January 22, 2020

-10° C, Clear

Full Forecast

Report lays bare Hydro's bad days


Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 24/8/2018 (515 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.

If Manitoba Hydro is the poster child for resource extraction on Indigenous land, the poster was smeared with ugly allegations this week.

Disturbing reports show the Crown corporation has known since 2012 and didn’t adequately address decades-old allegations of abuse in Fox Lake Cree Nation by Hydro workers.

The accusations are even more disheartening because they echo an ugly narrative of power imbalance, racism and exploitation that Manitoba has experienced all too often.

A report that surfaced Tuesday includes testimonies Fox Lake residents gave to the Clean Environment Commission, an arms-length agency of the Manitoba government. The commission had asked for input on the effect of Hydro development on the North, and it got an earful.

Fox Lake residents recounted racism, violence and sexual assault that occurred near Gillam after large-scale Hydro projects began in the 1960s.

They described a scenario in which hundreds of construction workers overwhelmed the local community, creating a toxic environment of social tension and violence that included sexual assaults on local women. They say the outsiders acted like predators.

As described by Franklin Arthurson, a Cree-born employee of Hydro in the 1960s, "Construction workers, they’re a hardy lot, they drink hard, they live hard. And they all chase women."

Why didn’t the RCMP keep order? Residents said police were part of the problem.

A shocking, although unsubstantiated, allegation is that Mounties "organized gangbangs" in nearby Gillam. "They would pick up Fox Lake women, take them to jail, and bring all of the Hydro guys there to do what they wanted with these young women."

It would be reassuring to think such troubling accusations would get high-alert attention when they reached responsible authority figures, but Hydro and the CEC have known about the allegations since at least 2012.

When the matter exploded into big-headline media prominence this week, there were many calls to further investigate. The Assembly of Manitoba Chiefs wants an independent investigation. Opposition parties want to know why Sustainability Development Minister Rochelle Squires sat on the report for two months before releasing it.

The Mounties may call in the Independent Investigation Unit of Manitoba so police aren’t investigating themselves. Indigenous Relations Minister Eileen Clark said she will visit northern communities, including Fox Lake, although Fox Lake said she hasn’t been invited.

While further investigation is certainly required, the results are unlikely to lead to the mass convictions. The events happened as early as the 1960s, and even on crimes without a statute of limitations, law courts are reluctant to accept memories from 60 years ago without substantial corroboration and written records, which are unlikely to exist in most of these cases.

A more realistic expectation is that powerful bodies such as Hydro will examine the atrocities at Fox Lake as lessons to underline the importance of cultural sensitivity.

Fox Lake is a reminder that the bad old days are deplorable and unacceptable.

To be fair to Hydro, the corporation’s relations with Indigenous people have improved dramatically from the 1960s to 2018. Hydro now offers a two-day Indigenous cultural awareness workshop for all employees, which is mandatory for all supervisors and managers in northern Manitoba, and almost 50 per cent of Hydro’s northern staff now identify as Indigenous. Counsellors are on-site at Keeyask to assist any Hydro or contractor employee.

Fox Lake is a reminder that the bad old days are deplorable and unacceptable.

Indigenous people should be treated with respect because their partnership is essential for Hydro projects, and also for industries such as mining, forestry and tourism.

But, more importantly, they warrant respect simply because everyone does.

Editorials are the consensus view of the Winnipeg Free Press’ editorial board.

You can comment on most stories on The Winnipeg Free Press website. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or digital subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

Have Your Say

Have Your Say

Comments are open to The Winnipeg Free Press print or digital subscribers only. why?

Have Your Say

Comments are open to The Winnipeg Free Press Subscribers only. why?

By submitting your comment, you agree to abide by our Community Standards and Moderation Policy. These guidelines were revised effective February 27, 2019. Have a question about our comment forum? Check our frequently asked questions.