to considering a ban on student-professor relationships. Maybe what we should be asking is, what is the benefit to allowing professor-student relationships? With reputations, careers and, in some cases, the safety of the student body on the line, it seems there’s very little.
Editorials are the consensus view of the Winnipeg Free Press’ editorial board.
Your support has enabled us to provide free access to stories about COVID-19 because we believe everyone deserves trusted and critical information during the pandemic.
Our readership has contributed additional funding to give Free Press online subscriptions to those that can’t afford one in these extraordinary times — giving new readers the opportunity to see beyond the headlines and connect with other stories about their community.
To those who have made donations, thank you.
To those able to give and share our journalism with others, please Pay it Forward.
The Free Press has shared COVID-19 stories free of charge because we believe everyone deserves access to trusted and critical information during the pandemic.
While we stand by this decision, it has undoubtedly affected our bottom line.
After nearly 150 years of reporting on our city, we don’t want to stop any time soon. With your support, we’ll be able to forge ahead with our journalistic mission.
If you believe in an independent, transparent, and democratic press, please consider subscribing today.
We understand that some readers cannot afford a subscription during these difficult times and invite them to apply for a free digital subscription through our Pay it Forward program.