Arts & Life
Canstar Community News
Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 28/5/2019 (408 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.
The jury that will decide whether a 46-year-old man is guilty of killing his 42-year-old girlfriend and ordering the disposal of her body in a barrel outside a suburban Winnipeg home has been urged to be suspicious about the testimonies of several women who said the accused killer was responsible.
Perez Cleveland has pleaded not guilty to first-degree murder in the August 2016 death of Jennifer Barrett.
Cleveland's defence lawyer, Steven Brennan, argued the jury should have reasonable doubt about Cleveland's guilt. He suggested one of the women who testified could have been responsible for the assaults Barrett suffered, and urged jurors to think carefully about what they've been told over the course of the Court of Queen's Bench trial.
"This case boils down to how much faith, trust and confidence you have in these three women, principal witnesses... what can you make of their evidence?" he asked jurors during his final arguments.
"Collusion certainly appears likely."
Barrett, a former nurse, was one of five women who was in an open relationship with Cleveland and living with him in a two-storey home at 38 Forest Lake Dr., in Waverley Heights, along with his adult daughter. Barrett's body was discovered in a steel barrel beside the house on Dec. 1, 2016, after Cleveland and the women had already abandoned the property.
Crown prosecutors called to the witness stand four other women who were in the house when Barrett died. All of them offered "eerily similar" testimony detailing the control, abuse and violent torture Cleveland inflicted upon them, Crown prosecutor Breta Passler told jurors during her closing arguments Tuesday.
She argued Cleveland is guilty of first-degree murder because he "physically and psychologically" confined Barrett to the home, beat her for days in the basement and then ordered two of the women to clean up the crime scene and get rid of Barrett's body.
His motive was jealousy because Cleveland believed Barrett was cheating on him even though it wouldn't have been possible for her to have an affair while she was under Cleveland's control, Passler told jurors.
An autopsy couldn't determine how Barrett died, but one of the women, Jessica Reid, testified she was in the basement when Cleveland was beating Barrett behind a curtain. Reid said she saw Barrett's final moments alive, tried to give her CPR and saw Cleveland use a Taser on her in an effort to revive her.
"We say that even if the body of Jennifer Barrett had never been discovered, the evidence you heard is sufficient to prove murder," Passler told the jury.
The defence's argument that it could have been one of Cleveland's other victims who killed Barrett "makes no sense," Passler argued. Instead, in his rage, Cleveland "simply did not care whether she died or not."
"We say those beatings were not accidental," Passler said. "Her death could not have been unexpected."
The defence argued it could have been Reid, not Cleveland, who killed Barrett. Brennan didn't suggest Reid should have been charged with murder, but said jurors should have a reasonable doubt about Cleveland's guilt.
"You may suspect, fairly, I think, that he's not a nice person. There may be some truth to the allegations that he may be controlling, or that he may be abusive, but that does not mean he murdered Jennifer Barrett," Brennan told jurors.
If the jury believes Cleveland was involved in Barrett's death, Brennan argued, "I say this is no more than an unintentional killing." Cleveland could be convicted of manslaughter if the jury believes he killed Barrett by accident, he said.
Barrett had known Cleveland for several years and they had a child together. Three years before she died, while she was living with Cleveland and the other women in B.C., Barrett signed a handwritten contract that referred to her as a "submissive" and to Cleveland as her "master."
Chief Justice Glenn Joyal is set to give jurors legal instructions Wednesday afternoon before their deliberations begin.
Katie May reports on courts, crime and justice for the Free Press.
Your support has enabled us to provide free access to stories about COVID-19 because we believe everyone deserves trusted and critical information during the pandemic.
Our readership has contributed additional funding to give Free Press online subscriptions to those that can’t afford one in these extraordinary times — giving new readers the opportunity to see beyond the headlines and connect with other stories about their community.
To those who have made donations, thank you.
To those able to give and share our journalism with others, please Pay it Forward.
The Free Press has shared COVID-19 stories free of charge because we believe everyone deserves access to trusted and critical information during the pandemic.
While we stand by this decision, it has undoubtedly affected our bottom line.
After nearly 150 years of reporting on our city, we don’t want to stop any time soon. With your support, we’ll be able to forge ahead with our journalistic mission.
If you believe in an independent, transparent, and democratic press, please consider subscribing today.
We understand that some readers cannot afford a subscription during these difficult times and invite them to apply for a free digital subscription through our Pay it Forward program.