Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 25/6/2019 (373 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.
The sentencing of a former Lorette teacher convicted of sexually abusing a young girl was delayed but not derailed on Friday, as defence counsel tried to reopen the trial and admit fresh evidence that included an inmate’s handwritten confession.
Court of Queen’s Bench Justice Ken Champagne dismissed the attempt and will sentence Remi Dallaire tomorrow.
Crown prosecutor Danielle Simard argued for a prison sentence of eight years, while defence lawyer Matt Gould suggested five years.
Dallaire was found guilty of sexual interference, inviting sexual touching, and providing sexually explicit material to a child following a trial last September. A conviction for sexual assault was recorded but stayed under a legal principle intended to avoid sentencing redundancies.
The former Ecole Lagimodiere teacher didn’t testify at the trial but maintained he was an innocent man framed by a vengeful ex-partner.
Champagne concluded the facts of the case told a much different story: in June 2016, Dallaire, then 31 and living in Lorette, quickly befriended a single mother and her eight-year-old daughter who had moved into an apartment across the hall.
Within days he was spending unsupervised time alone with the girl that court heard included repeated and graphic instances of touching and sexual assault.
In a victim impact statement referenced in court, the girl wrote that Dallaire ruined her life. She requires weekly counselling and distrusts male authority figures, her mother wrote.
A pre-sentence report deemed Dallaire a medium risk to reoffend. Simard recommended he be banned from schools, community centres, and daycares for 20 years; prohibited from working with children under age 16; and added to the national sex offender registry for life.
Dallaire, wearing ankle shackles, declined an opportunity to address the court.
"I just can’t speak at this moment, sir," he told the judge.
Earlier in Friday’s hearing, Gould argued evidence that surfaced at Headingley Correctional Centre in January warranted reopening the trial.
A fellow inmate confessed in writing to Dallaire’s crimes, then retracted the statement three days later, saying Dallaire had offered him a financial reward.
Gould argued the evidence, while problematic, deserved to be tested at trial.
Simard disagreed, saying the inmate’s story was rife with hearsay and the product of obvious coaching.
"It would be laughable if it weren’t so offensive."
Champagne sided with the Crown, but gave himself five more days to consider the length of Dallaire’s prison term. He noted sentences for sexual offences against minors are escalating in courts across Canada.
Your support has enabled us to provide free access to stories about COVID-19 because we believe everyone deserves trusted and critical information during the pandemic.
Our readership has contributed additional funding to give Free Press online subscriptions to those that can’t afford one in these extraordinary times — giving new readers the opportunity to see beyond the headlines and connect with other stories about their community.
To those who have made donations, thank you.
To those able to give and share our journalism with others, please Pay it Forward.
The Free Press has shared COVID-19 stories free of charge because we believe everyone deserves access to trusted and critical information during the pandemic.
While we stand by this decision, it has undoubtedly affected our bottom line.
After nearly 150 years of reporting on our city, we don’t want to stop any time soon. With your support, we’ll be able to forge ahead with our journalistic mission.
If you believe in an independent, transparent, and democratic press, please consider subscribing today.
We understand that some readers cannot afford a subscription during these difficult times and invite them to apply for a free digital subscription through our Pay it Forward program.