August 16, 2017


20° C, Partly cloudy

Full Forecast

Record: 40 – 35 – 7

Winnipeg Jets Logo

Winnipeg Jets (40 – 35 – 7)


Advertise With Us

One lousy point no good

Jet again forced to look for silver lining in loss; have trouble finding one

Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 24/10/2013 (1391 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.

NASHVILLE -- It's a tired refrain, spit out often by a Winnipeg Jets squad which has mastered the art of finding silver linings in defeat.

And the frustration of it all bubbled to the surface following Thursday night's 3-2 OT loss to the Nashville Predators at Bridgestone Arena.

Winnipeg goalie Ondrej Pavelec blocks a shot as Jets D-man Grant Clitsome steers Nashville forward Matt Cullen away from the rebound.


Winnipeg goalie Ondrej Pavelec blocks a shot as Jets D-man Grant Clitsome steers Nashville forward Matt Cullen away from the rebound.

"We got a point... that's a good thing. But I don't know what to say," said goaltender Ondrej Pavelec. "It's over and over. It's tough to say something.

"It's frustrating. We can feel sorry for ourselves. Positives? We lost the game in overtime and I don't take any positives. We need the points. That's all that matters. If we're going to tell ourselves, 'Oh we played good one period we can build on it'... no, we need two points."

The OT loss drops the Jets record to 4-5-2 in the start of an important early-season jaunt through the Central Division that continues Saturday in Dallas.



Claude Noel summed up his team's game succinctly after the loss, answering just a couple of questions in 2:57 of a post-game interview. And what he said in just under three minutes also offered a hint at his own frustration with his inconsistent team.

"I thought we started off the first 10 minutes and we were really solid, did a lot of good things... pretty much textbook," said Noel. "From there we weren't able to sustain some of the stuff we were doing... we played inconsistent.

"The big task for our team is to be consistent through 60 minutes. We continue to play in spurts. You see some really good things and you see some other things -- the first five minutes of the third period, we were nowhere. We couldn't get out clean, we couldn't get things going. It's like, 'Are you serious right now?' That makes it difficult. It really comes from puck management, support, different little details in our game.

"We did some good things in the game. We played a good road game. We battled physically, we got people to the net, we got traffic at the net.

"And then the last 10 minutes of the first period we wanted to play cute. We were making plays in front of the defence, we were getting stalled, we weren't getting it deep, we weren't getting pucks to the net again. It's like, 'What is this, Jekyll and Hyde?' "



The Jets rallied from a 2-1 deficit to tie the contest with 3:01 left when Blake Wheeler buried a Zach Bogosian rebound behind Carter Hutton for his second goal in as many games and third of the season.

But then in OT an Evander Kane clearing pass from his defensive zone bounced away from Dustin Byfuglien to Predators forward David Legwand, who then fed Craig Smith for winner with just 17 seconds left.

So... point gained, given the late Wheeler goal, or point lost?

"I would think point lost," said Noel. "We know they play this type of game. That's all fine. But for me it's a point lost. We expect to take steps. We didn't take a step backwards, OK. But we need to take another step. And when it is it going to come? We can't wait here forever. We're on to 11 games and there need to be some steps forward."

"It's a game we'd like to win," said Wheeler. "We had momentum going into overtime, but a bad bounce there and it ends up being the game winner. I think there's a lot more than that... there's some bouncing pucks...

"These division games you'd like to get two, but it didn't work out that way tonight." Twitter: @WFPEdTait

So much sports on TV last night: Jets; Bombers; and Cardinals vs Red Sox. What did you watch? Did you have to fight for the remote? Join the conversation in the comments below.


Advertise With Us


Updated on Friday, October 25, 2013 at 6:58 AM CDT: Replaces photo, adds question for discussion

You can comment on most stories on You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

Have Your Say

New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscribers only. why?

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press Subscribers only. why?

The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective January 2015.

Photo Store

Scroll down to load more