Winnipeg Free Press - PRINT EDITION

Learning transit lessons?

Report outlines keys to success; critics say city lacks the vision

A view of the new rapid transit station over Osborne Street. A critic says fare hikes to finance projects send the wrong message.

JOHN WOODS / WINNIPEG FREE PRESS Enlarge Image

A view of the new rapid transit station over Osborne Street. A critic says fare hikes to finance projects send the wrong message.

Ottawa and San Jose have proven transit networks can be a hub for development -- if there's the will to do it.

While Winnipeg is still in the final stages of building its first-ever rapid transit corridor, a new planning handbook breaks down how the city can integrate transit networks with new and existing homes, retail and office spaces. The idea is to make it easier for people to take transit, and the report notes what Winnipeg can learn from cities that have taken steps to make transit stations hubs where people can easily walk to where they live, work and shop.

PHOTOS BY JOHN WOODS / WINNIPEG FREE PRESS
Views of the new rapid transit station over Osborne Street. A critic says fare hikes to finance projects send the wrong message.

Enlarge Image

PHOTOS BY JOHN WOODS / WINNIPEG FREE PRESS Views of the new rapid transit station over Osborne Street. A critic says fare hikes to finance projects send the wrong message. (PHOTOS BY JOHN WOODS / WINNIPEG FREE PRESS)

Harkness rapid transit station.

Enlarge Image

Harkness rapid transit station. (JOHN WOODS / WINNIPEG FREE PRESS)

What other cities did

A new report says one of the keys to getting transit-friendly development is choosing the right area and having the political will to get it done. Here are a few examples of what other North American cities have done to encourage this type of development:

 

  • Ottawa

What it did: Built a 31-kilometre bus rapid transit route considered one of the world's most effective bus transit systems.

How it did it: Sticking to a plan that focuses on transit and how it interacts with adjacent developments.

More than 25 per cent of all stations are integrated with an adjacent development, including the St. Laurent Shopping Centre where owners donated the land in return for relief on parking. As a result, a bi-level station that's attached to the mall was created. About 30 per cent of mall patrons now travel by bus.

Impact: More than 50 per cent of people who travel downtown take the bus, and 3,200 residential units and 440,000 square metres of commercial space were built near transitway stations over an eight-year period.

 

  • Plano, Texas

What it did: Used a downtown light-rail plaza to help anchor the revitalization of downtown's Eastside Village.

How it did it: The city provided the leadership to make the project happen and advocated for the station location, offered it for development, paid for public infrastructure and streetscape improvements, increased allowable density and waived fees. A $17.7-million high-density mixed-use project was built that fronts onto Dallas Area Rapid transit's light rail plaza. The project included 234 apartment units and 1,400 square metres of ground-floor retail.

Impact: Eastside Village was the first major step to transform the downtown.

 

  • Bloomington, Minn.

What it did: Created a destination transit station with 10 hotels, the Mall of America and a new IKEA store. Now the area is being redeveloped to increase the connectivity.

How it will work: The area around the station is currently undergoing redevelopment and will include two 17-storey condos with underground parking, 830 townhouses and condo units, a park between the station and a new hotel and an extensive system of pedestrian trails and walkways.

Impact: The redevelopment is occurring on land that is underused as surface parking lots. The housing units will be within walking distance of the transit station and the central park area will act as a gathering place.

 

  • San Jose, Calif.

What it did: Convert a park-and-ride into a transit-oriented development.

How it did it: Took an underused light rail park-and-ride and issued a request for proposals for the space. The former space now includes 240 park-and-ride spaces, 195 units of affordable housing and 400 square metres of retail space and a daycare centre.

Impact: The city has aggressively sought to locate housing next to transit. Since 1990, more than 20,000 new units have been built or approved next to transit.

To do this, Winnipeg needs to increase density and create innovative parking strategies and pedestrian-oriented areas. The report said the goal is not to get rid of car travel, but to give residents an option on how they can commute.

But the report also said political will and leadership are key -- something some local experts say Winnipeg lacks, which can be a major barrier to catching up with the robust transit networks that exist in other urban centres.

"We're at least 50 years behind other cities," said Jino Distasio, director of the University of Winnipeg's Institute of Urban Studies. "It's not about being green, it's about having multiple ways to get to different places. I can't think of a major global city that does not have a major transit system."

Downtown Business Improvement Zone executive director Stefano Grande said there's a disconnect between the transit-planning document and the city's recent decision to increase bus fares to pay for the second phase of rapid transit.

Last fall, city council took the unusual step of approving a 20-cent transit fare hike to cover part of the cost of extending the city's first rapid transit line to Bison Drive near the University of Manitoba. Buses are set to roll on the first leg of the corridor this April and plans for the second phase have yet to be finalized.

Grande said the fare hike sends the wrong message at a time when the city should be looking at ways to integrate transit and land-use planning. The Graham Avenue mall is a perfect example of an opportunity, Grande said, since there are a lot of underused buildings in the area and near the U of W that could be converted into affordable housing or commercial and retail space.

He said these types of mixed-use developments generate more taxes for the city than typical single-family home dwellings and commercial strip malls. Grande said Winnipeg should undertake a study to identify parcels of land across the city that could be used for transit-oriented plans in the future.

"The fact that there's discussions about funding rapid transit through increasing fares tells me we have a little (ways) more to go," Grande said. "What we'd like to see is a business plan: This is what the first three phases of rapid transit will cost, here are the parcels of land that can be converted to transit-oriented development, here's how much tax it will generate."

Distasio said he thinks part of the problem is civic government has not championed transit. He said Winnipeg continues to focus on fixing roads and filling potholes instead of touting the benefits of forward-thinking projects such as the Fort Rouge Yards infill.

He said Winnipeg is growing, and the city cannot continue to expand unless it provides an alternative to vehicle transportation. The cost of doing nothing, he said, is the city will continue to lag behind other cities.

"There are smaller cities that are so far ahead of us," Distasio said.

Property committee chairman Coun. Jeff Browaty (North Kildonan) said Winnipeg can do more to make transit more appealing, and getting people on the bus is a way to help accommodate the city's growth. Browaty said arterial roads in the city's southwest are close to capacity and rapid transit is one way to decrease congestion and giving people another option.

Fort Rouge Coun. Jenny Gerbasi said Winnipeg tends to "react" to new developments -- such as IKEA and Sage Creek -- instead of building transit into major plans in the first place. She said there needs to be a shift in the city's planning so residents don't need two or three cars in order to get around.

While she is concerned about the political commitment to get this done, Gerbasi said she thinks Winnipeg is on the cusp of moving forward.

Others aren't so optimistic.

"The stuff they talk about is all nice but it all seems to be window dressing because they never dedicate any money to doing it," said Lynne Fernandez, a researcher for the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives. "All they do is write it in reports and put the reports on some shelf somewhere."

Council's property committee will review the planning handbook at a meeting on Tuesday.

jen.skerritt@freepress.mb.ca

Republished from the Winnipeg Free Press print edition February 11, 2012 A3

History

Updated on Saturday, February 11, 2012 at 8:57 AM CST: adds fact box, fixes cutlines

(You must be logged in to post your reaction)

Your reaction?

You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is register and/or login and you can join the conversation and give your feedback.

The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective April 16, 2010; View the changes. New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.

letters

Make text: Larger | Smaller

Poll

What should be done with old blue boxes once new recycling carts are rolled out?

View Results

Proudly brought to you by:

The Dilawri Group

Ads by Google