August 17, 2017


22° C, A few clouds

Full Forecast


Advertise With Us

Steeves changes his mind on bus rapid transit and wants to kill the project

He supported BRT when he was a councillor

Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 23/8/2014 (1090 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.

Gord Steeves says it’s time to get off the bus.

He supported the bus rapid transit (BRT) project when he was a councillor and he supported completion of Phase 2 of the project in May when council was mired in a debate over the plan’s future.

Mayoral hopeful Gord Steeves supported bus rapid transit when he was a councillor. Now, he says it is too expensive.


Mayoral hopeful Gord Steeves supported bus rapid transit when he was a councillor. Now, he says it is too expensive.

But Steeves has reversed his decision and said it’s time to kill the project.

Speaking Friday from a spot near Parker Avenue in northwest Fort Garry — where the corridor is planned to go — Steeves said if elected mayor, he would introduce a motion to kill the $600-million project at the first council meeting after the Oct. 22 election.

Steeves said the project proposed now is different and more expensive than when he was a councillor. While he supported it three months ago, he said after further analysis, "the BRT plan does not hold up, and I can no longer support it."

Steeves said city council has not made any provision for the $20 million needed annually for 30 years to pay for its share of the project, adding he’s concerned that will mean a four to five per cent property-tax increase.

"I believe this project will do more harm than good," Steeves said, adding the controversial dogleg route alongside the Parker lands will hurt development on Pembina Highway between Bishop Grandin Boulevard and Jubilee Avenue.

His reversal caught other mayoral hopefuls by surprise, all of them describing it as a political ploy.

Brian Bowman said Steeves’ reversal is typical of the style of politics that has dominated city hall.

"It’s important for our elected officials to stand on principle and not just polling," Bowman, who supports completion of BRT, said. "I’m not sure what’s changed from a few weeks ago when former councillor Steeves indicated full support for rapid transit as well as the route, but what we’re seeing now is a pretty big flip-flop in the middle of a campaign."

Steeves said the current plan is a major change from what he supported while a councillor, when the route was entirely along Pembina Highway.

"We’re essentially running a rapid-transit line through an empty field... with virtually no chance of good development," he said, referring to the route that briefly veers west from Pembina Highway.

"Building this phase of BRT would be a monumental mistake for our city that would be one that we would regret for decades to come."

Steeves said the $600-million price tag and increased debt and borrowing costs can’t be justified by the vague promises of a few minutes savings in commute time every morning.

Steeves said it’s not necessary to hold a referendum on the project, as proposed by Coun. Jeff Browaty, adding the election is the referendum and voters should cast their ballots based on candidates’ position on the transit corridor.

Steeves said he wouldn’t support BRT even with a new route without the Parker dogleg, adding the money could be better spent on more urgently needed infrastructure projects.

Read more by Aldo Santin.


Advertise With Us

When Steeves supported rapid transit:


Updated on Saturday, August 23, 2014 at 9:23 AM CDT: Adds video

August 25, 2014 at 2:13 PM: The route briefly veers west from Pembina Highway.

You can comment on most stories on You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

Have Your Say

New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscribers only. why?

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press Subscribers only. why?

The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective January 2015.

Photo Store

Scroll down to load more