Ad another thing: sounding the alarm about advertising’s ill effects on society

Jean Kilbourne has been at it for more than four decades

Advertisement

Advertise with us

Jean Kilbourne was an adbuster long before there was anything close to resembling Adbusters.

Read this article for free:

or

Already have an account? Log in here »

To continue reading, please subscribe:

Subscribe and receive a limited-edition Free Press branded hat or tote.

Digital Subscription

One year of digital access for only $205*

  • Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
  • Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
  • Access News Break, our award-winning app
  • Play interactive puzzles

*First annual payment billed as $205.00 + GST for one year. This annual subscription will automatically renew at $233.00 + GST every 52 weeks (10% off the regular annual price of $259.35). Offer available to new and qualified returning subscribers only. Cancel any time.

To continue reading, please subscribe:

Add Free Press access to your Brandon Sun subscription for only an additional

$1 for the first 4 weeks*

  • Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
  • Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
  • Access News Break, our award-winning app
  • Play interactive puzzles
Start now

*Your next Brandon Sun subscription payment will increase by $1.00 and you will be charged $17.95 plus GST for four weeks. After four weeks, your payment will increase to $24.95 plus GST every four weeks.

Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 22/10/2013 (4649 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.

Jean Kilbourne was an adbuster long before there was anything close to resembling Adbusters.

When the acclaimed feminist scholar, author, filmmaker and media literacy pioneer, who speaks Thursday at 7:30 p.m., at the University of Winnipeg’s Convocation Hall, began tearing advertisements out of magazines and posting them on her refrigerator back in 1968, she didn’t know she would start a movement, let alone a respected field of study.

At the time, she just wanted to open people’s eyes. She assembled the ads she collected into a slideshow presentation that she took to college campuses in the 1970s. She had one goal: tell anyone who would listen about the damaging effect ads were having on women.

Postmedia Getty Images
Kate Moss in an advertisement. Jean Kilbourne has dissected the ways in which ads create impossible ideals that women must spend an incredible amount of time, energy and money chasing.
Postmedia Getty Images Kate Moss in an advertisement. Jean Kilbourne has dissected the ways in which ads create impossible ideals that women must spend an incredible amount of time, energy and money chasing.

“I was the first person to start talking about the image of women in advertising,” Kilbourne, 70, recalls. “(The ads) were outrageous and no one was paying attention to them.”

That scrappy slideshow presentation was the basis for Kilbourne’s groundbreaking 1979 documentary, Killing Us Softly: Advertising’s Image of Women, which became one of the top-selling educational videos of all time. Through an incisive feminist lens, Kilbourne dissected the ways in which ads create impossible ideals that women must spend an incredible amount of time, energy and money chasing.

She talked about the inordinate value placed on beauty, thinness and youth. She got people thinking about the objectification of women. She pointed out how sexist stereotypes reinforced a patriarchal society.

“In those days, there was also the stereotype of the housewife. Now, we have the Swiffer woman,” Kilbourne deadpans.

She said advertising had a deep connection to a host of social issues, including addiction, violence against women and eating disorders.

It was trailblazing stuff. And it shocked people who saw the film.

“It was all very new in those days,” Kilbourne says. “Everything I was saying was so radical. I did have to spend some time convincing.” (People weren’t expecting Killing Us Softly to be funny, either, as it frequently is. No one can call Jean Kilbourne a humourless feminist.)

Kilbourne has made a career of convincing people to sit up and take notice. Killing Us Softly spawned a series of films: Still Killing Us Softly (1987), Killing Us Softly 3 (2000) and Killing Us Softly 4 (2010) — a fraction of an impressive filmography that takes on everything from advertising’s obsession with thinness to our culture of violence to the sexualization of children.

She’s written two books, 2000’s Can’t Buy My Love: How Advertising Changes the Way We Think and Feel (originally published as Deadly Persuasion in 1999) and 2008’s So Sexy So Soon: the new sexualized childhood, and what parents can do to protect their kids. She remains a popular fixture of the lecture circuit.

That Kilbourne has worked so tirelessly for over four decades shows just how little has changed in the world of advertising.

“It’s gotten much worse,” she says. “The tyranny of the ideal image of beauty, the sexualization of children, the objectification of women — it’s all gotten worse. But the thing that’s gotten better is the fact I’m not the only person talking about this anymore.”

Indeed, in the intervening years since Killing Us Softly’s release, media literacy has become an important area of study. Organizations such as Canada’s Concerned Children’s Advertisers, which launched in 1990, are using the medium to educate children and get them thinking critically about the images they see.

“I’m no longer alone,” Kilbourne says. “There are a lot people researching and discussing these issues. We know now that the sexualization of children does real harm to children. That’s not an opinion anymore.”

She’s also encouraged by young, plugged-in feminists and activists who use social media to get their points across.

“There’s a groundswell of opposition and a movement to teach media literacy in schools.” She points out that some advertisers are even taking baby steps, singling out the Dove: Real Beauty Campaign as an example. “It has its flaws, too, but it’s a move in the right direction.”

CP
A digitally altered Ralph Lauren model
CP A digitally altered Ralph Lauren model

While progress is being made, she says, there’s still a lot of work to be done. Kilbourne believes media literacy should be taught in schools, so the next generation can become critical media consumers. Kids are a primary target of advertising; in Kilbourne’s native U.S., children between the ages of two and five spend 32 hours per week in front of the TV on average. They see thousands of advertising messages every day.

Still, Kilbourne says media literacy programs are still a far-off goal for many American schools.

“The schools in the U.S. are in terrible trouble,” Kilbourne says. “Media literacy? Give me a break. Most aren’t even teaching sex ed.”

Here at home, media literacy is a unit in the Manitoba English Language Arts curriculum.

Media literacy, she says, is also not in the best interests of advertisers, particularly the alcohol and tobacco industries, which rely on addiction. Indeed, “advertisers don’t want a media literate public.”

And then, of course, there’s good, old-fashioned apathy.

“We all believe we’re not influenced by advertising — and advertisers love that we believe that,” Kilbourne says. “Ads are seen as stupid and trivial and we like to think we’re superior to them. We tune them out and it’s often true we don’t pay conscious attention. But ads do their work whether we pay attention to them or not.”

People are still as shocked by Kilbourne’s presentations in 2013 as they were in 1979. “People are still often surprised, amazingly enough.”

That’s why she continues to do the work.

“I just do the best I can,” she says. “I use facts. I use persuasion. I use humour. What I’m talking about is incredibly serious, so I consciously use humour to make it bearable.

“I believe that action is the antidote to despair,” she adds. “The more we can get engaged, the better off we’ll be.”

jen.zoratti@freepress.mb.ca

Jen Zoratti

Jen Zoratti
Columnist

Jen Zoratti is a columnist and feature writer working in the Arts & Life department, as well as the author of the weekly newsletter NEXT. A National Newspaper Award finalist for arts and entertainment writing, Jen is a graduate of the Creative Communications program at RRC Polytech and was a music writer before joining the Free Press in 2013. Read more about Jen.

Every piece of reporting Jen produces is reviewed by an editing team before it is posted online or published in print – part of the Free Press‘s tradition, since 1872, of producing reliable independent journalism. Read more about Free Press’s history and mandate, and learn how our newsroom operates.

 

Our newsroom depends on a growing audience of readers to power our journalism. If you are not a paid reader, please consider becoming a subscriber.

Our newsroom depends on its audience of readers to power our journalism. Thank you for your support.

History

Updated on Tuesday, October 22, 2013 6:37 AM CDT: Changes headline, adds photo

Updated on Tuesday, October 22, 2013 8:25 AM CDT: adds image

Updated on Tuesday, October 22, 2013 9:48 AM CDT: Removes redundant words

Updated on Tuesday, October 22, 2013 10:05 AM CDT: Clarifies in the U.S., children between the ages of two and five spend 32 hours per week in front of the TV on average,

Updated on Tuesday, October 22, 2013 10:24 AM CDT: Notes media literacy is a unit in the Manitoba English Language Arts curriculum.

Report Error Submit a Tip

More Stories

Today’s horoscope

Georgia Nicols 4 minute read Preview

Today’s horoscope

Georgia Nicols 4 minute read 2:00 AM CDT

MOON ALERT: Avoid shopping (except food and gas) and important decisions after 5 p.m. The moon is in Leo.

ARIES (March 21-April 19)

An unusual idea or an unexpected event might take you into an entirely new headspace. You might entertain the notion of a new kind of future for yourself — something more romantic or more spiritual/touchy-feely (call it whatever you like) — than you had previously thought.

TAURUS (April 20-May 20)

Read
2:00 AM CDT

What a way to fly — if you’re rich

Pam Frampton 5 minute read Preview

What a way to fly — if you’re rich

Pam Frampton 5 minute read 2:00 AM CDT

When my husband and I were catching a flight from Roatán, Honduras, to Toronto earlier this year, we shared a taxi to the airport with an acquaintance.

He was an amiable guy and we made small talk. I noticed he got jostled travelling over the bumpy island roads same as we did, even though he was one of those annoyingly well-put-together travellers who seemed unfazed by the crushing humidity that was making my hair stick to my neck and forehead. Perhaps he was wearing one of those breathable fabrics that wicks away moisture.

And though I had heard he had travelled to many parts of the world, I noticed his luggage wasn’t quite as “seasoned” as ours.

We shook hands at departures, and the light rhythmic whir of his pristine wheelie bag quickly faded as he melted into the throng at Juan Manuel Gálvez International Airport while we were still gathering our bags.

Read
2:00 AM CDT

Toys ‘R’ Us closing Polo Park store

Free Press staff 2 minute read Preview

Toys ‘R’ Us closing Polo Park store

Free Press staff 2 minute read Monday, Jul. 13, 2026

Embattled toy retailer Toys “R” Us is closing its store in Winnipeg’s Polo Park area.

Staff hung signs sharing the news — and advertising liquidation pricing — on Friday. The signage does not indicate when the store, located at 1445 St. Matthews Ave., will close for good.

A store manager declined to comment on Monday, directing a reporter to Toys “R” Us Canada Ltd.’s head office. The company did not respond to interview requests.

Toys “R” Us announced in January it would close its Polo Park location, but reversed course a few weeks later. The Canada-wide company has been in creditor protection since February.

Read
Monday, Jul. 13, 2026

Man armed with ‘edged weapon’ dies after dispute in Linden Woods home

Scott Billeck 6 minute read Preview

Man armed with ‘edged weapon’ dies after dispute in Linden Woods home

Scott Billeck 6 minute read Updated: Yesterday at 4:21 PM CDT

The family of a 42-year-old Winnipeg man shot and killed by police in Linden Woods on Monday night says the incident raises troubling questions about how officers respond to people in mental-health crisis.

“Their reaction to mental health is my concern,” said the man’s sister-in-law, Erica Smith, who spoke outside her brother-in-law’s Avon Gate home on Tuesday. She said her brother-in-law struggled with his mental health.

“It didn’t have to end like this,” she said, fighting back tears. “It could have ended differently.”

Police said officers encountered the man armed with an “edged weapon” at the home when they arrived shortly before 10:30 p.m.

Read
Updated: Yesterday at 4:21 PM CDT

ATV deaths, injuries are call for action

Editorial 4 minute read Preview

ATV deaths, injuries are call for action

Editorial 4 minute read 2:00 AM CDT

The numbers are alarming, and the calls to address them are neither unexpected nor unreasonable. But reducing the rate of injuries and deaths related to the use of all-terrain vehicles will not be easily accomplished.

The death last week of a 59-year-old woman in South Indian Lake, about 770 kilometres north of Winnipeg, was the fifth ATV-related fatality in Manitoba this year — a particularly disturbing statistic in light of the fact 2025 was the deadliest year in more than a decade for ATV riders in this province.

Eleven people lost their lives in ATV accidents last year, according to recently released data, and 227 required hospital care for injuries sustained while operating off-road vehicles. There have been 68 ATV-related deaths in this province since 2017.

All of which has prompted questions about whether it’s time for Manitoba to follow the lead of other provinces that have made ATV safety training mandatory for users of off-road vehicles.

Read
2:00 AM CDT

Plenty of losses all around

Gwynne Dyer 4 minute read 2:00 AM CDT

The last time oil-tankers were being shot up in the Persian Gulf, back in the 1980s, it was Saddam Hussein’s brutal tyranny in Iraq versus Ayatollah Khomeini’s revolutionary Islamist regime in Iran.

The United States backed Saddam because he was just another murderous thug, whereas the new regime in Tehran was an actual threat to American interests. It had overthrown Iran’s American-backed puppet king and wanted to spread its Islamist ideology across the region.

So, of course, Ronald Reagan’s administration chose Saddam’s side. It sent Iraq arms by clandestine means (because Congress wouldn’t authorize it) and even provided targeting information for Iraqi poison gas attacks on Iran. The Americans chose the “lesser evil,” but at least they knew it was evil.

Once in a while they would even say it out loud, quoting U.S. diplomat Henry Kissinger: “It’s a shame that both sides can’t lose.” But they never did anything about it, and after eight years of slaughter, the war ended in a no-score draw.