Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 12/7/2014 (1135 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.
You may think you're better at reading than you are at math (or vice versa), but new research suggests you're probably equally good (or bad) at both.
The reason: The genes that determine a person's ability to tackle one subject influence their aptitude at the other, accounting for about half of a person's overall ability.
The study, published last week in the journal Nature Communications, used nearly 1,500 pairs of 12-year-old twins to tease apart the effects of genetic inheritance and environmental variables on math and reading ability. Twin studies provide a clever way of assessing the balance of nature and nurture.
"Twins are like a natural experiment," said Robert Plomin, a psychologist at King's College London who worked on the study. Identical twins share 100 per cent of their DNA and fraternal twins share 50 per cent (on average), but all siblings presumably experience similar degrees of parental attentiveness, economic opportunity and so on. Different pairs of twins, in contrast, grow up in unique environments.
The researchers administered a set of math and verbal tests to the children and then compared the performances of different sets of twins. They found the twins' scores -- no matter if they were high or low -- were twice as similar among pairs of identical twins as among pairs of fraternal twins. The results indicated approximately half the children's math and reading ability stemmed from their genetic makeup.
A complementary analysis of unrelated kids corroborated this conclusion -- strangers with equivalent academic abilities shared genetic similarities.
What's more, the genes responsible for math and reading ability appear to be numerous and interconnected, not specifically targeted toward one set of skills. These so-called "generalist genes" act in concert to determine a child's aptitude across multiple disciplines.
"If you found genes for reading," Plomin said, "you have over a 50 per cent chance that those same genes would influence math."
That's not to say specialized brain circuits don't exist for different tasks, said Timothy Bates, a psychologist at the University of Edinburgh who was not involved in the study.
"If those 'squiggles on a page' the young child encounters are math or prose, different brain systems, with different genes, are involved in learning to decode them," he said. The new study just illustrates these genes build on a more general foundation of learning ability, he said.
The finding one's propensities for math and reading go hand in hand may come as a surprise to many, but it shouldn't. People often feel they possess skills in only one area simply because they perform slightly worse in the other, Plomin said, but it's all relative.
"You might think you're a little less good at math, but compared to everybody in the world, you're pretty good at math," he said.
That's great news for those who came out on top of the genetic lottery, but what about everyone else?
"We don't want to pit nature vs. nurture," Plomin said. "But for parents who still think kids are a blob of clay that you mould to be what you want them to be, I hope this data -- and there's tons of other data like this -- will convince people to recognize and respect individual differences that are genetically driven."
-- Los Angeles Times