Some owners abusing pet’s drugs

Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 29/08/2017 (3245 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.

WASHINGTON, D.C. — Some American states are taking the war on opioids into veterinarians’ offices, aiming to prevent people who are addicted to opioids from using their pets to procure drugs for their own use.

Colorado and Maine recently enacted laws that allow or require veterinarians to check the prescription histories of pet owners as well as their pets. And Alaska, Connecticut and Virginia have imposed new limits on the amount of opioids a vet can prescribe.

Veterinarians typically do not dispense such widely abused drugs as Vicodin, OxyContin or Percocet, but they do dispense the painkiller Tramadol, the anesthetic ketamine and hydrocodone, an opiate used to treat coughing in dogs — controlled substances that humans abuse.

But even as some states push for veterinarians to assess the records of human clients, many veterinarians maintain they’re unqualified to do so. And while a handful of states now require vets to check the prescription histories of pet owners, about two-thirds of the states explicitly prohibit it.

“I’m a veterinarian, not a physician. I shouldn’t have access to a human’s medical history,” says Dr. Kevin Lazarcheff, president of the California Veterinary Medical Association. California veterinarians have access to a state database with prescription histories and may check on pet owners before they prescribe for their animals, but they are not required to do so.

A veterinarian may be uncomfortable seeing alerts about his or her clients’ history with controlled substances prescribed by their physicians, said Lazarcheff, who lives and practises veterinary medicine in Oakhurst, Calif. And if the veterinarian suspects a client is abusing drugs, what then? “That’s an interesting point,” Lazarcheff says, because there’s no set protocol. The one time he suspected a pet owner of abusing drugs, his office called the local police. “Where it went after that, I don’t know.”

State prescription monitoring programs, or PMPs, allow physicians and other practitioners to check a patient’s prescription history. But at least 32 states do not require veterinarians to report any dispensing information on the PMP.

In the pre-internet era, most states required veterinarians to mail in paper reports of narcotic prescriptions. When states switched to electronic systems, veterinarians said their offices lacked the technology to comply, and many states removed the reporting requirement for vets, says Patrick Knue, director of the Prescription Drug Monitoring Program Training and Technical Assistance Center at Brandeis University.

The experiences of Maine and New Hampshire this year illustrate difficulties states face trying to stop the flow of drugs to drug abusers while respecting the role of veterinarians. Both states enacted laws requiring veterinarians to check the state PMP database before prescribing, but the New Hampshire Legislature repealed its law after veterinarians argued that their professional responsibilities did not extend to the human owner.

“Our patients are pets,” says Dr. Jane Barlow Roy, past president of the New Hampshire Veterinary Medical Association.

— Stateline.org