September 25, 2017

Winnipeg
12° C, Overcast

Full Forecast

Advertisement

Advertise With Us

Letter of the day: Blaming the victim

Re: Rape victim 'inviting,' so no jail (Feb. 24). I am more than a little disheartened that Queen's Bench Justice Robert Dewar handed down such a sentence for the convicted Kenneth Rhodes. Justice Dewar blamed the victim, pure and simple.

What a woman wears, be it a tube top and makeup or nothing at all, has no bearing whatsoever on her ability to give informed and continuous consent. To state that the convicted was simply "insensitive to the fact that she was an unwilling participant" is irresponsible and in no way fitting or appropriate of a judicial official.

I am disgusted and disturbed by this ruling. Because of a judge's preconceived notions that a woman "wanted to party," he has put other women at risk of this offender. Rape is a crime of power, not one of desire. To undermine the victim based on what she wears and her "unintentional invitation" is not acceptable. He has taken us back to the 1950s.

Subscribers Log in below to continue reading,
not a subscriber? Create an account to start a 30 day free trial.

Log in Create your account

Add a payment method

To read the remaining 5 words of this article.

Pay only 27¢ for articles you wish to read.

Hope you enjoyed your trial.

Add a payment method

To read the remaining 5 words of this article.

Pay only 27¢ for articles you wish to read.

Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 24/2/2011 (2404 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.

Re: Rape victim 'inviting,' so no jail (Feb. 24). I am more than a little disheartened that Queen's Bench Justice Robert Dewar handed down such a sentence for the convicted Kenneth Rhodes. Justice Dewar blamed the victim, pure and simple.

What a woman wears, be it a tube top and makeup or nothing at all, has no bearing whatsoever on her ability to give informed and continuous consent. To state that the convicted was simply "insensitive to the fact that she was an unwilling participant" is irresponsible and in no way fitting or appropriate of a judicial official.

I am disgusted and disturbed by this ruling. Because of a judge's preconceived notions that a woman "wanted to party," he has put other women at risk of this offender. Rape is a crime of power, not one of desire. To undermine the victim based on what she wears and her "unintentional invitation" is not acceptable. He has taken us back to the 1950s.

 

HAYLEY BRIAND

Winnipeg

Advertisement

Advertise With Us

You can comment on most stories on The Winnipeg Free Press website. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

Have Your Say

New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.

Have Your Say

Comments are open to The Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscribers only. why?

Have Your Say

Comments are open to The Winnipeg Free Press Subscribers only. why?

The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective January 2015.