Pallister’s PST case thrown out

No right to referendum: judge

Advertisement

Advertise with us

A legal bid by Opposition Leader Brian Pallister to reverse the hike of the provincial sales tax without a referendum has been thrown out of court.

Read this article for free:

or

Already have an account? Log in here »

To continue reading, please subscribe:

Monthly Digital Subscription

$0 for the first 4 weeks*

  • Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
  • Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
  • Access News Break, our award-winning app
  • Play interactive puzzles

*No charge for 4 weeks then price increases to the regular rate of $19.00 plus GST every four weeks. Offer available to new and qualified returning subscribers only. Cancel any time.

Monthly Digital Subscription

$4.75/week*

  • Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
  • Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
  • Access News Break, our award-winning app
  • Play interactive puzzles

*Billed as $19 plus GST every four weeks. Cancel any time.

To continue reading, please subscribe:

Add Free Press access to your Brandon Sun subscription for only an additional

$1 for the first 4 weeks*

  • Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
  • Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
  • Access News Break, our award-winning app
  • Play interactive puzzles
Start now

No thanks

*Your next subscription payment will increase by $1.00 and you will be charged $16.99 plus GST for four weeks. After four weeks, your payment will increase to $23.99 plus GST every four weeks.

Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 19/07/2014 (4131 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.

A legal bid by Opposition Leader Brian Pallister to reverse the hike of the provincial sales tax without a referendum has been thrown out of court.

In a 15-page decision released Friday, Court of Queen’s Bench Judge Kenneth Hanssen said Pallister and his Progressive Conservatives didn’t have a legal leg to stand on.

Pallister had argued the NDP robbed Manitobans of the right to vote on the tax increase, because the New Democrats, in a single piece of legislation (Bill 20), did away with the need for a referendum when they raised the tax by one point to eight per cent last year.

John Woods / THE CANADIAN PRESS FILES
A PST-hike protest at the Manitoba legislature in May 2013. Tory Leader Brian Pallister has led opposition to the increase.
John Woods / THE CANADIAN PRESS FILES A PST-hike protest at the Manitoba legislature in May 2013. Tory Leader Brian Pallister has led opposition to the increase.

Pallister wanted the court to agree, in a daylong hearing last month, to his claim that the NDP violated the Charter of Rights and Freedoms when it raised the PST without having a referendum as outlined in the 1995 Taxpayer Protection Act. The act was brought in under the Tory government of Gary Filmon.

Hanssen rejected that argument. In straightforward language, Hanssen said based on well-established law, there is no constitutional right to a referendum in Canada.

“I am satisfied the charter imposes no obligation on a government to implement a referendum or to maintain a referendum it has previously established,” Hanssen said.

“Under the circumstances, Mr. Pallister has failed to satisfy me that the charter is engaged in this case.”

Tory spokesman Mike Brown said the PCs will review the decision with their lawyer, Robert Tapper, before making a full comment next week.

“We’re disappointed, but we’re not disappointed so much for us as we are for all Manitobans who are opposed to the PST hike, and I think that’s just about everybody,” Brown said.

Pallister has said he would appeal if he lost in the Court of Queen’s Bench.

Matt Williamson, a spokesman for the Selinger government, said Hanssen’s decision is not surprising.

“We have said from the beginning that this case was nothing more than a political stunt by the PC party — a party that would put the brakes on critical investments in infrastructure and flood protection,” Williamson said in an emailed statement.

“We find it regrettable that the PC party required the province to spend money on this case, and we hope Brian Pallister accepts the court’s clear decision.”

The Selinger government has said revenue from the PST increase will fix roads and highways and fund other infrastructure projects such as new flood-protection measures for Lake Manitoba and Lake St. Martin.

Williamson provincial taxpayers were forced to spend more than $150,000 in legal costs in response to the PC party’s legal challenge.

SSLqUnder the circumstances, Mr. Pallister has failed to satisfy me that the charter is engaged in this case’

— Court of Queen’s Bench Judge Kenneth Hanssen

Hanssen also didn’t mince words when addressing the Filmon government’s 1995 Taxpayer Protection Act.

“It is legally ineffective and unenforceable,” he said.

“The doctrine of parliamentary sovereignty prevents a legislative body from binding future legislative bodies as to the substance of its future legislation. This is precisely what the Progressive Conservative government was trying to do in 1995.

“The Supreme Court of Canada again confirmed that ‘as a matter of constitutional principle, neither Parliament nor the legislatures can, by ordinary legislation, fetter themselves against some future legislative action.’

Government lawyer Jonathan Kroft had argued during the hearing if Pallister’s case was given any weight, it would undermine the role of elected MLAs to make decisions.

“The court is being invited to tell the legislature what it could and couldn’t talk about,” Kroft said. “That’s a matter covered by parliamentary privilege. This court should not be going anywhere near that question.”

Hanssen agreed, saying he was satisfied the legislature had the constitutional authority to consider and pass Bill 20 despite the referendum requirement.

bruce.owen@freepress.mb.ca

Report Error Submit a Tip

Local

LOAD MORE