May 25, 2015


Local

Winnipeg updates way it designates, protects significant buildings

The St. Boniface Cathedral will see protection extend over its cemetery.

JOE BRYKSA / WINNIPEG FREE PRESS

The St. Boniface Cathedral will see protection extend over its cemetery. Photo Store

Hundreds of Winnipeg property owners have received letters from the city, informing them their homes, buildings or businesses are no longer considered for protection as historic places.

This is not, however, a prelude to an unprecedented volley of wrecking balls. After 10 years of trying to settle squabbles between developers and heritage advocates, the city has updated the way it designates and protects historic buildings.

The Manitoba Club is awaiting assessment for full-blown heritage protection

JOE BRYKSA / WINNIPEG FREE PRESS

The Manitoba Club is awaiting assessment for full-blown heritage protection Photo Store

The Northern Hotel is an example of a commemorated property that has no special protection, just a certificate.

The Northern Hotel is an example of a commemorated property that has no special protection, just a certificate.

New rules, which came into effect June 1, have slashed the number of properties awaiting heritage assessment by more than 70 per cent.

Until this month, the city had 235 municipally protected historic properties and another 463 awaiting an assessment to see whether they should be protected.

Developers and heritage advocates both hated this system, complaining the only time city planners got around to making those assessments was when a building was about to be redeveloped or was about to change hands.

Now, the former heritage-conservation inventory has been abolished. No less than 337 properties that once sat on that inventory are merely commemorated with historic certificates, which offer no special protection.

The remaining 127 still await an assessment the city hopes to tackle during the next three years. The city has hired an additional staffer -- a heritage planner trained as an architect -- to tackle the remaining backlog.

"Things shouldn't be sitting in limbo, waiting for a proposed demolition or changes to push us into listing them (as historic) or not," said John Kiernan, the city's urban-design manager. "It couldn't come as a surprise and it shouldn't be a roadblock up front."

He said the original rationale for placing buildings on the inventory in the 1970s was not rigorous, from a heritage perspective. "Forty years ago, when the original list was prepared, it was done on a drive-around basis," he said.

CentreVenture president and CEO Ross McGowan, a former developer whose job now includes repurposing heritage buildings, said the new rules provide certainty.

"Don't surprise me when I go to sell my building and it shows up on the registry," he said. "This provides clarity. This is very helpful."

Some heritage advocates, however, are concerned with the loss of potential protection for buildings that once sat on the old inventory.

"Placing a building on the (inventory) didn't prevent developers from demolishing it, but it required a review to determine if the building should continue to be protected or not. Over the years, many buildings have been delisted and demolished," said Dave Plummer, who owns a commemorated Wolseley home. "Changing the list to a commemorative list with no protection at all removes that review process."

But Kiernan said commemorated properties do not face imminent threat. Any demolition request must be approved by the city, he said.

Properties considered "historic resources," meanwhile, will no longer be classified under three levels of heritage protection. There is only one historic status now, which confers protection to a specified part or parts of a property.

That could be a stained-glass window, a grand staircase or even just a facade, depending on the property, Kiernan said. But in some cases, every aspect of a building's interior and exterior may be protected. The new rules also allow groups of buildings and green spaces to be protected.

bartley.kives@freepress.mb.ca

Republished from the Winnipeg Free Press print edition June 9, 2014 B1

History

Updated on Monday, June 9, 2014 at 6:22 AM CDT: Replaces photo

You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

Have Your Say

New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscribers only. why?

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press Subscribers only. why?

The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective January 2015.

Winnipeg Free Press | @WinnipegNews

May 25 2:50 pm

Detective hunts for missing pets with trusty sniffer wfp.to/Rl3

Winnipeg Free Press | @WinnipegNews

May 25 2:36 pm

Grilling gurus debate pros and cons of charcoal, gas wfp.to/Rl9

Winnipeg Free Press | @WinnipegNews

May 25 2:36 pm

Dolphin dies despite surgery at Vancouver Aquarium wfp.to/Rld

Winnipeg Free Press | @WinnipegNews

May 25 2:34 pm

Twister kills 13 in Mexico border city; 12 missing in Texas wfp.to/Rlp

Winnipeg Free Press | @WinnipegNews

May 25 2:28 pm

Canada helps block UN anti-nukes plan wfp.to/Rlb

Scroll down to load more

Top