All Sections

June 6, 2020

5° C, Clear

Full Forecast

Help us deliver reliable news during this pandemic.

We are working tirelessly to bring you trusted information about COVID-19. Support our efforts by subscribing today.

No Thanks Subscribe

Already a subscriber?


Advertise With Us

Committee turns down Parker Lands proposal

Parker Lands developer Andrew Marquess of Gem Equities speaks at a City Centre community committee meeting at city hall on Nov. 13.


Parker Lands developer Andrew Marquess of Gem Equities speaks at a City Centre community committee meeting at city hall on Nov. 13.

Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 19/11/2018 (564 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.

A redevelopment project proposed for the Parker Lands failed to receive support from the City Centre community committee last week.

Developer Gem Equities is proposing to create a mixed-use residential development along the second phase of the southwest transit corridor. When complete, the Fulton Grove project would include approximately 1,900 residential units.

On Nov. 13, the committee rejected the secondary plan proposed for the site, in accordance with an administrative recommendation.

The purpose of the secondary plan is to provide detailed policies to direct development within a specific area. The administrative report notes that the plan does not provide sufficient detail and that it’s missing important content.

At the same meeting, the committee also denied an application to subdivide and rezone the land located northeast of Hurst Way between Asquith Avenue and the CN rail line.

Coun. John Orlikow (River Heights-Fort Garry) shared his thoughts during the meeting, which ran more than six hours.

"We are close. I do believe we are close. There are some points raised by the applicant’s team and by the administration team, so I see the light," he said. "We’re getting there, but I don’t believe we’re there yet."

He highlighted some concerns about the project, including potential problems with collaboration among the parties.

"The subdivision rezoning is almost there but it’s not there yet. I think the parties can get together and make this happen. I support this happening; however, there are some significant issues that I’ve heard from both sides that need to be clarified before I can properly make a decision," he said. "So until those clarifications are made, I’ll be voting to reject the application."

Andrew Marquess, owner of Gem Equities, recently won a court battle to require that the proposed secondary plan be considered at the Nov. 13 city centre community committee meeting. He later expressed his displeasure with the outcome.

"I was disappointed with the decision that was made there to outright reject the application. Given all the investment that’s been made in the area, it really positions the area to have growth. And you have a vacant piece of land there that isn’t being readied for development, so that’s probably the biggest issue for everyone involved," Marquess said.

The issue will be forwarded to standing policy committee on property and development, heritage and downtown development.


Advertise With Us

Your support has enabled us to provide free access to stories about COVID-19 because we believe everyone deserves trusted and critical information during the pandemic.

Our readership has contributed additional funding to give Free Press online subscriptions to those that can’t afford one in these extraordinary times — giving new readers the opportunity to see beyond the headlines and connect with other stories about their community.

To those who have made donations, thank you.

To those able to give and share our journalism with others, please Pay it Forward.

The Free Press has shared COVID-19 stories free of charge because we believe everyone deserves access to trusted and critical information during the pandemic.

While we stand by this decision, it has undoubtedly affected our bottom line.

After nearly 150 years of reporting on our city, we don’t want to stop any time soon. With your support, we’ll be able to forge ahead with our journalistic mission.

If you believe in an independent, transparent, and democratic press, please consider subscribing today.

We understand that some readers cannot afford a subscription during these difficult times and invite them to apply for a free digital subscription through our Pay it Forward program.

The Free Press would like to thank our readers for their patience while comments were not available on our site. We're continuing to work with our commenting software provider on issues with the platform. In the meantime, if you're not able to see comments after logging in to our site, please try refreshing the page.

You can comment on most stories on The Winnipeg Free Press website. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or digital subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

Have Your Say

Have Your Say

Comments are open to The Winnipeg Free Press print or digital subscribers only. why?

Have Your Say

Comments are open to The Winnipeg Free Press Subscribers only. why?

By submitting your comment, you agree to abide by our Community Standards and Moderation Policy. These guidelines were revised effective February 27, 2019. Have a question about our comment forum? Check our frequently asked questions.


Advertise With Us